Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement

  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The relation of primary cognitive appraisals to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, task engagement, and perceived stress was examined in 56 men (ages 18–29). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, preejection period, stroke index, cardiac index, and total peripheral resistance were assessed at rest and during performance of a computerized mental arithmetic task. Extending on prior investigations, threat and challenge appraisals were assessed independently from one another and from secondary appraisals. Positive and negative affect, task engagement, and levels of perceived stress were also assessed. Results indicated that threat (R2 = .08, p = .01), challenge (R2 = .14, p = .003), and their interaction (R2 = .11, p = .006) independently predicted DBP reactivity; DBP responses were greatest among participants with a high threat/low challenge pattern of appraisal. Threat appraisals predicted greater negative affect (R2 = .32) and perceived stress (R2 = .48), whereas challenge appraisals were related to greater positive affect (R2 = .44) and task engagement (R2 = .40, ps < .0001). Greater positive affect was correlated with increased SBP and DBP reactivity, and greater levels of task engagement with increased DBP response (ps ≤ .002). Results suggest that primary cognitive appraisals are more potent predictors of affect and task engagement than cardiovascular reactivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krantz DS, Manuck SB: Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: A review and methodologic critique.Psychological Bulletin. 1984,96:435–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Manuck SB: Cardiovascular reactivity in cardiovascular disease: “Once more unto the breach“.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1994,1:4–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frijda NH:The Emotions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lazarus RS, Folkman S:Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Houston BK: Personality characteristics, reactivity, and cardiovascular disease. In Turner JR, Sherwood A, Light K (eds),Individual Differences in Cardiovascular Response to Stress. New York: Plenum, 1992, 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Manuck SB, Kasprowicz AL, Monroe SB, Larkin KT, Kaplan JR: Psychophysiological reactivity as a dimension of individual differences. In Schneiderman N, Weiss SB, Kaufmann P (eds),Handbook of Methods and Measurements in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine. New York: Plenum, 1989, 365.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peacock EJ, Wong PTP: The Stress Appraisal Measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal.Stress Medicine. 1990,6:227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Waldstein SR, Neumann SA, Burns HO, Maier KJ: Role-played interpersonal interaction: Ecological validity and cardiovascular reactivity.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1998,20:302–309.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sherwood A, Turner RJ: Hemodynamic responses during psychological stress: Implications for studying disease process.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1995,2:193–218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sherwood A, Dolan CA, Light KC: Hemodynamics of blood pressure responses during active and passive coping.Psychophysiology. 1990,27:656–668.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey RM, Leitten CL: Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993,65:248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartley TR, Ginsburg GP, Heffner K: Self presentation and cardiovascular reactivity.International Journal of Psychophysiology. 1999,32:75–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Quigley KS, Barrett LF, Weinstein S: Cardiovascular patterns associated with threat and challenge appraisals: A within-subjects analysis.Psychophysiology. 2002,39:292–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelsey RM, Blascovich J, Leitten CL, et al.: Cardiovascular reactivity and adaptation to recurrent psychological stress: The moderating effects of evaluative observation.Psychophysiology. 2000,37:748–756.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kibler J, Ernst JM: Cognitive and physiological antecedents of threat and challenge appraisal.Journalof Personality and Social Psychology. 1997,73:63–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Feldman PJ, Cohen S, Lepore SJ, et al.: Negative emotions and acute physiological response to stress.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:216–222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerin W, Bovbjerg DH, Glynn L, et al.: Comment on “Negative Emotions and Acute Cardiovascular Responses to Laboratory Challenges”.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1999,21:223–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwartz GE, Weinberger DA, Singer JA: Cardiovascular differentiation of happiness, sadness, anger, and fear following imagery and exercise.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1981,43:343–364.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinha R, Lovallo WR, Parsons OA: Cardiovascular differentiation of emotions.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1992,54:422–435.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Neumann SA, Waldstein SR: Similar patterns of cardiovascular response during emotional activation as a function of affective valence and arousal and gender.Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2001,50:245–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Krantz DS, Manuck SB, Wing RR: Psychological stressors and task variables as elicitors of reactivity. In Matthews KA, Weiss SM, Detre T, et al. (eds),Handbook of Stress, Reactivity, and Cardiovascular Disease. New York: Wiley, 1986, 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manuck SB, Morrison RL, Bellack AS, Poleferone JM: Behavioral factors in hypertension: Cardiovascular responsivity, anger, and social competence. In Chesney MA, Rosenman RH (eds),Anger and Hostility in Cardiovascular and Behavioral Disorders. Washington: Hemisphere, 1985, 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tomaka J, Palacios-Esquivel RL: Motivational systems and stress-related cardiovascular reactivity.Motivation and Emotion. 1997,21:275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Waldstein SR, Bachen EA, Manuck SB: Active coping and cardiovascular reactivity: A multiplicity of influences.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1997,59:620–625.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stone AA, Neale JM, Shiffman S: Daily assessments of stress and coping and their association with mood.Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1993,15:8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peacock EJ, Wong PTP, Reker GT: Relations between appraisals and coping schemas: Support for the congruence model.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Neuroscience. 1991,25:64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Monroe SM, Kelley JM: Measurement of stress appraisal. In Cohen S, Kessler RC, Underwood-Gordon L (eds),Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997, 122–147.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company:Statistical Bulletin. 1983,64:2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988,54:1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sherwood A, Allen MT, Fahrenberg J, et al.: Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography.Psychophysiology. 1990,27:1–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Manuck SB, Polefrone JM, Terrell DF, et al.: Absence of enhanced sympathoadrenal activity and behaviorally evoked cardiovascular reactivity among offspring of hypertensives.American Journal of Hypertension. 1996,9:248–255.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Muldoon MF, Bachen EA, Manuck SB, et al.: Acute cholesterol responses to mental stress and change in posture.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1992,152:775–780.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Debski TT, Kamarck TW, Jennings JR, et al.: A computerized test battery for the assessment of cardiovascular reactivity.International Journal of Biomedical Computers. 1991,27:277–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson PP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH: Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiograph system.Aerospace Medicine. 1966,37:1208–1212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Aiken LS, West SG:Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Keys A, Taylor HL, Blackburn J, et al.: Mortality and coronary heart disease among men studied for 23 years.Archives of Internal Medicine. 1971,128:201–214.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Falkner B, Kushner H, Onesti G, Angelakos ET: Cardiovascular characteristics in adolescents who develop essential hypertension.Hypertension. 1981,3:521–527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Suarez EC, Williams RB: The relationships between dimensions of hostility and cardiovascular reactivity as a function of task characteristics.Psychosomatic Medicine. 1990,52:558–570.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Everson SA, Mckey BS, Lovallo WR: Effect of trait hostility on cardiovascular responses to harassment in young men.International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 1995,2:172–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith TW, Christensen AJ: Cardiovascular reactivity and interpersonal relations: Psychosomatic processes in social context.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 1992,11:279–301.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 1000 Hill top Circle, 21250, Balti-more, MD

    Karl J. Maier M.A., Shari R. Waldstein Ph.D. & Stephen J. Synowski B.A.

  2. Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine & Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, USA

    Shari R. Waldstein Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Karl J. Maier M.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shari R. Waldstein Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen J. Synowski B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shari R. Waldstein Ph.D..

Additional information

This study was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant R29 AG15112 to Shari R. Waldstein.

About this article

Cite this article

Maier, K.J., Waldstein, S.R. & Synowski, S.J. Relation of cognitive appraisal to cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and task engagement. ann. behav. med. 26, 32–41 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_05

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_05

Keywords

Search

Navigation