Skip to main content
Log in

Metrics Implementation in an Industry-Based Medical Information Department and Comparison to Metrics Tracked within Other Industry-Based Medical Information Departments

  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There was no formal metrics system in place for the medical information (MI) department at Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Therefore, the MI department of Solvay sought to develop a formal metrics system for accurately capturing and reporting workload statistics.

A preimplementation survey was administered to assess the impression of MI core function workload including medical response letters, medical inquiries, and promotional review. Monthly workload statistics were captured for each MI team member, and averages at 3 and 6 months were compared to preimplementation survey averages. Another survey gathered information regarding workload tracking practices in other industry-based MI departments.

The majority (60–65%) of metrics captured were inconsistent with presurvey perceived averages. The formal metrics system implemented at Solvay more accurately depicts workload and the accomplishments of MI employees, enables better prediction of staffing requirements, and is consistent with workload monitoring practices of other pharmaceutical industry companies surveyed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Helms RW, Fitzmartin R, Fillow PJ, Miller SA, Talley LM, Murphy R. Metrics and best practices in clinical data management: conclusions of a DIA roundtable workshop. Drug Inf J. 2001;35: 681–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams-Wendling L. Clocking care hours with workload measurement tools. Nurs Manage. 2003;34(8):34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh E. Get real with workload measurement. Nurs Manage. 2003;34(2):38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schommer JC, Mott DA, Schneider PJ, Knoell KR. Performance measurement of a pharmacist directed anticoagulation management service. Hasp Pharm. 2001;36:1164–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marrone CM. Heck AM. Impact of a drug information service practitioner hours saved. Hosp Pharm. 2000;35:1065–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rinke RR, Chaffee BW. Automated system for documenting pharmacy workload. ASHP Annual Meeting. June 1991;48:P–138D.

  7. Johnston P, Hatwich W. Use of a pharmacist pocket card to capture and evaluate clinical workload. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting. Dec 1989;24: MCS–58.

  8. Toohey JB. Herrick JD, Trautman RT. Adaptation of a workload measurement system. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1982;39:999–1004.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanscoy GJ. Giudici RA, Mattei TJ. Development of a model for predicting pharmacy personnel requirements. Hosp Pharm. 1987;22:453–456, 464.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubino M. Distributive and clinical activity measurement using spreadsheet software. Hosp Pharm. 1990:25:731–735.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Trudeau T. A simple work measurement system that can aid in effective production planning Hosp Pharm. 1980;15:229–233.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boak LR. Workload measurement Can J Hosp Pharm. 1988;41:205–210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SD, Donnelly AJ. Use of management tools to assess departmental productivity status. ASHP Annual Meeting. June 1992;49:P–45D.

  14. Spravzoff SR, Dalton DW. Development and utilization of a productivity monitoring system to forecast daily staffing requirements and optimize departmental effectiveness. ASHP Annual Meeting. June 1994;51:MCS–19.

  15. Albano DL, Acri PM, Margolis MD, O’Neill SL, Santhouse A. Applying metrics to employee work performance in a drug information center. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting. Dec 2000;35:P–7D.

  16. American Society for Health System Pharmacists. ASHP Section of Pharmacy Practice Managers 2005 reports to House of Delegates. Available at http://www.ashp.org/emplibrary/Section%20Reports%20to%20House%20of%20Delegates%202005.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2006.

  17. American Society for Health System Pharmacists. Pharmacy management position statement 0406: workload monitoring and reporting. Available at http://www.ashp.org/bestpractices/pharm-mgmt/Mgmt_Positions.pdf. Accessed June 6, 2006.

  18. ASHP summer meeting tackles key pharmacy issues. US Pharm. 2004;29(8):HS 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shannon ME. Malecha SE, Cha AJ, Moody ML. Evaluation and critical appraisal of a random sample of drug information practice in United States academic and industry medical information centers. Drug Inf J. 2000;34:1133–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hopkins F, Gallidher C, Levine A. Medical affairs and drug information practices within the pharmaceutical industry: results of a benchmarking survey. Drug Inf J. 1999;33:69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Graves DA, Baker RP. The core curriculum for medical communications professionals practicing in the pharmaceutical industry. Drug Inf J. 2000;34:995–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christi Marsh PharmD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soares, S.C., Marsh, C. Metrics Implementation in an Industry-Based Medical Information Department and Comparison to Metrics Tracked within Other Industry-Based Medical Information Departments. Ther Innov Regul Sci 42, 175–182 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150804200209

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150804200209

Key Words

Navigation