Skip to main content
Log in

Old Versus New Medications: How Much Should Be Taught?

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To address the issue of how much psychiatric residents should be taught about older medications.

Methods

Selective use of the literature, including historical overview was employed to compare and contrast old and newer generation medications.

Results

While many old drugs are truly antiquated, medications such as typical antipsychotics tricyclic and monoamine oxidase antidepressants, and lithium should remain integral parts of a psychopharmacology teaching program.

Conclusion

A proper blending of knowledge about older and newer medications and the use of older and newer medications is in the best interest of patients in need of psychopharmcotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stauss MB (Ed.): Familiar Medical Quotations. Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jefferson JW: Old drugs for old folks. Geriatric Times 2000; 1: 13–14

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rush B: Medical Inquiries and Observations upon The Diseases of the Mind (facsimile of the Philadelphia 1812 ed.). New York, Hafner Publishing Company, 1962, 174–213

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feldman PE: Ancient psychopharmacotherapy. Bull Menninger Clin 1965; 2: 256–263

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson JRT, Abraham K, Connor KM, et al: Effectiveness of chromium in atypical depression: a placebo-controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 53: 261–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ban TA: Pharmacotherapy of mental illness: a historical analysis. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2001; 25: 709–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. MacLeod N: The bromide sleep: a new departure in the treatment of acute mania. Br Med J 1900; 1: 134–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bodkin JA, Zornberg GL, Lukas SE, Cole JO: Buprenorphine treatment of refractory depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1994; 15: 49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Warneke, L: A possible new treatment approach to obsessive-compulsive disorder (Letter to Ed.). Can J Psychiatry 1997; 42: 667–668

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jefferson, JW: Who put the benzedrine in Mrs. Murphy’s oval-tine? Geriatric Times 2001; Sept/Oct: 9–10

  11. Dwight-Johnson M, Lagomasino IT, Simpson GM: Underuse of evidence-based pharmacotherapies for affective disorders. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54: 1076–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Partial Agonism: Redefining Effectiveness Across the Spectrum of Psychotic Disorders. Irvine, Calif., CME Inc., 2003, pp 1–72

    Google Scholar 

  13. American Diabetes Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, North American Association for the Study of Obesity: Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(2): 596–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geddes J, Freemantle N, Harrison P, et al: Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: systematic overview and meta-regression analysis. BMJ 2000; 321: 1371–1376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis JM, Chen N, Glick RD: A meta-analysis of the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003; 60: 553–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leucht S, Wahlbeck K, Hamann J, Kissling W: New generation antipsychotics versus low-potency conventional antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2003; 361: 1581–1589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenheck R, Perlick D, Bingham S, et al: Effectiveness and cost of olanzapine and haloperidol in the treatment of schizophrenia. JAMA 2003; 290: 2693–2702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson IM: Meta-analytical studies on new antidepressants. Br Med J 2001; 57: 161–178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sindrup SH, Jensen TS: Efficacy of pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain: an update and effect related to mechanism of drug action. Pain 1999; 83: 389–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Geddes J, Goodwin G: Bipolar disorder: clinical uncertainty, evidence-based medicine and large-scale randomised trials. B J Psychiatry 178(suppl 41): 191–194, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goodwin FK: Pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder: trends and controversies (interview). Currents in Affective Illness 2001; 20: 5–11

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baldessarini RJ, Tondo L, Hennen J, et al: Is lithium still worth using? An update of selected recent research. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2002; 10: 59–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tondo L, Isacsson G, Baldessarini RJ: Suicidal behaviour in bipolar disorder: risk and prevention. CNS Drugs 2003; 17: 491–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Healy D: The Anti-Depressant Era. Cambridge, Mass. and London, Harvard University Press, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  25. Partington A (Ed.): The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations. 4th Edition, N.Y., Oxford University Press, 1992

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Jefferson M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jefferson, J.W. Old Versus New Medications: How Much Should Be Taught?. Acad Psychiatry 29, 162–166 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.2.162

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.2.162

Keywords

Navigation