Skip to main content
Log in

Functional Assessment of Four Types of Disintegrants and their Effect on the Spironolactone Release Properties

  • Research Article
  • Published:
AAPS PharmSciTech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spironolactone is a drug derived from sterols that exhibits an incomplete oral absorption due to its low water solubility and slow dissolution rate. In this study, formulations of spironolactone with four disintegrants named as croscarmellose sodium, crospovidone, sodium starch glycolate and microcrystalline cellulose II (MCCII) were conducted. The effect of those disintegrants on the tensile strength, disintegration time and dissolution rate of spironolactone-based compacts was evaluated using a factorial design with three categorical factors (filler, lubricant, and disintegrant). The swelling values, water uptake and water sorption studies of these disintegrants all suggested that MCCII compacts disintegrate by a wicking mechanism similar to that of crospovidone, whereas a swelling mechanism was dominant for sodium starch glycolate and croscarmellose sodium. The disintegration time of MCCII and sodium starch glycolate remained unchanged with magnesium stearate. However, this lubricant delayed the disintegration time of crospovidone and croscarmellose sodium. MCCII presented the fastest disintegration time independent of the medium and lubricant employed. The water sorption ratio and swelling values determined sodium starch glycolate followed by croscarmellose sodium as the largest swelling materials, whereas crospovidone and MCCII where the least swelling disintegrants. The swelling property of sodium starch glycolate and croscarmellose sodium was strongly affected by the medium pH. The disintegration time of spironolactone compacts was faster when starch was used as a filler due to the formation of soft compacts. In this case, the type of filler employed rather than the disintegrant had a major effect on the disintegration and dissolution times of spironolactone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Yuancai D, WaiKiong NG, Shoucang S, Sanggu K, Reginald BH. Preparation and characterization of spironolactone nanoparticles by antisolvent precipitation. Int J Pharm. 2009;375:84–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Limayem BI, Charcosset C, Sfar S, Fessi H. Preparation and characterization of spironolactone-loaded nanocapsules for pediatric use. Int J Pharm. 2006;325:124–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Niazi S. Textbook of biopharmaceutics and clinical pharmacokinetics. New York: Appleton; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao N, Augsburger LL. Functionality comparison of 3 classes of superdisintegrants in promoting aspirin tablet disintegration and dissolution. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6:E634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao N, Augsburger LL. The influence of granulation on superdisintegrant performance. Pharm Dev Technol. 2006;11:47–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Massimo G, Catellani PL, Santi P, Bettini R, Vaona G, Bonfanti A, et al. Disintegration propensity of tablets evaluated by means of disintegrating force kinetics. Pharm Dev Technol. 2000;5:163–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrero C, Munoz N, Velasco M, Muñoz-Ruiz A, Jimenez Castellanos R. Disintegrating efficiency of croscarmellose sodium in a direct compression formulation. Int J Pharm. 1997;147(11).

  8. Gohel RK, Parikh RK, Brahmbhatt BK, Shah AR. Preparation and assessment of novel coprocessed superdisintegrant consisting of crospovidone and sodium starch glycolate: a technical note. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2007;8:E63–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rojas J, Kumar V. Assessment of the effect of spray-drying on the powder and tableting properties of microcrystalline cellulose II. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2011;2:276–84.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rojas J, Lopez A, Gamboa Y, Gonzales C, Montoya F. Assessment of processing and polymorphic form effect on the powder and tableting properties of microcrystalline celluloses I and II. Chem Pharm Bull. 2011;59:603–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rojas J, Kumar V. Effect of polymorphic form on the functional properties of cellulose: a comparative study. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87:2223–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Edge S, Steele DF, Staniforth JN, Chen A, Woodcock P. Powder compaction properties of sodium starch glycolate disintegrants. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28:989–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao N, Augsburger LL. The influence of swelling capacity of superdisintegrants in different pH media on the dissolution of hydrochlorothiazide from directly compressed tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2005;6:E120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weibull W. Dissolution of fluorocortisone from phospholipid coprecipitates. J Appl Mech. 1951;18:293–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pharmacopoeial Convention and the National Formulary. “United States PharmacopoeiaThe Standard of Quality”, USP32/NF27, United States Pharmacopoeial Convention, New York; 2009.

  16. Fell JT, Newton JM. The tensile strength of lactose tablets. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1968;20:657–758.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bi YX, Sunada H, Yonezawa Y, Danjo K. Evaluation of rapidly disintegrating tablets prepared by a direct compression method. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1999;95:571–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Troy DV, Hauber MJ, editors. Remington, the science and practice of pharmacy. 21st ed. Washington, D.C.: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rojas J. Assessment of co-processing of cellulose II and silicon dioxide as a platform to enhance excipient functionality. PhD thesis. 2011, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, 336.

  20. Quadir A, Kolter K. A comparative study of current superdisintegrants. Pharm Technol. 2006;10:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gonnissen Y, Remon JP, Vervaet C. Effect of maltodextrin and superdisintegrant in directly compressible powder mixtures prepared via co-spray drying. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;68:277–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitrevej A, Faroongsarng D, Sinchaipanid N. Compression behavior of spray dried rice starch. Int J Pharm. 1996;140:61–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. German ML, Blumenfeld AL, Guenin YV, Yuryev VP, Tolstoguzov VB. Structure formation in systems containing amylose, amylopectin, and their mixtures. Carbohydr Polym. 1992;18:27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the staff of the University of Antioquia pilot plant for providing us with the resources needed to conduct this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Rojas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rojas, J., Guisao, S. & Ruge, V. Functional Assessment of Four Types of Disintegrants and their Effect on the Spironolactone Release Properties. AAPS PharmSciTech 13, 1054–1062 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9835-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9835-y

KEY WORDS

Navigation