Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linking employee confidence to performance: A study of self-managing service teams

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing implementation of self-managing teams (SMTs) in service delivery suggests the importance of developing confidence beliefs about a team’s collective competence. This research examined causality in the linkage between employee confidence beliefs and performance for boundary-spanning SMTs delivering financial services. The authors distinguish between task-specific (i.e., team efficacy) and generalized (i.e., group potency) employee confidence, as well as between customer-based (i.e., customer-perceived service quality) and financial (i.e., service revenues) performance. They analyzed employee and customer survey data as well as financial performance data from 51 SMTs at two points in time using lagged analyses. The findings reveal divergent results for team efficacy and group potency, suggesting that team efficacy has reciprocal, causal relationships with service revenues and customer-perceived service quality. In contrast, group potency has no causal relationship with service revenues. Finally, customer-perceived service quality predicts group potency, whereas no evidence for the reverse effect is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Nathalie J. and Douglas B. Grisaffe. 2001. “Employee Commitment to the Organization and Customer Reactions: Mapping the Linkages.”Human Resource Management Review 11 (3): 209–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach.”Psychological Bulletin 103 (3): 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, Albert. 1986.Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. “Collective Efficacy.” InSelf-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Ed. Albert Bandura. New York: Freeman, 477–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, Rajiv D., Joy M. Field, Roger G. Schroeder, and Kingshuk K. Sinha. 1996. “Impact of Work Teams on Manufacturing Performance: A Longitudinal Field Study.”Academy of Management Journal 39 (4): 867–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batt, Rosemary. 1999. “Work Organization, Technology and Performance in Customer Service and Sales.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52 (4): 539–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, Kenneth L., Naveen Donthu, and Pamela A. Kennett. 2000. “A Longitudinal Analysis of Satisfaction and Profitability.”Journal of Business Research 47 (2): 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, Paul D. 2000. “Within-Group Agreement, Non-Independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis.” InMultilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations. Eds. Katherine J. Klein and Stephen W. J. Kozlowski. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 349–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth A. 1989.Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Ruth N. and James H. Drew. 1991. “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Attitudes.”Journal of Marketing 55 (1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, Trevor S. and Adrian Pagan. 1980. “The LM Test and Its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics.”Review of Economic Studies 47:239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Steven P., William L. Cron, and John W. Slocum, Jr. 1998. “Effects of Trait Competitiveness and Perceived Intraorganizational Competition on Salesperson Goal Setting and Performance.”Journal of Marketing 62 (October): 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Shankar Ganesan, and Goutam Challagalla. 2001. “Self-Efficacy as a Moderator of Information-Seeking Effectiveness.”Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (5): 1043–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, Michael A., Gina J. Medsker, and Catherine A. Higgs. 1993. “Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Teams.”Personnel Psychology 46:823–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • , Ellen M. Papper, and Gina J. Medsker. 1996. “Relations Between Work Team Characteristics and Effectiveness: A Replication and Extension.”Personnel Psychology 49 (2): 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Susan G. and Daniel R. Denison. 1990. “Flight Attendant Teams.” InGroups That Work (and Those That Don’t): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork. Ed. J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 382–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deeter-Schmelz, Dawn R. and Rosemary P. Ramsey. 2003. “An Investigation of Team Information Processing in Service Teams: Exploring the Link Between Teams and Customers.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 31:409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, Ad, Ko de Ruyter, and Jos G.A.M. Lemmink. 2004. “Antecedents and Consequences of the Service Climate in Boundary-Spanning Self-Managing Service Teams.”Journal of Marketing 68 (2): 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, Dov. 1990.Pygmalion in Management: Productivity as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, Charles R. and Lawrence D. Fredenhall. 2002. “The Effect of Teams on Firm Profitability and Customer Satisfaction.”Journal of Service Research 4 (3): 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, Cristina B. 1999. “Do They Do What They Believe They Can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Tasks and Cultures.”Academy of Management Journal 42 (2): 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, Lucy L., Christina E. Shalley, and Terry C. Blum. 2001. “Team and Organizational Attitudes as a Lens and Mirror Impacting Customer Satisfaction: An Empirical Test in Self-Managed Teams.”Journal of Quality Management 6:235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gully, Stanley M., Aparna Joshi, Kara A. Incalcaterra, and J. Mattew Beaubien. 2002. “A Meta-Analysis of Team-Efficacy, Potency, and Performance: Interdependence and Level of Analysis as Moderators of Observed Relationships.”Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (5): 819–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, Richard A., Paul R. Yost, Richard J. Campbell, and Gregory P. Shea. 1993. “Potency in Groups: Articulating a Construct.”British Journal of Social Psychology 32:87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, James K., Frank L. Schmidt, and Theodore L. Hayes. 2002. “Business-Unit-Level Relationship Between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis.”Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2): 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartline, Michael D. and O. C. Ferrell. 1996. “The Management of Customer-Contact Service Employees: An Empirical Investigation.”Journal of Marketing 60 (4): 52–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, James L., W. Earl Sasser, and Leonard A. Schlesinger. 1997.The Service Profit Chain. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, Christian and Ruth M. Stock. 2004. “The Link Between Salespeople’s Job Satisfaction and Customer Satisfaction in a Business-to-Business Context: A Dyadic Analysis.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32:144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, Lawrence R., Robert G. Demaree, and Gerrit Wolf. 1993. “An Assessment of Within-Group Interrater Agreement.”Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (2): 306–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. and Sörbom, Dag. 1993.LISREL 8 User’s Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Dong I. and John Sosik. 2003. “Group Potency and Collective Efficacy: Examining their Predictive Validity, Level of Analysis, and Effects of Performance Feedback on Future Group Performance.”Group & Organization Management 28 (3): 366–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, Wagner A., Vikas Mittal, Fernando de Rosa, and José Afonso Mazzon. 2002. “Assessing the Service-Profit Chain.”Marketing Science 21 (3): 294–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Cynthia, Catherine H. Tinsley, and Philip Bobko. 2002. “An Investigation of the Antecedents and Consequences of Group-Level Confidence.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32 (8): 1628–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, Scott W, Bruce M. Meglino, and M. Audrey Korsgaard. 2002. “The Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Longitudinal Investigation of Newly Formed Work Groups.”Academy of Management Journal 45 (2): 352–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, Dana H., Daniel J. Brass, and James B. Thomas. 1995. “Efficacy-Performance Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective.”Academy of Management Review 20:645–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, Vikas, William T. Ross, Jr., and Michael Tsiros. 2002. “The Role of Issue Valence and Issue Capability in Determining Effort Investment.”Journal of Marketing Research 39 (4): 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed, Susan, John E. Mathieu, and A. L. “Bart” Bartlett. 2002. “Technical-Administrative Task Performance, Leadership Performance and Contextual Performance: Considering the Influence of Team-and Task-Related Composition Variables.”Journal of Organizational Behavior 23:795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, John, Michael H. Kutner, Christopher J. Nachtsheim, and William Wasserman. 1996.Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Valerie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry. 1988. “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality.”Journal of Retailing 64 (1): 12–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Erika, Terence R. Mitchell, Leigh Thompson, and Renu Burr. 2000. “Collective Efficacy and Aspects of Shared Mental Models as Predictors of Performance Over Time in Work Groups.”Group Process & Intergroup Relations 3 (3): 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prussia, Gregory E. and Angelo J. Kinicki. 1996. “A Motivational Investigation of Group Effectiveness Using Social-Cognitive Theory.”Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (2): 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, George A. and Ervin E. Jones. 1980. “The Perception of Variability Within In-Groups and Out-Groups: Implications for the Law of Small Numbers.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38 (1): 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, Matt L. and Patrick A. Knight. 1994. “The Impact of Perceived Group Success-Failure on Motivational Beliefs and Attitudes: A Causal Model.”Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (5): 755–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Jette Warka, Bernadette Babasa, Renee Betancourt, and Stephenie Hooker. 1994. “Development and Validation of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy for Job-Related Applications.”Educational and Psychological Measurement 54:793–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, William T. 1988 “Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages: The Case of Industrial Goods Industries.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Ann Marie, Mark J. Schmit, and Raymond Johnson. 1996. “Attitudes and Effectiveness: Examining Relations at an Organizational Level.”Personnel Psychology 49:853–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers, Michaela C., Deanne N. den Hartog, Paul L. Koopman, and Janique A. Wienk. 2003. “Reflexivity and Diversity in Teams: The Moderating Effects of Outcome Interdependence and Group Longevity.”Journal of Organizational Behavior 24:779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Benjamin, Steven D. Ashworth, Andrew Higgs, and Linda Carr. 1996. “Design, Validity, and Use of Strategically Focused Employee Attitude Surveys.”Personnel Psychology 49 (3): 695–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Paul J. Hanges, D. Brent Smith, and Amy Nicole Salvaggio. 2003. “Which Comes First: Employee Attitudes or Organizational Financial and Market Performance?”Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 836–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Susan S. White, and Michelle C. Paul. 1998. “Linking Service Climate and Customer Perceptions to Service Quality: Test of a Causal Model.”Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (2): 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, Gregory P. and Richard A. Guzzo. 1987. “Group Effectiveness: What Really Matters?”Sloan Management Review 28:25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jagdip. 2000. “Performance Productivity and Quality of Frontline Employees in Service Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 64 (2): 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosik, John J., Bruce J. Aviolo, and Surinder S. Kahai. 1997. “Effects of Leadership Style and Anonymity on Group Potency and Effectiveness in a Group Decision Support System Environment.”Journal of Applied Psychology 82:89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, Gretchen M. 1995. “Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation.”Academy of Management Journal 38 (5): 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. 2003.Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.0. College Station, TX: StataCorp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. and Hans Baumgartner. 1998. “Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 25 (1): 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, Robert J. and Victor H. Vroom. 2002. “The Person Versus the Situation in Leadership.”Leadership Quarterly 13:301–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taris, Toon W. 2000.A Primer in Longitudinal Data Analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesluk, Paul E., James L. Farr, John E. Mathieu, and Robert J. Vance. 1995. “Generalization of Employee Involvement Training to the Job Setting: Individual and Situational Effects.”Personnel Psychology 48:607–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, Robert J. and Charles E. Lance. 2000. “A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research.”Organizational Research Methods 3 (1): 4–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Yperen, Nico W. and Tom A. B. Snijders. 2000. “A Multi-Level Analysis of the Demands-Control Model: Is Stress at Work Determined by Factors at the Group Level or the Individual Level?”Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5 (1): 182–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Guangping and Richard G. Netemeyer. 2002. “The Effects of Job Autonomy, Customer Demandingness, and Trait Competitiveness on Salesperson Learning, Self-Efficacy, and Performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30:217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, Robert A. 1980. “Consumer Satisfaction as a Function of Personal Competence/Efficacy.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 8:427–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, Stephen, Virginia Blair, Christopher Peterson, and Michelle Zazanis. 1995. “Collective Efficacy.” InSelf-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment. Ed. James E. Maddux. New York: Plenum, 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valerie A. 2000. “Service Quality, Profitability and the Economic Worth of Customers: What We Know and What We Need to Learn.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28:67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, Arnold. 1962. “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 57:348–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. “Estimators for Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations: Some Exact Finite Sample Results.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 58:977–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands

    Ad de Jong

  2. Maastricht University, the Netherlands

    Ko de Ruyter & Martin Wetzels

Authors
  1. Ad de Jong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ko de Ruyter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Wetzels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Ad de Jong (a.d.jong@tm.tue.nl) is an assistant professor in the Department of Organization Science & Marketing, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. His main research interests are service marketing and management, the service-profit chain, multilevel theory and research, and multichannel research. He has published in journals such asManagement Science, theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Retailing, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, Decision Sciences, theJournal of Management Studies, and theJournal of Service Research, as well as many conference proceedings.

Ko de Ruyter (k.deruyter@mw.unimaas.nl) is a professor of marketing and head of the Department of Marketing at Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. He has published six books and numerous scholarly articles in, among others, theJournal of Marketing, Management Science, theJournal of Retailing, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, Decision Sciences, Marketing Letters, theJournal of Management Studies, theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Economic Psychology, theJournal of Service Research, theInternational Journal of Service Industry Management, Information and Management, theEuropean Journal of Marketing and Accounting, andOrganisation andSociety. He serves on the editorial boards of various international academic journals, including theJournal of Service Research and theInternational Journal of Service Industry Management. His research interests concern international service management, e-commerce, and customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

Martin Wetzels (m.wetzels@mw.unimaas.nl) is a professor of marketing and supply chain research in the Department of Marketing at Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. His main research interests are customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction, customer value, services marketing, business-to-business marketing, (online) marketing research, supply chain management, cross-functional cooperation, e-commerce, new product development, technology infusion in services, and relationship marketing. His work has been published inManagement Science, Marketing Letters, the International Journal of Research in Marketing, theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Interactive Marketing, theJournal of Economic Psychology, Industrial Marketing Management, theEuropean Journal of Marketing, theJournal of Management Studies, andTotal Quality Management. He has contributed more than 60 papers to conference proceedings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Jong, A., de Ruyter, K. & Wetzels, M. Linking employee confidence to performance: A study of self-managing service teams. JAMS 34, 576–587 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070306287126

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070306287126

Keywords

Search

Navigation