Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Isomalt for Colon-Specific Delivery and Its Comparison with Lactulose

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lactulose is used as a triggering substance in a unique colon-specific delivery technology called CODESTM. Colonic microflora degrades lactulose and forms short-chain fatty acids to activate the CODESTM system. However, lactulose has been reported to cause a Maillard-type reaction with substances containing primary or secondary amino groups that may produce carcinogenic compounds. Thus, the aim of this study was to look into the possibility to substitute lactulose with isomalt for fabrication of CODESTM. The in vitro degradation of both sugars before incorporating them into the CODESTM system was evaluated with the help of rat caecal microflora. The results showed that isomalt was less efficient with regard to its rate and extent of degradation into short-chain fatty acids by the microflora compared to lactulose. However, the in vitro dissolution study did not show a significant difference in the performance between lactulose and isomalt when they were incorporated separately in CODESTM. A similar result was also obtained in the in vivo study. Based on the above results, isomalt could be used as an alternative to lactulose for colonic delivery system utilizing the principles of CODESTM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang L, Chu JS, Fix JA. Colon-specific drug delivery: new approaches and in vitro/in vivo evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2002;235:1–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pinto JF. Site-specific drug delivery systems within the gastro-intestinal tract: from the mouth to the colon. Int J Pharm. 2010;395:44–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McConnell EL, Liu F, Basit AW. Colonic treatments and targets: issues and opportunities. J Drug Target. 2009;17:335–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Basit AW. Advances in colonic drug delivery. Drugs. 2005;65:1991–2007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jain A, Gupta Y, Jain SK. Perspectives of biodegradable natural polysaccharides for site-specific drug delivery to the colon. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2007;10:86–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinha VR, Kumria R. Polysaccharides in colon-specific drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2001;224:19–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aurora J, Talwar N, Pathak V. Colonic drug delivery challenges and opportunities—an overview. Eur Gastroenterol Rev. 2006;1:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Katsuma M, Watanabe S, Kawai H, Takemura S, Masuda Y, Fukui M. Studies on lactulose formulations for colon-specific drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2002;249:33–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Katsuma M, Watanabe S, Takemura S, Sako K, Sawada T, Masuda Y, et al. Scintigraphic evaluation of a novel colon-targeted delivery system (CODES™) in healthy volunteers. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93:1287–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Katsuma M, Watanabe S, Kawai H, Takemura S, Sako K. Effects of absorption promoters on insulin absorption through colon-targeted delivery. Int J Pharm. 2006;307:156–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li J, Yang L, Ferguson S, Hudson T, Watanabe S, Katsuma M, et al. In vitro evaluation of dissolution behavior for a colon-specific drug delivery system (CODES™) in multi-pH media using United States Pharmacopeia apparatus II and III. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2002;3:59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Watanabe S, Kawai H, Katsuma M, Fukui M. Colon-specific drug release system. US Patent 2003; 6368629.

  13. Yang L, Watanabe S, Li J, Chu JS, Katsuma M, Yokohama S, et al. Effect of colonic lactulose availability on the timing of drug release onset in vivo from a unique colon-specific drug delivery system (CODES™). Pharm Res. 2003;20:429–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brands CMJ, Alink GM, Van-Boekel MAJS, Jongen WMF. Mutagenicity of heated sugar-casein systems: effect of the Maillard reaction. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:2271–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dedhiya MG, Rastogi SK, Chhettry A, Mani N, Periclou A, Rao N. Modified and immediate release formulations of memantine. US Patent App 2006; 20070065512.

  16. Ndindayino F, Henrist D, Kiekens F, Vervaet C, Remon JP. Characterization and evaluation of isomalt performance in direct compression. Int J Pharm. 1999;189:113–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grupp U, Siebert G. Metabolism of hydrogenated palatinose, an equimolar mixture of α-D-glucopyranosido-1,6-sorbitol and α-D-glucopyranosido-1,6-mannitol. Res Exp Med (Berlin). 1978;173:261–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanauer SB. Aminosalicylates in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:60–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Friend DR. New oral delivery systems for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:247–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Klotz U, Schwab M. Topical delivery of therapeutic agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57:267–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee EJD, Ang SB. Simple and sensitive high performance liquid chromatographic assay for 5-aminosalicylic acid and acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid in serum. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1987;413:300–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger principles of biochemistry. 5th ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Garrett RH, Grisham CM. Biochemistry. 4th ed. Massachusetts: Cengage Learning; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lee A, Zumbe A, Storey D. Breath hydrogen after ingestion of the bulk sweeteners sorbitol, isomalt and sucrose in chocolate. Br J Nutr. 1994;71:731–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Storey D, Lee D, Bornet F, Brouns F. Gastrointestinal tolerance of erythritol and xylitol ingested in a liquid. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61:349–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Van-Weerden EJ, Huisman J. The digestion process of the sugar alcohol isomalt in the intestinal tract of the pig. Br J Nutr. 1993;69:455–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Waugh A, Grant A. Ross and Wilson anatomy and physiology in health and illness. 9th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Topping DL, Clifton PM. Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol Rev. 2001;81:1031–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia for providing Research University grant (1001/PFARMASI/815004) to support this work. The authors also would like to thank all manufacturers/suppliers for providing excipients free of cost for this study. Encouragement and support of Mrs. Fatema Rafiq Zakaria, chairperson, Maulana Azad Educational Trust, India is also greatly acknowledged.

Declarations of Interests

The authors report no declaration of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaikh Mohammed Asif.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dehghan, M.H.G., Gupta, V.R.M., Asif, S.M. et al. Assessment of Isomalt for Colon-Specific Delivery and Its Comparison with Lactulose. AAPS PharmSciTech 14, 53–59 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9886-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9886-0

KEY WORDS

Navigation