Skip to main content
Log in

Analytic results and weighted Monte Carlo simulations for CDO pricing

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore the possibilities of importance sampling in the Monte Carlo pricing of a structured credit derivative referred to as Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO). Modeling a CDO contract is challenging, since it depends on a pool of (typically ∼ 100) assets, Monte Carlo simulations are often the only feasible approach to pricing. Variance reduction techniques are therefore of great importance. This paper presents an exact analytic solution using Laplace-transform and MC importance sampling results for an easily tractable intensity-based model of the CDO, namely the compound Poissonian. Furthermore analytic formulas are derived for the reweighting efficiency. The computational gain is appealing, nevertheless, even in this basic scheme, a phase transition can be found, rendering some parameter regimes out of reach. A model-independent transform approach is also presented for CDO pricing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.N. Mantegna, H.E. Stanley, An Introduction to Econophysics: Correlations and Complexity in Finance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000)

  2. R. Cont, Quant. Financ. 1, 223 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.N. Mantegna, J. Kertész, New J. Phys. 13, 025011 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Global CDO Market Issuance Data (2010), http://www.sifma.org/research

  5. M. Avellaneda, R. Buff, C. Friedman, N. Grandchamp, N. Gr, L. Kruk, J. Newman, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 4, 1 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Cont, A. Minca, Working Papers hal-00413730, HAL, 2008

  7. J. Staum, State of the art tutorial II: simulations for financial engineering: efficient simulations for option pricing, in Winter Simulation Conference (2003), pp. 258–266

  8. P. Glasserman, J. Li, New simulation methodology for risk analysis: importance sampling for a mixed Poisson model of portfolio credit risk, in Winter Simulation Conference, edited by S.E. Chick, P.J. Sanchez, D.M. Ferrin, D.J. Morrice (ACM, 2003), pp. 267–275

  9. P. Glasserman, J. Li, Manage. Sci. 51, 1643 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Capriotti, Quant. Financ. 8, 485 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Markit credit and loan indices, Markit Group Limited

  12. D.X. Li, Journal of Fixed Income 9, 43 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Salmon, Recipe for Disaster: The Formula That Killed Wall Street (2009), http://www.wired.com/wired/issue/17-03

  14. K. Giesecke, L.R. Goldberg, X. Ding, Oper. Res. 59, 283 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. X. Burtschell, J. Gregory, J.P. Laurent, Journal of Credit Risk 3, 31 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. X. Burtschell, J. Gregory, J.P. Laurent, Journal of Derivatives 16, 9 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F.A. Longstaff, A. Rajan, J. Finance 63, 529 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Brigo, A. Pallavicini, R. Torresetti, Risk magazine (2007), http://www.risk.net/risk-magazine/technical-paper/1500334/calibration-cdo-tranches-dynamical-gpl-model

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to É. Rácz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stippinger, M., Rácz, É., Vető, B. et al. Analytic results and weighted Monte Carlo simulations for CDO pricing. Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 51 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20429-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20429-x

Keywords

Navigation