Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of the composition of concentrate solutions on the efficiency of carbon dioxide removal from monoethanolamine aqueous solution by electrodialysis

Petroleum Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The feasibility of optimizing the electromembrane removal of carbon dioxide from an aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) solution with a CO2/MEA molar ratio of 0.2 after the regeneration stage aimed to reduce the loss of MEA with the concentrate has been explored. The influence of the composition of the concentrate solution on the recovery of carbon dioxide and the specific loss of MEA (g MEA/g CO2 recovered) for a process duration of 1 h has been studied. The solution in the concentration cells was either distilled water or aqueous MEA solutions with a different carbon dioxide loadings. It has been found that the CO2 recovery ranges within 56.6–66.5%; the maximum and minimum specific losses of MEA make 4.80 and 1.49 g MEA/g CO2 recovered; and the specific energy consumption is 6.48–9.72 MJ/kg CO2 recovered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. N. V. Yazvikova and L. G. Zelenskaya, Zh. Prikl. Khim. (St. Petersburg) 48, 674 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Davis and G. Rochelle, Energy Procedia 1, 327 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. S. Islam, R. Yusoff, and B. S. Ali, Eng. e-Trans. 5(2), (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Dumee, C. Scholes, G. Stevens, and S. Kentish, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 10, 443 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. V. I. Zabolotskii, N. P. Gnusin, V. F. Pis’menskii, et al., Zh. Prikl. Khim. (St. Petersburg), 55, 1105 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. V. P. Vasilevskii, E. G. Novitskii, and V. V. Volkov, Krit. Tekhnol.: Membr. 48(4), 26 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Gregory, Jr. and M. F. Cohen, EPA Patent No. 0286143 (1993).

  8. H. Strathmann, Desalination 264, 268 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. B. Handagama, B. Baburao, F. Vitse, et al., US Patent No. 2012/0235087 (2012).

  10. V. P. Vasilevskii, V. V. Volkov, and E. G. Novitskii, Krit. Tekhnol.: Membr. 44(4), 14 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. V. Grigorchuk, V. I. Vasil’eva, V. A. Shaposhnik, and V. A. Kuz’minykh, Russ. J. Electrochem. 39, 777 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. I. Volkov and I. M. Zharskii, Big Handbook of Chemistry (Sovremennaya Shkola, Minsk, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. P. M. Blauwhoff, G. F. Versteeg, and W. P. M. van Swaaij, Chem. Eng. Sci. 39, 207 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. G. F. Versteeg, and W. P. M. van Swaaij, Chem. Eng. Sci. 43, 573 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C.-H. Liao and M.-H. Li., Chem. Eng. Sci. 57, 4569 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. G. Novitsky.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.G. Novitsky, V.P. Vasilevsky, S.D. Bazhenov, E.A. Grushevenko, V.I. Vasilyeva, A.V. Volkov, 2014, published in Membrany i Membrannye Tekhnologii, 2014, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 280–286.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novitsky, E.G., Vasilevsky, V.P., Bazhenov, S.D. et al. Influence of the composition of concentrate solutions on the efficiency of carbon dioxide removal from monoethanolamine aqueous solution by electrodialysis. Pet. Chem. 54, 680–685 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544114080118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0965544114080118

Keywords

Navigation