Abstract
We use agent-based modeling to investigate the effect of conservatism and partisanship on the efficiency with which large populations solve the density classification task – a paradigmatic problem for information aggregation and consensus building. We find that conservative agents enhance the populations’ ability to efficiently solve the density classification task despite large levels of noise in the system. In contrast, we find that the presence of even a small fraction of partisans holding the minority position will result in deadlock or a consensus on an incorrect answer. Our results provide a possible explanation for the emergence of conservatism and suggest that even low levels of partisanship can lead to significant social costs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, the ABC Research Group, Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (Oxford University Press, 1999)
G. Gingerenzer, Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World (Evolution and Cognition Series) (Oxford University Press, 2000)
R. Goldman, R.P. Gabriel, M. Kaufmann, Innovation Happens Elsewhere: Open Source as Business Strategy (Elsevier, 2005)
R.N. Giere, J. Bickle, R. Mauldin, Understanding Scientific Reasoning (Wadsworth Publishing, 2005)
E.L. Lesser, J. Storck, IBM Syst. J. 40, 831 (2001)
H.W. Chesbrough, Harv. Bus. Rev. 81, 12 (2003)
S. Page, L. Hong, J. Econ. Theory 97, 123 (2001)
J. March, Organization Sci. 2, 71 (1991)
R. Guimerà, B. Uzzi, J. Spiro, L.A.N. Amaral, Science 308, 697 (2005)
C. Castellano, D. Vilone, A. Vespignani, Europhys. Lett. 63, 153 (2003)
A.A. Moreira, A. Mathur, D. Diermeier, L.A.N. Amaral, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12083 (2004)
V. Sood, S. Redner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 178701 (2005)
B. Uzzi, J. Spiro, Am. J. Sociol. 111, 447 (2005)
K. Suchecki, V.M. Eguíluz, M.S. Miguel, Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 72, 036132 (2005)
J.P. Crutchfield, M. Mitchell, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 10742 (1995)
C. Tessone, R. Toral, e-print arXiv:0808.0522
M. Girvan, M.E.J. Newman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7821 (2002)
R. Guimerà, L. Danon, A. Díaz-Guilera, F. Giralt, A. Arenas, Phys. Rev. E 68, 065103 (2003)
M.E.J. Newman, M. Girvan, Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004)
D.J. Watts, S.H. Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998)
D.J. Watts, Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness (Princeton University Press, 1999)
R. Hastie, T. Kameda, Psychological Rev. 112, 494 (2005)
M. Mobilia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 028701 (2003)
M. Mobilia, A. Petersen, S. Redner, J. Stat. Mech. P08029 (2007)
D. Westen, C. Kilts, P. Blagov, K. Harenski, S. Hammann, J. Cognitive Neuroscience. 18, 1947 (2006)
R. Axelrod, Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 80, 1095 (1986)
R. Axelrod, The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1997)
M. Cullen, P. Hodgson, Implementing the Carbon Tax – A Government Consultation Paper (2005)
J. Greenstock, The Cost of War (PublicAffairs, 2005)
M. White, The Fruits of War: How Military Conflict Accelerates Technology (Gardners Books, 2005)
J.P. Newhouse, Pricing the Priceless: A Health Care Conundrum (MIT Press, 2004)
S.D. Levitt, S.J. Dubner, Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything (W. Morrow, 2005)
A.W. Bock, Waiting to Inhale: The Politics of Medical Marijuana (Seven Locks Press, 2001)
M. Szalavitz, New Scientist 2509, 37 (2005)
C. Holden, Science 308, 1388 (2005)
S. Herrera, Nat. Biotech. 23, 775 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Micro-bias and macro-evolution.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seaver, S., Moreira, A., Sales-Pardo, M. et al. Micro-bias and macro-performance. Eur. Phys. J. B 67, 369–375 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2008-00406-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2008-00406-4