Skip to main content
Log in

The analysis of predictability of \( \alpha\) -decay half-life formulae and the \( \alpha\) partial half-lives of some exotic nuclei

  • Special Article - Tools for Experiment and Theory
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The predictabilities of the three \( \alpha\) -decay half-life formulae, the Royer GLDM, the Viola-Seaborg and the Sobiczewski-Parkhomenko formulae, have been evaluated by developing a method based on the ansatz of standard experimental benchmarking. The coefficients of each formula were re-derived using the reliable data of the \( \alpha\) -standards nuclei. The modified formulae that resulted were used to evaluate the accuracies of the formulae towards the prediction of half-lives of a set of nuclides with well-studied \( \alpha\) spectroscopic data as well as a set of exotic \( \alpha\) emitters. Further, a simple linear optimisation of the modified formulae allowed adjustments for the insufficient statistics of the primary data set without changing the modified formulae. While the three modified formulae showed equivalent results for all the medium heavy nuclei except the odd-odd, the modified GLDM showed relatively the best figures of merit for the odd-odd and superheavy nuclides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Oganessian, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34, R165 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S.N. Liddick et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 082501 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Sobiczewski, A. Parkhomenko, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 58, 292 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Armbruster, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 50, 411 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Schädel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 368 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Türler, Chemistry of superheavy elements, in the Fifth International Conference on Exotic Nuclei and Atomic Masses, ENAM08, Ryn, Poland, Sept. 9, 2008, unpublished.

  7. M.M. Sharma, A.R. Farhan, G. Münzenberg, Phys. Rev. C 71, 054310 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. D.N. Basu, J. Phys. G: Nucl Part. Phys. 30, B35 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P.R. Chowdhury, C. Samanta, D.N. Basu, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 94, 781 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Royer, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 26, 1149 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.C. Pei, F.R. Xu, Z.J. Lin, E.G. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C 76, 044326 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D.N. Poenaru, I.H. Plonski, W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 74, 014312 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Geiger, J.M. Nuttal, Philos. Mag. 22, 613 (1911).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Royer, R.A. Gherghescu, Nucl. Phys. A 699, 479 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. V.E. Viola jr., G.T. Seaborg, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28, 741 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Sobiczewski, Z. Patyk, S. Cwiok, Phys. Lett. B 224, 1 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Parkhomenko, A. Sobiczewski, Acta Phys. Pol. B 36, 3095 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Dong, Z. Ren, Eur. Phys. J. A 26, 69 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Oganessian, Heavy element research at FLNR (Dubna), in the Fifth International Conference on Exotic Nuclei and Atomic Masses, ENAM08, Ryn, Poland, Sept. 9, 2008, to be published in Eur. Phys. J. A.

  20. R.B. Firestone, V.S. Shirley, Table of Isotopes, 8th edition (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Dasgupta-Schubert, M.A. Reyes, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 93, 907 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. D.A. Skoog, J.J. Leary, Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 4th edition (Saunders College Publishing, Orlando, USA, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Royer, H.F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 77, 037602 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Gupta, T.W. Burrows, Nucl. Data Sheets 106, 251 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mathematica 5.2, Wolfram Research Inc., Champaign, Il 61820-7237, USA; W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, Ch. 15-5: Non-linear Models (Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 2007).

  26. J. Mandel, The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data (Dover Publications Inc., New York, USA, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  27. V.M. Strutinsky, Nucl. Phys. A 122, 1 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. B. Cheal et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 29, 2479 (2003); R.F. Casten, R.B. Cakirli, Acta Phys. Pol. B 40, 493 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. F.G. Kondev et al., Report: ANL/PHY/CP-101552, pp. 1–8, Nov. 2000.

  30. P.A. Butler, Acta Phys. Pol. B 29, 289 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. I. Muntian et al., J. Nucl. Radiochem. Sci. 3, 169 (2002); S.K. Patra et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 26, L65 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Dasgupta-Schubert.

Additional information

Communicated by N. Alamanos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dasgupta-Schubert, N., Reyes, M.A. & Tamez, V.A. The analysis of predictability of \( \alpha\) -decay half-life formulae and the \( \alpha\) partial half-lives of some exotic nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. A 42, 121 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2009-10859-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2009-10859-5

PACS

Navigation