Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predator–prey interaction between individuals: 1. The role of predators in natural selection

  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interactions in food chains are analyzed in terms of hunt success and selective elimination of prey by predators. This problem is important to understand the selective effect of predation. The examination of remains of the prey of wild predators does not reveal the reasons for elimination of particular individuals. A model of wild canids hunt was developed with the help of windhound dogs, which made it possible to analyze the procedure of pursuit and inspect the entire the prey but not only its parts. Was proved that the predator’s coursing speed is not the major factor in prey capture. The windhound’s hunt success was found to be 27% for saiga antelope and 12% for brown hare (of the number of pursuits). Hunt success in wild predators (large felids and canids) is usually less than 50% but sometimes may reach this value. The low efficiency of windhound hunt is the result of selection by chasing any prey without a preliminary estimation of pursuit perspectives, which is typical for wild predators. The use of windhounds for hunting wild animals revealed that only unhealthy animals were eliminated by the dogs: the saiga antelopes had some pathology of internal organs, and the brown hares caught by dogs were in a poorer condition than those killed by hunters. The abnormalities established in saiga antelopes could not be found when examining the remains of wild predator prey. The low hunt success is combined with a very high selectivity. Thus, the preliminary assessment of the accessibility of prey by predators is unreliable; however, the elimination of any deviations that decrease the adaptability of prey is effective. A predator is a universal breeder that removes adverse deviations from the populations of consumers of the first level, thereby preserving the adaptability of phenotypes and the population norm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiyy Uola-Aian, Specific features of wolf–ungulate relationships, in Okhrana i ratsional’noe ispol’zovanie zhivotnykh i rastitel’nykh resursov. Materialy konf. (Protection and Rational Management of Animal and Plant Resources: Proc. Conf.), Irkutsk, 2005a, pp. 184–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiyy Uola-Aian, Analysis of wold population size in Yakutia, in Okhrana i ratsional’noe ispol’zovanie zhivotnykh i rastitel’nykh resursov. Materialy konf. (Protection and Rational Management of Animal and Plant Resources: Proc. Conf.), Irkutsk, 2005b, pp. 176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altendorf, K.B., Laundre, J.W., Gonzalez, C.A.L., and Brown, J.S., Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer, J. Mammal., 2001, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 430–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matyushkin, E.N., Amurskii tigr v Rossii. Bibliograficheskii spravochnik 1925–1997 (The Amur Tiger in Russia: Bibliographic Guidebook, 1925–1997), Moscow, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, T.C., Gese, E.M., and Kunkel, K.E., Comparative patterns of predation by cougars and recolonising wolves in Montana’s Madison range, J. Wildl. Manag., 2007, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1098–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber-Meyer, S.M. and Mech, L.D., Factors influencing predation on juvenile ungulates and natural selection implications, Wildl. Biol. Pract., 2008, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 8–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber-Meyer, S.M., Mech, L.D., and White, P.J., Elk calf survival and mortality following wolf restoration to Yellowstone National Park, Wildl. Monogr., 2008, no. 169, pp. 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, L.M. and Novoselova, N.S., Predation risk as a factor affecting the length of foraging routes in the European beaver, Castor fiber, Zool. Zh., vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 226–230.

  • Begon, M., Harper, J.L., and Townsend, C.R., Ecology: Individuals, Populations, and Communities, Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. Translated under the title Ekologiya: Osobi, populyatsii i soobshchestva, Moscow: Mir, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, E.J., Garrott, R.A., Creel, S., Borkowski, J.J., Jaffe, R., and Watson, E.G.R., Assessment of prey vulnerability through analysis of wolf movements and kill sites, Ecol. Appl., 2006, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 273–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bologov, V.P., Wolf anf herd, Okhota Okhot. Khoz., 1981, no. 3, pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer, R.T., Kie, J.G., and Van Ballenberghe, V., Habitat selection by neonatal black-tailed deer: Climate, forage, or risk of predation?, J. Mammal., 1998, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 415–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, C., DuToit, J.T., and Gordon, I.J., Feeding success in African wild dogs: Does kleptoparasitism by spotted hyenas influence hunting group size?, J. Anim. Ecol., 1997, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 318–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernyavskii, F.B. and Tkachev, A.V., Populyatsionnye tsikly lemmingov v Arktike: ekologicheskie i endokrinnye aspekty (Lemming Population Cycles in the Arctic: Ecological and Endocrine Aspects), Moscow: Nauka, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, S. and Creel, N.M., Communal hunting and pack size in African wild dogs, Lycaon pictus, Anim. Behav., 1995, vol. 50, pp. 1325–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creel, S., Winnie, J., Maxwell, B., Hamlin, K., and Creel, M., Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves, Ecology, 2005, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 3387–3397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant, S.M., Competition, refuges, and coexistence: an example from Serengeti carnivores, J. Anim. Ecol., 1998, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 370–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filonov, K.P., Kopytnye zhivotnye i krupnye khishchniki na zapovednykh territoriyakh (Ungulates and Large Predators in Specially Protected Areas), Moscow: Nauka, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishhoff, I.R., Sunderesan, S.R., Cordingley, J., and Rubinstein, D.I., Habitat use and moments of plains zebra (Equus burchelli) in response to predation danger from lions, Behav. Ecol., 2007, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 725–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G.J. and Theberge, J.B., Response by wolves to prey variation in central Ontario, Can. J. Zool., 1996, vol. 74, no. 8, pp. 1511–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Formozov, A.N., Kolebaniya chislennosti promyslovykh zhivotnykh (Population Size Fluctuations in Commercial Game Animals), Moscow: Nauka, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzola, A., Bertelli, I., Avanzinelli, E., et al., Predation by wolves (Canis lupus) on wild and domestic ungulates of the Western Alps, Italy, J. Zool., 2005, vol. 266, no. 2, pp. 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R.D., Baer, A.M., Wotschikowsky, U., and Harestad, A.S., Kill rate by wolves on moose in the Yukon, Can. J. Zool., 2000, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M.W. and Kerley, G.I.H., Prey preferences of the lion (Panthera leo), J. Zool., 2005, vol. 267, pp. 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M.W., Henschel, P., O’Brien, J., Hofmeyr, M., Balme, G., and Kerley, G.I., Prey preferences of the leopard (Panthera pardus), J. Zool., 2006a, vol. 270, no. 2, pp. 298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M.W., Hofmeyr, M., O’Brien, J., and Kerley, G.I.H., Prey preferences of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) (Felidae: Carnivora): Morphological limitations or the need to capture rapidly consumable prey before kleptoparasites arrive, J. Zool., 2006b, vol. 270, no. 4, pp. 615–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, M.W., O’Brien, J., Hofmeyr, M., and Kerley, G.I.H., Prey preferences of the African wild dog Lycaon pictus (Canidae: Carnivora): ecological requirements for conservation, J. Mammal., 2006c, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1122–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, K.E. and Sinclair, A.R.E., Does predation risk cause snowshoe hares to modify their diets?, Can. J. Zool., 2003, vol. 81, no. 12, pp. 1973–1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, K.E., Boonstra, R., and Krebs, C.J., Overwinter mass loss of snowshoe hares in the Yukon: starvation, stress, adaptation, or artefact?, J. Anim. Ecol., 2006, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P.J., Dobson, A.P., and Newborn, D., Do parasites make prey vulnerable to predation: Red grouse and parasites, J. Anim. Ecol., 1992, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 681–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husseman, J.S., Murray, D.L., Power, G., Mack, C., Wenger, C.R., and Quigley, H., Assessing differential prey selection patterns between two sympatric large carnivores, Oikos, 2003, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 591–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanitskii, V.V., Vorob’i i rodstvennye im gruppy zernoyadnykh ptits: povedenie, ekologiya, evolyutsiya (Sparrows and Related Groups of Granivorous Birds: Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution), Moscow: KMK, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiris, I.E. and Nastis, A.S., Intensity of livestock grazing in relation to habitat use by brown hares (Lepus europaeus), J. Zool., 2007, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharkevich, E.A., Vasil’ev, V.G., and Shepel’, A.I., Experimental assessment of behavioral responses in different demographic groups of voles in an open-field test, in Biota gornykh territorii. Materialy konf. (The Biota of Mountain Regions: Proc. Conf.), 2002, pp. 261–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucheruk, V.V., Izbrannye trudy po prirodnoi ochagovosti boleznei (Selected Papers on Natural Focality of Diseases), Moscow: Rusaki, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D., The Natural Regulation of Animal Numbers, Oxford, 1954. Translated under the title Chislennost’ zhivotnykh i ee regulyatsiya v prirode, Moscow: Inostrannaya Literatura, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longland, W.S., Risk of predation and food consumption by black tailed jackrabbits, J. Range Manag., 1991, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 447–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matyushkin, E.N., The lynxes of the Holarctic, in Izbrannye trudy (Selected Works), Moscow: KMK, 2005, pp. 269–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech, L.D., The Wolf: The Behavior and Ecology of an Endangered Species, New York: Natural History Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezauida, E.T., Slater, S.J., and Benkman, C.W., Sage Grouse and indirect interactions: Potential implication of coyote control on Sage Grouse populations, Condor, 2006, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 747–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millan, J., Gortazar, C., Tizzani, P., and Buenestado, E., Do helminths increase the vulnerability of released pheasants to fox predation?, J. Helminthol., 2002, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 225–229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moller, A.P. and Erritzoe, J., Predation against birds with low immunocompetence, Oecologia, 2000, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 500–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskvin, N., The wolf in the Mologa–Sheksna interfluve, Okhota Okhot. Khoz., 1978, no. 2, pp. 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M.E. and Mech, L.D., A single deer stands-off three wolves, Am. Midl. Nat., 1993, no. 131, pp. 207–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E.P., Fundamentals of Ecology, Philadelphia: Saunders, 1971. Translated under the title Osnovy ekologii, Moscow: Mir, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, N. and Mills, M.G., Predator–prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web, J. Anim. Ecol., 2008, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 173–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, B.R. and Messier, F., Age and condition of deer killed by coyotes in Nova Scotia, Can. J. Zool., 2003, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1894–1898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov, D.S. and Kasumyan, A.O., Sensory bases of fish foraging behavior, Vopr. Ikhtiol., 1990, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 720–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R., Evolutionary Ecology, New York: Harper and Row, 1978. Translated under the title Evolyutsionnaya ekologiya, Moscow: Mir, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierco, B.M., Bowger, R.T., and Bleich, V.C., Habitat selection by mule deer: forage benefits or risk predation?, J. Wildl. Manag., 2004, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I., and Benard, M.F., Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator–prey interactions, Ecology, 2005, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 501–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punzalan, D., Rodd, F.H., and Hughes, K.A., Perceptual processes and the maintenance of polymorphism through frequency-dependent predation, Evol. Ecol., 2005, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quenette, P.Y., Functions of vigilance behavior in mammals: a review, Acta Oecol.–Int. J. Ecol., 1990, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 801–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, F.G.T. and Du Toit, S.T., Large predators and their prey in a southern African savanna: a predators size determines its prey size range, J. Anim. Ecol., 2004, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 410–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautian, A.S. and Sennikov, A.G., Predator–prey relationships on a phylogenetic time scale, in Ekosistemnye perestroiki v evolyutsii biosfery (Ecosystem Rearrangement in the Evolution of the Biosphere), vol. 4, Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2001.

  • Reale, D. and Festa-Bianchet, M., Predator-induced natural selection on temperament in bighorn ewes, Anim. Behav., 2003, vol. 65, pp. 463–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, N., McDonald, R.A., and Montgomery, W.I., Factors associated with hare mortality during coursing, Anim. Welfare, 2007, vol. 16, pp. 427–434.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, N., Magee, C., and Montgomery, W.I., Integrating field sports, hare population management and conservation, Acta Theriol., 2010, vol. 55, pp. 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs, R.E., The Economy of Nature, Portland, OR: Chiron, 1976. Translated under the title Osnovy obshchei ekologii, Moscow: Mir, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sand, H., Wikenros, C., Wabakken, P., and Liberg, O., Effects of hunting group size, snow depth, and age on the success of wolves hunting moose, Anim. Behav., 2006, vol. 72, pp. 781–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhausen, I.I., Stabilizing selection and its place among factors of evolution: 1. Stabilization of forms and the mechanism of stabilizing selection. 2. Significance of stabilizing selection in the course of evolution, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1941, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 307–330, 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepel’, A.I., Birds of prey in ecosystems of the forest zone, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Yekaterinburg, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilov, I.A., Ekologo-fiziologicheskie osnovy populyatsionnykh otnoshenii u zhivotnykh (Ecophysiological Bases of Population Relationships in Animals), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubkina, A.V., Severtsov, A.S., and Chayanov, N.V., Possibilities of using a GPS-based hardware–software complex to characterize animal movements and behavior in the steppe and forest–steppe zones, Zool. Zh., 2008, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubkina, A.V., Severtsov, A.S., and Chepeleva, K.V., Study of the hunting behavior of windhounds by means of GPS tracking: Quantitative characteristics of prey search and coursing, Zool. Zh., 2010, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 238–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubkina, A.V., Severtsov, A.S., and Chepeleva, K.V., Factors influencing the hunting success of the predator: a model with sighthounds, Biol. Bull., 2012, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A.R.E. and Arcese, P., Population consequences of predation-sensitive foraging: the Serengeti wildebeest, Ecology, 1995, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 882–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobodkin, L.B., Growth and Regulation of Animal Populations, New York, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, V.E., Severtsov, A.S., and Shubkina, A.V., Modeling the selective impact of predator on prey: using borzoi hounds to catch the saiga, Zool. Zh., 1990, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, I., Lindstrom, E., and Dejonge, J., Diet and habitat selection on the pine marten in relation to competition with the red fox, Acta Theriol., 1990, vol. 35, no. 34, pp. 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundell, J., Dudek, K.D., Klemme, S., Kolvisto, E., and Ylonen, H., Variation in predation risk and vole feeding behaviour: A field test of the risk allocation hypothesis, Oecologia, 2004, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 157–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suvorov, A.P., the wolf on the Tungus Plareau: the problem of predation, in Okhrana i ratsional’noe ispol’zovanie zhivotnykh i rastitel’nykh resursov. Materialy konf. (Protection and Rational Management of Planr and AnimalResources: Proc. Conf.), Irkutsk, 2005, pp. 303–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svirezhev, Yu.M. and Logofet, D.O., Ustoichivost’ biologicheskikh soobshchestv (Stability of Biological Communities), Moscow: Nauka, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H., The Strategy of the Genes: A Discussion of Some Aspects of Theoretical Biology, London: Allen & Unwin, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A.M., Lowe, J.C., Roskilly, K., Hudson, P.E., Golabek, K.A., and McNutt, J.W., Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs, Nature, 2013, vol. 498, pp. 185–189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winnie, J. and Creel, S., Sex-specific behavioural responses of elk to spatial and temporal variation in the threat of wolf predation, Anim. Behav., 2007, vol. 73, pp. 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirsing, A.J., Steury, T.D., and Murray, D.L., Relationship between body condition and vulnerability to predation in red squirrels and snowshoe hares, J. Mammal., 2002, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 707–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylonen, H., Vole cycles and antipredatory behavior, Trends Ecol. Evol., 1994, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 426–430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ylonen, H., Eccard, J.A., Jokinen, I., and Sundell, J., Is the antipredatory response in behaviour reflected in stress measured in faecal corticosteroids in a small rodent?, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 2006, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 350–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yudakov, A.G. and Nikolaev, I.G., Zimnyaya ekologiya amurskogo tigra (Winter Ecology of the Amur Tiger), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia

    A. S. Severtsov

  2. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow, 117071, Russia

    A. V. Shubkina

Authors
  1. A. S. Severtsov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. V. Shubkina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Severtsov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.S. Severtsov, A.V. Shubkina, 2014, published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 2014, Vol. 93, No. 6, pp. 768–777.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Severtsov, A.S., Shubkina, A.V. Predator–prey interaction between individuals: 1. The role of predators in natural selection. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 42, 633–642 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359015070080

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359015070080

Keywords

Search

Navigation