Skip to main content
Log in

N-Ratio: a Novel Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Stage-III Cutaneous Melanoma

  • Melanomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the ratio between metastatic and excised lymph nodes (“N-ratio”) might have an independent prognostic value in patients with TNM stage-III cutaneous melanoma.

Methods

The clinical records of 213 melanoma patients who had undergone radical lymph node dissection (RLND) and were found to harbor pathology-proven metastatic disease were used for analysis. The following clinico-pathological variables were considered for the prognostic study: patient’s age and sex, primary tumor site, tumor thickness, Clark’s level, ulceration, absolute number of positive lymph nodes, total number of excised lymph nodes, TNM stage (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC), and N-ratio (N-ratio A, ≤10%; N-ratio B, 10–25%; N-ratio C, >25%).

Results

Patients were categorized into three N-ratio classes according to the percentage of metastatic lymph nodes (N-ratio A, n = 94; N-ratio B, n = 95; N-ratio C, n = 24). The mean follow-up was 40 months. At univariate survival analysis, tumor thickness (P < 0.0001), ulceration (P = 0.046), Clark’s level (P = 0.0002), number of positive lymph nodes (P < 0.0001), TNM stage (P < 0.0001), and N-ratio (P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Interestingly, the Cox proportional hazard model showed that, along with tumor thickness (HR 1.069, = 0.008) and TNM stage (HR 1.696, = 0.015), N-ratio (HR 1.578, = 0.012) also independently predicted OS.

Conclusions

N-ratio is a novel easy-to-obtain independent prognostic factor for melanoma patients with lymph node metastases and might provide clinicians with additional information suitable for patient stratification while choosing adjuvant treatment. Validation of these results in larger prospective series is warranted to implement N-ratio in the routine clinical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001; 16:3635–48

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prognostic factors Analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System. J Clin Oncol 2001; 16:3622–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Atkins MB, et al. An evidence staging system for cutaneous melanoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54:131–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 2005; 365:687–701

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsao H, Atkins MB, Sober AJ. Management of cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:998–1012

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Verna S, Quirt I, McrCeady D, Bak K, Charette M, Iscoe N. Systematic review of systematic adjuvant therapy for patients at high risk of recurrent melanoma. Cancer 2006; 106:1431–2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkwood JM, Manola J, Ibrahim J, Sondak V, Ernstoff MS, Rao U. A pooled analysis of eastern cooperative oncology group and intergroup trials of adjuvant high-dose interferon for melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10:1670–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lens MB, Dawes M. Interferon alfa therapy for malignant melanoma: a systemic review of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20:1818–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wheatley K, Natalie I, Hancock B, Gore M, Eggermont Alexander, Suciu S. Does adjuvant interferon-α for high-risk melanoma provide worthwhile benefit? A meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Cancer Treat Rev 2003; 29:241–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gogas H, Ioannovich J, Dafni U, et al. Prognostic significance of autoimmunity during treatment of melanoma with interferon. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:709–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, et al. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:1077–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, et al. The ratio between metastatic and examined nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless the type of lymphadenectomy. Results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 2007; 245:543–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woodward WA, Vinh-Hung V, Ueno NT, et al. Prognostic value of nodal ratios in node-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:2910–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuru B. Prognostic significance of total number of nodes removed, and ratio of positive nodes to removed nodes in positive breast carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:1082–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA, Hoffman JP. The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 2004; 70:235–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehmann EL, Romano JP. Testing statistical hypotheses, Third Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mocellin S, Provenzano M, Rossi CR, Pilati PL, Nitti D, Lise M. DNA Array-based gene profiling. From surgical specimen to the molecular portrait of cancer. Ann Surg 2005; 241:16–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bittner M, Meltzer P, Chen Y, et al. Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000; 406:536–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis TB, Robinson JE, Bastien R. Molecular classification of melanoma using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Cancer 2005; 104:1678–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheon AD, Essner R, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Judging the therapeutic value of lymph node dissections for melanoma. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191:16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Galliot-Repkat C, Cailliod R, Trost O, et al. The prognostic impact of the extent of lymph node dissection in patients with stage III melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:790–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Mocellin MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rossi, C.R., Mocellin, S., Pasquali, S. et al. N-Ratio: a Novel Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients with Stage-III Cutaneous Melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 310–315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9641-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9641-z

Keywords

Navigation