Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research relied on a field experiment involving a real-world instance of corporate philanthropy to shed light on both the scope and limitations of the strategic returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR). In particular, the authors demonstrate that the impact of CSR in the real world is not only less pervasive than has been previously acknowledged but also more multifaceted than has been previously conceptualized. The findings indicated that contingent on CSR awareness, which was rather low, stakeholders did react positively to the focal company not only in the consumption domain but in the employment and investment domains as well. Stakeholder attributions regarding the genuineness of the company’s motives moderated these effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsop, Ronald. 2002. “For a Company, Charitable Works Are Best Carried Out Discreetly.”The Wall Street Journal January 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (December): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, Michael J., Anthony D. Miyazaki, and Kimberly A. Taylor. 2000. “The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (Spring): 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. and Sankar Sen. 2003. “Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationship With Companies.”Journal of Marketing 67 (April): 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 2004. “Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives.”California Management Review 47 (Fall): 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tom J. and Peter A. Dacin. 1997. “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 68–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, Michael G. Pratt, and David A. Whetten. 2006. “Identity, Intended Image, Construed Image, and Reputation: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Suggested Terminology.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (2): 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone. 2004 “Cone Corporate Citizenship Study.” Research Report. Boston: Cone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Thomas and Lee E. Preston. 1995. “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications.”Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 65–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, Pam Scholder, Deborah J. Webb, and Lois A. Mohr. 2006. “Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Social Responsibility Programs.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34 (2): 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, Steven. 1996. “Effects of Suspicion on Attributional Thinking and the Correspondence Bias.”Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology 70 (June): 1164–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, Mark R. and Sonya Grier. 2003. “When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism.”Journal of Consumer Psychology 13 (3): 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W., and D. B. Turban. 2000. “Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce.”Business & Society 39 (3): 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourville, John T. and V. Kasturi Rangan. 2004. “Valuing the Cause Marketing Relationship.”California Management Review 47 (Fall): 38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. 1986.Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Jill and Niraj Dawar. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers’ Attributions and Brand Evaluations in a Product-Harm Crisis.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 21 (3): 203–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Donald R., Minette E. Drumwright, and Bridgette M. Braig. 2004. “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits.”Journal of Marketing 68 (October): 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, Isabelle, and O. C. Ferrell. 2004. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32 (Winter): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Peter J., Gilbert A Churchill, Jr., and Tom Brown. 1993. “Caution in the Use of Difference Scores in Consumer Research.”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (March): 655–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Sankar and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2001. “Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility.”Journal of Marketing Research 38 (May): 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. Craig 2003. “Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?”California Management Review 45 (Summer): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B. and D. W. Greening. 1997. “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees.”Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 658–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Dave and Norm Smallwood. 2004. “Capitalizing on Capabilities.”Harvard Business Review 82 (June): 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, USA

    Sankar Sen

  2. Boston University, Boston, USA

    C. B. Bhattacharya & Daniel Korschun

Authors
  1. Sankar Sen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. B. Bhattacharya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Korschun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Sankar Sen (sankar_sen@baruch.cuny.edu) is a professor of marketing at the Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College, City University of New York. He received his Ph.D. in marketing in 1993 from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. His research focuses on consumer decision making. He is interested, more specifically, in consumer reactions to company actions, particularly in the domain of CSR. His research has appeared inCalifornia Management Review, Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Economic Theory, and others.

C. B. Bhattacharya (cb@bu.edu) received his Ph.D. in marketing from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1993 and his M.B.A. from the Indian Institute of Management in 1984. Prior to joining Boston University, he was on the faculty at the Goizueta Business School, Emory University. His specific expertise is in the areas of customer retention and the roles of CSR and organizational identification in designing marketing strategy. He served on the editorial review board of theJournal of Marketing from 2002 to 2005 and has published in journals such as theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of Marketing, Journal of Applied Psychology, andOrganization Science. He speaks frequently at many academic and business forums and won the William Novelli Best Paper Award at the Social Marketing Conference in 1997. Dr. Bhattacharya received the 2001 Broderick Prize for Research Excellence at Boston University and the Emory Williams Distinguished Teaching Award in 1995, the highest teaching award at Emory University. He is also part of the select group of faculty members onBusiness Week’s Outstanding Faculty list. Prior to his Ph.D., he worked for 3 years as a product manager for Reckitt Benkiser PLC. He has consulted for organizations such as the Hitachi Corporation, Procter & Gamble Company, Bell South, The Prudential Bank, Information Resources Inc., Airwick Industries, Silo Inc., and the High Museum of Art.

Daniel Korschun (danielk@bu.edu) is a doctoral candidate in marketing at Boston University. His current research interests include brand management, CSR, and interorganizational relationships.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. & Korschun, D. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. JAMS 34, 158–166 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284978

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284978

Keywords

Search

Navigation