Skip to main content
Log in

A three-component model of customer commitment to service providers

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although research into the determinants of service provider switching has grown in recent years, the focus has been predominantly on transactional, not relational, variables. In this research, the authors address the role of consumer commitment on consumers’ intentions to switch. Drawing from the organizational behavior literature, they build on previous service switching research by developing a switching model that includes a three-component conceptualization of customer commitment. Structural equation modeling is used to test the model based on data from a survey of 356 auto repair service customers. The authors’ results support the notion that customer commitment affects intentions to switch service providers and that the psychological states underlying that commitment may differ. As such, future marketing research should consider these different forms of commitment in understanding customer retention. The implications of this model for theory and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Jeffrey M. and Warren H. Jones. 1997. “The Conceptualization of Marital Commitment: An Integrative Analysis.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72 (5): 1177–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, Icek and Martin Fishbein. 1970. “The Prediction of Behavior From Attitudinal and Normative Variables.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 6 (4): 466–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Natalie J. and John P. Meyer. 1990. “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization.”Journal of Occupational Psychology 63 (1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1996. “Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity.”Journal of Vocational Behavior 49 (3): 252–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee, Samuel, Pawan S. Budhwar, and Zhen Xiong Chen 2002. “Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model.”Journal of Organizational Behavior 23 (3): 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. and Youjae Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (Winter): 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, Harvir S. and Shirley F. Taylor. 1999a. “Beyond Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction: Investigating Additional Antecedents of Service Provider Switching Intentions.” InDevelopments in Marketing Science, Vol. 22 Ed. Charles H. Noble. Coral Gables, FL: Academy of Marketing Science, 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1999b “The Service Provider Switching Model (SPSM): A Model of Consumer Switching Behavior in the Services Industry.”Journal of Service Research 2 (2): 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Karen and Carlene Wilson. 2001. “Have We Studies, Should We Study and Can We Study the Development of Commitment? Methodological Issues and the Developmental Study of Work Related Commitment.”Human Resource Management Review 11 (3): 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, Neeli and Leonard L. Berry. 1997. “Customers’ Motivations for Maintaining Relationships With Service Providers.”Journal of Retailing 73 (1): 15–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Leonard L. and A. Parasuraman. 1991.Marketing Serices. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, Lance A. 1997. “Customer Voluntary Performance: Customers as Partners in Service Delivery.”Journal of Retailing 73 (3): 383–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B. 1998. “When Customers Are Members: Customer Retention in Paid Membership Contexts.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26 (1): 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienstock, Carol C., John T. Mentzer, and Monroe M. Bird. 1997. “Measuring Physical Distribution Service Quality.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (Winter): 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth A. 1989.Structural Equations With latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Ruth. 1998. “A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer’s Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider.”Marketing Science 17 (1): 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, P. K. Kannan, and Matthew D. Bramlett. 2000. “Implications of Loyalty Program Membership and Service Experiences for Customer Retention and Value.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (1): 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, William F. 1991. “The Next Generation of Moderator Research in Personality Psychology.”Journal of Personality 59 (2): 143–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clugston, Michael. 2000. “The Mediating Effects of Multidimensional Commitment on Job Satisfaction and Intent to Leave”Journal of Organizational Behavior 21 (4): 477–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsch, Michael J., Scott R. Swanson, and Scott W. Kelley. 1998. “The Role of Relationship Quality in the Stratification of Vendors as Perceived by Customers.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26 (2): 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube, Laurette and Stowe Shoemaker. 2000. “Brand Switching and Loyalty for Services.” InHandbook of Services Marketing and Management. Eds. Teresa A. Swartz and Dawn Iacobucci. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 381–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, Robert, Paul Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer Seller Relationships.”Journa of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, Martin and Icek Ajzen. 1980.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes. 1992. “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience.”Journal of Marketing 56 (January): 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, Ellen and Mark S. Johnson. 1999. “The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationship.”Journal of Marketing 63 (April): 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, David I. and Daniel C. Bello. 2002. “Two Sides to Attitudinal Commitment: The Effect of Calculative and Loyalty Commitment on Enforcement Mechanisms in Distribution Channels.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (1): 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, Thomas W., John O. Summers, and Frank Acito. 2000. “Relationship Marketing Activities, Commitment, and Membership Behaviors in Professional Associations.”Journal of Marketing 64 (July): 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, Gregory T., Ravi S. Achrol, and John T. Mentzer. 1995. “The Structure of Commitment in Exchange.”Journal of Marketing 59 (January): 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison-Walker, L. Jean. 2001. “The Measurement of Word-of-Mouth Communication and an Investigation of Service Quality and Customer Commitment as Potential Antecedents.”Journal of Service Research 4 (1): 60–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Kevin P. Gwinner, and Dwayne D. Gremler. 2002. “Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes.”Journal of Service Research 4 (3): 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herscovitch, Lynne and John P. Meyer. 2002. “Commitment to Organizational Change: Extension of a Three-Component Model.”Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (3): 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irving, P. Gregory, Daniel F. Coleman, and Christine L. Cooper. 1997. “Further Assessments of a Three-Component Model of Occupational Commitment: Generalizalizability and Differences Across Occupations.”Journal of Applied Psychology 82 (3): 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and John P. Meyer. 1994. “Re-Examination of the Met-Expectations Hypothesis: A Longitudinal Analysis.”Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (6): 937–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael A., David L. Mothersbaugh, and Sharon E. Beatty. 2000. “Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Service.”Journal of Retailing 72 (2): 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl and Dag Sörbom. 1993.LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, Susan M. 1995. “Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John P. and Natalie J. Allen. 1997.Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John P., Natalie J. Allen, and Catherine A. Smith. 1993. “Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extenison and Test of a Three-Component Model.”Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (4): 538–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Lynne Herscovitch. 2001. “Commitment in the Workplace: Toward a General Model.”Human Resource Management Review 11 (3): 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Catherine A. Smith. 2000. “HRM Practices and Organizational Commitment: Test of a Mediation Model.”Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 17 (4): 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, David J. Stanley, Lynne Herscovitch, and Laryssa Topolnytsky. 2002. “Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences.”Journal of Vocational Behavior 61 (1): 20–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine, Gerald Zaltman, and Rohit Deshpande. 1992. “Relationships Between Providers and Users of Marketing Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations.”Journal of Marketing Research 29 (August): 314–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Robert M. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1994. “The Commiment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 58 (July): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. 1978.Psychometric Theory. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. and John E. Swan. 1989. “Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: Field Survey Approach.”Journal of Marketing 53 (April): 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, Charles, III. and Jennifer Chatman. 1986. “Organizational Commitment and Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification, and Internalization on Prosocial Behavior.”Journal of Applied Psychology 71 (3): 492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, Dennis W. 1988.Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ping, Robert A., Jr. 1993. “The Effects of Satisfaction and Structural Constraints on Retailer Exiting, Voice, Loyalty, Opportunism, and Neglect.”Journal of Retailing 69 (3): 320–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1995. “A Parsimonious Estimating Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (August): 336–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, Mark P., Mark E. Havitz, and Dennis R. Howard. 1999. “Analyzing the Commitment-Loyalty Link in Service Contexts.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (3): 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Kristy E. and Mark J. Arnold. 2000. “Customer Loyalty to the Salesperson and the Store: Examining Relationship Customers in an Upscale Retail Context.”Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 20 (Spring): 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, Linda, Robert Eisenberger, and Stephen Armeli. 2001. “Affective Commitment to the Organization: The Contribution of Perceived Organizational Support.”Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (5): 825–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodie, Amy R. and Susan S. Kleine. 2000. “Customer Participation in Services Production and Delivery.” InHandbook of Services Marketing and Management. Eds. Teresa A. Swartz and Dawn Iacobucci. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Neeru and Paul G. Patterson. 2000. “Switching Costs, Alternative Attractiveness and Experience as Moderators of Relationship Commitment in Professional, Consumer Services.”International Journal of Service Industry Management 11 (5): 470–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, Lynn M. and Sandy J. Wayne. 1993. “Commitment and Employee Behavior: Comparison of Affective and Continuance Commitment With Perceived Organizational Support.”Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (5): 774–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Shirley F. and Peter A. Todd. 1995. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models.”Information Systems Research 6 (June): 144–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, Peter C., Philip Hans Franses, and Janny C. Hoekstra. 2002. “The Effect of Relational Constructs on Customer Referrals and Number of Services Purchased From a Multiservice Provider: Does Age of Relationship Matter?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (3): 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, George W. and Steven D. Papamarcos. 2002. “Social Capital and Organizational Commitment.”Journal of Business and Psychology 16 (4): 537–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels, Martin, Ko de Ruyter, and Jos Lemmink. 2000. “Antecedents and Consequences of Service Quality in Business-to-Business Services.” InHandbook of Services Marketing and Management. Eds. Teresa A. Swartz and Dawn Iacobucci. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Marcel van Birgelen. 1998. “Marketing Service Relationships: The Role of Commitment.”Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 13 (4/5): 406–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, Susan S. and Benjamin Schneider. 2000. “Climbing the Commitment Ladder: The Role of Expectations Disconfirmation on Customers’ Behavioral Intentions.”Journal of Service Research 2 (3): 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitener, E. M. 1993. “Exchange Theory Determinants of Affective and Continuance Commitment and Turnover.”Journal of Vocational Behavior 42 (3): 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousef, Darwish A. 2000. “Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Attitudes Toward Organizational Change in a Non-Western Setting.”Personnel Review 29 (5–6): 567–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valarie A., Leonard L. Berry, and A. Parasuraman. 1996. “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality.”Journal of Marketing 60 (April): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Havir S. Bansal (hbansal@wlu.ca) is an associate professor of marketing at Wilfrid Laurier University. He earned his Ph.D. from Queen’s University in 1997. His research interests are focused in the area of services marketing with emphasis on cuctomer switching behavior, word-of-mouth processes in services, and tourism. His research has been published in theJournal of Service Research, theJournal of Quality Management, andPsychology and Marketing and has publications forthcoming in theJournal of Services Marketing andTouris Management. He has also presented at and published articles in the proceedings of various national and international conferences.

P. Gregory Irving (girving@wlu.ca) is an associate professor of organizational behavior at Wilfrid Laurier University. He received his Ph.D. in industrial/organizational psychology from the University of Western Ontario. His research interests included commitment and work-related attitudes, psychological contracts, and organizational recruitment and socialization. His research has appeared in a variety of journal including theJournal of Applied Psychology, Personnel Psychology, theJournal of Organizational Behavior, theJournal of Management, Human Performance, andBasic and Applied Social Psychology.

Shirley F. Taylor (Ph.D., University of British Columbia) (staylor@business.queensu.ca) is an associate professor in the School of Business at Queen’s University, where she teaches and conducts research in the area of services marketing. Her research interests include service provider loyalty and switching, customer commitment, and perceptions management of service delays. Her work has been published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Marketing, Psychology & Marketing, theJournal of Service Research, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, and theJournal of Public Policy and Marketing. She currently serves on the editorial boards of theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Business Research, and theCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bansal, H.S., Irving, P.G. & Taylor, S.F. A three-component model of customer commitment to service providers. JAMS 32, 234–250 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304263332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304263332

Keywords

Navigation