Skip to main content
Log in

Psychophysiological analysis of text reading and understanding

  • Published:
Human Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The individual characteristics of macrosaccades during the reading of fairy tales were measured, and the ability of subjects (students of liberal arts colleges) to demonstrate the understanding of the text (moral of tales) by writing a short summary was assessed. The abstracts were estimated by independent experts using a six-point scale. The preparation of the summary was not limited in time. Any relationship between the reading speed and the quality of text interpretation was not found. No relationship between the under-standing of the hidden moral and the number of characters captured in one fixation and the mean duration of macrosaccade was found either. Correlation analysis showed an inverse relationship between the number of returns and the understanding of the text: the grater the number of return macrosaccades, the worse the understanding of the text. An inverse relationship between the number of captured characters and the number of macrosaccades was found. The reading time of the text is directly correlated with the number of fixations. This means that the bandwidth of the visual communication channel per unit time is determined by the number of captured characters. The smaller the number of characters captured during fixation, the greater the reading time and the smaller the bandwidth of the eye per unit time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lebedeva, I.S., Creative and practical importance of tasks in teaching reading to students of technical colleges, in Vysshee gumanitarnoe obrazovanie XXI veka: Problemy i perspektivy: Matly pyatoi mezhdun. nauch.-prakt. konf (Higher Liberal Arts Education in XXI Century: Problems and Prospects, Proc. Fifth Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf.), Samara: PGSGA, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Radina, N.K., Istorii i skazki v psikhologicheskoi praktike (Stories and Fairy Tales in Psychological Practice), St. Petersburg, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Just, M.A. and Carpenter, R.A., A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension, Psychol. Rev., 1980, vol. 87, p. 329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Filin, V.A., Avtomatiya sakkad (Automaticity of Saccades), Moscow: Izd. MGU, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vakhrameeva, O.A., Sukhinin, M.V., Moiseenko, G.A., Murav’eva, S.V., Pronin, S.V., Volkov, V.V., and Shelepin, Yu.E., The study of perception thresholds depending on the geometry of the fovea, Sensor. Sistemy, 2013, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yarbus, A.L., Rol’ dvizhenii glaz v protsesse zreniya (The Role of Eye Movements in Vision), Moscow: Nauka, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rayner, K., Movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research, Psychol. Bull., 1998, vol. 124, no. 3, p. 372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishida, T. and Ikeda, M., Temporal properties of information extraction in reading studied by a text-mask replacement technique, J. Opt. Soc. A: Optics lmage Sci., 1989, vol. 6, p. 1624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rayner, K., Eye movements, perceptual span, and reading disability, Ann. Dyslexia, 1983, vol. 33, p. 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Slowiaczek, M.L. and Rayner, K., Sequential masking during eye fixations in reading, Bull. Psychonom. Soc., 1987, vol. 25, p. 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rayner, K., Visual Selection in Reading, Picture Perception, and Visual Search: A Tutorial Review. Attention and Performance, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1984, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huey, E.B., The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading, Cambridge, MA: MIT, (Originally published 1908) 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor, E.A., Controlled Reading: A Correlation of Diagnostic, Teaching and Corrective Techniques, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kempbell, F.V. and Shelepin, Yu.E., Foveola capabilities in distinguishing objects, Sensor. Sistemy, 1990, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Magnusson, E. and Naucler, K., Reading and spelling in language disordered children—linguistic and meta-linguistic prerequisites: report on a longitudinal study, Clin. Linguist. Phonet., 1990, vol. 4, p. 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bouma, H., Visual Search and Reading: Eye Movements and Functional Visual Field: A Tutorial Review. Attention and Performance, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Currie, C., McConkie, G.W., Carlson-Radvansky, L.A., and Irwin, D.E., The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world, Percept. Psychophys., 2000, vol. 62, p. 673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barabanshchikov, V.A., Dinamika zritel’nogo vospriyatiya (Visual Perception Dynamics), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rayner, K and Sereno, S.S., Eye movements in reading: psycholinguistic studies, in Handbook of Psycholinguistics, New York: Academic Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gippenreiter, Yu.B., Dvizheniya chelovecheskogo glaza (Human Eye Movements), Moscow: Izd. MGU, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carpenter, P.A. and Just, M.A., What your eyes do while your mind is reading, in EYe Movements in Reading: Perceptual and Language Processes, New York: Academic Press, 1983, p. 275.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Rayner, K. and Duffy, S.A., On-line comprehension processes and eye movements in reading, in Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, New York: Academic Press, 1988, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rayner, K. and McConkie, G.W., What guides a reader’s eye movements, Vision Res., 1976, vol. 16, p. 829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abrams, S.G. and Zuber, B.L., Some temporal characteristics of information processing during reading, Reading Res. Quarterl., 1972, vol. 12, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rayner, K., Parafoveal identification during a fixation in reading, Acta Psychologica, 1975, vol. 39, p. 272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Golikov, Yu.Ya. and Kostin, A.N., Theory and methods of problematicity analysis in a complex operator activity, in Problemnost’ v professional’noi deyatel’nosti: teoriya i metody psikhologicheskogo analiza (Problematicity in Professional Activity: Theory and Methods of Psychological Analysis), Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Lamminpiya.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.M. Lamminpiya, O.V. Zaschirinskaia, Yu.E. Shelepin, 2015, published in Fiziologiya Cheloveka, 2015, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 23–28.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lamminpiya, A.M., Zaschirinskaia, O.V. & Shelepin, Y.E. Psychophysiological analysis of text reading and understanding. Hum Physiol 41, 130–134 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119715020097

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119715020097

Keywords

Navigation