Abstract
Objective
The authors describe a course of instruction for psychiatry residents that attempts to provide the cognitive and informational tools necessary to make scientifically grounded decision making a routine part of clinical practice.
Methods
In weekly meetings over two academic years, the course covers the psychopharmacology of various psychiatric disorders in 32 3-hour modules. The first half of each module is a case conference, and the second is a literature review of papers related to the case. The case conference focuses on the extent to which past treatment has been consistent with evidence-supported guidelines and algorithms, and the discussants make recommendations that take the relevant scientific evidence into consideration. The second half of each module focuses on two papers: 1) a published guideline, algorithm, or review article and 2) a research study.
Results
Residents absorb a comprehensive overview of recommended clinical practices and acquire skills in assessing knowledge that affects decision making. Satisfaction with the course is rated highly.
Conclusion
The course appears useful by its face validity, but research comparing the attitudes and practice outcomes of graduates of this course compared with recipients of other training methods is needed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, et al: Users’ guides to the medical literature XXV Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the users’ guides to patient care. J the Am Med Assoc 2000; 284: 1290–1296
Geyman JP, Deyo RA, Ramsey SD: Evidence-based clinical practice: concepts and approaches. Boston, Mass., Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000
Lenfant C: Clinical research to clinical practice — lost in translation? New England J Med 2003; 349: 868–874
Jencks SF, Cuerdon T, Burwen DR, et al: Quality of medical care delivered to medicare beneficiaries: a profile at state and national levels. J the Am Med Assoc 2000; 284: 1670–1676
Solberg LI: Guideline implementation: what the literature doesn’t tell us. The Joint Commission J on Quality Improvement 2000; 26: 525–537
Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, et al: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implemetation of research findings. BMJ 1998; 317: 465–168
Goethe JW, Schwartz HI, Szarek BL: Physician compliance with practice guidelines. Connecticut Med 1997; 61: 553–558
Cannon DS, Allen SN: A comparison of the effects of computer and manual reminders on compliance with a mental health clinical practice guideline. J the Am Med Informatics Assoc 2000; 7: 196–203
Shea S, DuMouchel W, Bahamonde L: A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. J the Am Med Informatics Assoc 1996; 3: 399–409
Bauer MS: A review of quantitative studies of adherence to mental health clinical practice guidelines. Harvard Rev of Psychiatry 2002; 10: 138–153
Wazana A: Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: is a gift ever just a gift? J the Am Med Assoc 2000; 283: 373–380
Goldman CR, Cutler DL: Pharmaceutical industry support of psychiatric research and education: ethical issues and remedies, in Ethics in community mental health care: commonplace concerns. Edited by Backlar P, Cutler D. New York., Kluwer Academic Press/Plenum Publishers, 2002
Dana J, Loewenstein G: A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. J the Am Med Assoc 2003; 290: 252–255
Relman AS: Separating continuing medical education from pharmaceutical marketing. J the Am Med Assoc 2001; 285: 2009–2012
Kendell R, Jablensky A: Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 4–12
Goldner EM, Bilsker D: Evidence-based psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry 1995; 40: 97–101
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, et al: Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. It’s about integrating clinical expertise and the best external evidence. BMJ 1996; 312: 71–72
Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al: Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. J the Am Med Assoc 1999; 282: 1458–1465
Azocar F, Cuffel BD, Goldman W, et al: Dissemination of guidelines for the treatment of major depression in a managed behavioral health care network. Psychiatr Services 2001; 52: 1014–1016
Stahl SM: Does evidence from clinical trials in psychopharmacology apply in clinical practice? J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62: 6–7
Leape LL: Error in medicine. J the Am Med Assoc 1994; 272: 1851–1857
Elstein AS: Cognitive processes in clinical inference and decision making, in Reasoning, inference, and judgment in clinical psychology. Edited by Turk DC, Salovey P. New York, The Free Press, 1988
Poses RM: One size does not fit all: questions to answer before intervening to change physician behavior. Joint Commission J on Quality Improvement 1999; 25: 486–495
Berg AO: Dimensions of evidence. J the Am Board of Family Practice 1998; 11: 216–223
Ferster CE, Skinner BF: Schedules of Reinforcement. New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957
Flexner A: Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. New York, Arno Press, 1910
Bilsker D, Goldner EM: Teaching evidence-based practice in mental health. Evidence-Based Ment Health 1999; 2: 68–69
Waddell C: So much research evidence, so little dissemination and uptake: mixing the useful with the pleasing. Evidence-Based Ment Health 2001; 4: 3–5
Duckworth K, Hanson A: Using a clinical and evidence-based strategy to preserve access to psychiatric medications. Psychiatr Services 2002; 53: 1231–1232
Miser WF: Critical appraisal of the literature. J the Am Board of Family Practice 1999; 12: 315–333
Streiner DL: Sample size and power in psychiatric research. Can J Psychiatry 1990; 35: 616–620
Hadorn DC, McCormick K, Diokno A: An annotated algorithm approach to clinical guideline development. J the Am Med Assoc 1992; 267: 3311–3314
Osser DN, Patterson RD: Algorithms for psychopharmacology, in Manual of psychiatric therapeutics, third ed. Edited by Shader RI. Boston, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003
Trivedi MH, Kern JK, Baker SM, et al: Computerizing medication algorithms and decision support systems for major psychiatric disorders. J Psychiatr Practice 2000; 6: 237–246
Quitkin FM: Placebos, drug effects, and study design: a clinician’s guide. Am J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 829–836
Adli M, Berghofer A, Linden M, et al: Effectiveness and feasibility of a standardized stepwise drug treatment regimen algorithm for inpatients with depressive disorders: results of a 2-year observational algorithm study. J Clin Psychiatry 2002; 63: 782–790
Suppes T: Texas medication algorithm project, phase 3: clinical results for patients with a history of mania. J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64: 370–382
Epstein RM, Hundert EM: Defining and assessing professional competence. J the Am Med Assoc 2002; 287: 226–235
Hatala R, Guyatt G: Evaluating the teaching of evidence-based medicine. J the Am Med Assoc 2002; 288: 1110–1112
Landon BE, Normand ST, Blumenthal D, et al: Physician clinical performance assessment: prospects and barriers. J the Am Med Assoc 2003; 290: 1183–1189
Osser DN, Patterson RD, Akhter A: Impact of a psychopharmacology course that emphasizes evidence-based medicine, practice guidelines, and algorithms, poster 290 in CINP 2004 Congress, Paris,2004. Collegium Internationale Neuro-Psychopharmacologicum
American S of Clinical Psychopharmacology: Model Psychopharmacology Curriculum for Psychiatric Residency Programs, Training Directors, and Teachers of Psychopharmacology. New York, NY, American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Inc., 1997
Rieder RO: Book review of A Model Psychopharmacology Curriculum. Acad Psychiatry 2000;24: 2–3
Yank G: Book review of the model psychopharmacologycurriculum. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 952–953
Lomax JWI: Model curricula in psychiatric residency: evangelical failures or evocative facilitators? Acad Psychiatry 2001;25: 109–111
Goldberg DA: Model curricula: the way we teach, the way we learn. Acad Psychiatry 2001;25: 98–101
Glick ID, Janowsky DS, Zisook S, et al: How should we teach psychopharmacology to residents? results of the initial experiences with the ASCP model curriculum. Acad Psychiatry 2001;25: 90–97
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors thank Daniel Ioanitescu, M.D. for many useful discussions and for organizing the course evaluation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osser, D.N., Patterson, R.D. & Levitt, J.J. Guidelines, Algorithms, and Evidence-Based Psychopharmacology Training for Psychiatric Residents. Acad Psychiatry 29, 180–186 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.2.180
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.29.2.180