Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the brand value-shareholder value nexus for consumer goods companies

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally claimed that brand names are a corporate asset with an economic value that creates wealth for a firm’s shareholders. However, the scholarly literature has neither provided a comprehensive theoretical basis for this claim nor documented an empirical relationship between brand value and shareholder value. This exploratory study describes a rationale for, and documents, the statistical strength and functional form of a brand value-shareholder value relationship for publicly held consumer goods companies in the United States. A theoretical argument supportive of a positive relationship between a firm’s accumulated brand value and market-to-book (M/B) ratio was empirically validated. However, even though firms with higher accumulated brand values have higher M/B ratios, the functional form of the relationship was found to be concave with decreasing returns to scale. Theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are outlined, as well as study limitations and directions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. 1991.Managing Brand Equity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1996.Building Strong Brands. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Robert Jacobson. 1994. “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (May): 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, David. 1997. “Brand Strength Analysis.” InBrand Valuation, 3rd ed. Ed. Raymond Perrier. London: Premier Books, 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badenhausen, Kurt. 1996. “Blind Faith.”Financial World 165 (July 8): 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. “Most Valuable Brands.”Financial World 166 (October 8): 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, Mary E. and Wayne R. Landsman. 1995. “Fundamental Issues Related to Using Fair Value Accounting for Financial Reporting.”Accounting Horizons 9 (December): 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Patrick, Christopher Higson, Andrew Likierman, and Paul Marsh. 1990. “Brands as ‘Separable Assets’.”Business Strategy Review 1 (Summer): 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Behind the Numbers.” 1996.Financial World 165 (July 8): 54–55.

  • Biel, Alexander L. 1993. “Converting Image Into Equity.” InBrand Equity and Advertising. Eds. David A. Aaker and Alexander L. Biel. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkin, Michael. 1994. “Assessing Brand Value.” InBrand Power. Ed. Paul Stobart. New York: New York University Press, 209–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, Tom, Tim Keller, and Jack Murrin. 1994.Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, Tom and Sandra Moriarity. 1997.Driving Brand Value. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egginton, Don A. 1990. “Toward Some Principles for Intangible Asset Accounting.”Accounting and Business Research 20:193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, Eugene F. 1970. “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.”Journal of Finance 25 (December): 383–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. “Efficient Capital Markets: II.”Journal of Finance 46 (December): 1575–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “TheFortune 500”. 1996.Fortune, April 29, pp. F1–F19.

  • “TheFortune 500.” 1997.Fortune, April 28, pp. F1–F23.

  • Glover, Christopher. 1997. “Alternative Methods of Brand Valuation.” InBrand Valuation, 3rd ed. Ed. Raymond Perrier. London: Premier Books, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grand Metropolitan Annual Report 1996. 1997. London: Grand Metropolitan, PLC.

  • Haigh, David and Raymond Perrier. 1997, “Valuation of Trademarks and Brand Names.” InBrand Valuation, 3rd ed. Ed. Raymond Perrier. London: Premier Books, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschey, Mark and Jerry Weygandt. 1985. “Amortization Policy for Advertising and Research and Development Expenditures.”Journal of Accounting Research 23 (Spring): 326–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, Jean-Noël. 1997.Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term. 2nd ed. Dover, NH: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Kevin Lane. 1998.Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerin, Roger A., Vijay Mahajan, and P. Rajan Varadarajan. 1990.Contemporary Perspectives on Strategic Market Planning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczmarski & Associates. 1996.Brand Asset Management for the 1990s. Chicago.

  • Lane, Vicki and Robert Jacobson. 1995. “Stock Market Reactions to Brand Extension Announcements: The Effects of Brand Attitude and Familiarity.”Journal of Marketing 59 (January): 63–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefton, Terry with Weston Anson. 1996. “How Much Is Your Brand Worth?”Brandweek, January 29, pp. 43–44.

  • Lev, Baruch. 1997. “Announcing the Foundation of the Intangibles Research Center at the Vincent C. Ross Institute of Accounting Research.”Accounting Horizons 11 (March): 136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, Eric and Stephen Ross. 1981. “Tobin’sq Ratio and Industrial Organization.”Journal of Business 54 (January): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longman, Kenneth A. 1995. “Valuing a Brand.”Journal of Brand Management 2 (April): 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschi, Robert L. 1995. “Value Added: Refinements in Our Brand Valuation Methodology.”Financial World 164 (August 1): 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Financial Economics 20 (2): 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Betsy. 1996. “The Brand’s the Thing.”Fortune, March 4, pp. 72–76.

  • Murphy, John. 1989.Brand Valuation. London: Century Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, Stewart. 1993. “The Landor Image Power Survey: A Global Assessment of Brand Strength.” InBrand Equity and Advertising. Eds. David A. Aaker and Alexander L. Biel. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri, Shaifoli. 1997. “Warning: Buying Philip Morris Could Be Habit-Forming.”Fortune, April 28, pp. 394, 396.

  • Schlossberg, Howard. 1990. “Brand Value Can Be Worth More Than Physical Assets.”Marketing News, March 5, p. 6.

  • Schuetze, Walter P. 1993. “What Is an Asset?”Accounting Horizons 7 (September): 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish N. and Rajendra S. Sisodia. 1995. “Feeling the Heat.”Marketing Management 4 (Fall): 8–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Carol J. and Mary W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach.”Marketing Science 12 (Winter): 28–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Geoffrey N. 1994. “What’s in a Name?”Financial World 163 (August 2): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomons, David. 1995. “Criteria for Choosing an Accounting Model.”Accounting Horizons 9 (March): 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, Rajendra K., Tassadduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey. 1998. “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis.”Journal of Marketing 62 (January): 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, James. 1969. “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory.”Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 1 (February): 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978. “Monetary Policies and the Economy: The Transmission Mechanism.”Southern Economic Journal 37 (April): 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varaiya, Nikhil, Roger A. Kerin, and David Weeks. 1987. “The Relationship Between Growth, Profitability, and Firm Value.”Strategic Management Journal 8 (September–October): 487–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yovovich, B. G. 1988. “What Is a Brand Really Worth?”Adweek’s Marketing Week, August 8, pp. 18–20, 24.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southern Methodist University, Dallas, USA

    Roger A. Kerin & Raj Sethuraman

Authors
  1. Roger A. Kerin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raj Sethuraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Roger A. Kerin (Ph.D., University of Minnesota) is the Harold C. Simmons distinguished professor of marketing at the Edwin L. Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University. His research focuses on marketing strategy and product management issues. He has published more than 50 articles appearing in such journals as theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Research, Strategic Management Journal, andManagement Science, in addition to authoring four books. He presently serves on numerous editorial review boards and is a former editor of theJournal of Marketing.

Raj Sethuraman obtained his Ph.D. from Northwestern University and is an assistant professor at the Edwin L. Cox School of Business, Southern Methodist University. His research focuses on competitive marketing strategies, especially price and advertising strategies. He has published in several journals including theJournal of Marketing Research, Management Science, Marketing Letters, theJournal of Business Research, and theJournal of Consumer Psychology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerin, R.A., Sethuraman, R. Exploring the brand value-shareholder value nexus for consumer goods companies. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 26, 260–273 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398264001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070398264001

Keywords

Search

Navigation