Skip to main content
Log in

The structural evolution of dunite and chromite ore from the Kharcheruz Massif, the Polar Urals

  • Published:
Geotectonics Aims and scope

Abstract

The Kharcheruz block of the Syumkeu ultramafic massif is a southern fragment of the Khadata ophiolitic belt, which closes the ophiolites of the Polar Urals in the north. The block, striking in the latitudinal direction, is sheetlike in shape and primarily composed of dunite with nearly latitudinal zones of chromite mineralization. The dunites are subject to ductile deformation various in intensity, and this variability is displayed in their heterogeneous structure and texture. The following microstructural types are distinguished by the variety and intensity of their deformation: protogranular → mesogranular → porphyroclastic → porphyrolath → mosaic. The petrostructural patterns of olivines pertaining to the above types reflect conditions of ductile deformation. Protogranular dunite is formed as a product of pyroxene decomposition in mantle harzburgite accompanied by annealing recrystallization at a temperature above 1000°C. Mesogranular dunite is formed as a product of high-temperature plastic flow by means of translation sliding in olivine and diffuse creep at a temperature dropping from 1000 to 650°C and at a low rate (<10–6 s–1). Cr-spinel segregates into linear zones of disseminated chromite mineralization within zones of bedding-plane plastic flow. Porphyroclastic and mosaic dunites are formed under conditions of intense deformation at a temperature of 500–750°C and at a significant rate (>10–6 s–1). Dunite is deformed by means of syntectonic recrystallization and subordinate translation gliding. Linear zones of disseminated mineralization undergo destruction thereby, with the formation of lenticular chromitite bodies from which ductile olivine is squeezed out with the formation of densely impregnated and massive ores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. V. Velinskii and N. S. Vartanova, “Regularities of the Tuvan hyperbasites chemistry,” in Petrologiya giperbazitov i bazitov Sibiri, Dal’nego Vostoka i Mongolii (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1980), pp. 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. I. Goncharenko, Petrotextural Evolution of Alpine Type Hyperbasites (Tomsk. Gos. Univ., Tomsk, 1989) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. I. Goncharenko and A. I. Chernyshov, Deformational Texture and Petrology of Nephrite-Bearing Hyperbasites (Tomsk. Gos. Univ., Tomsk, 1990) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. N. Kazakov, Dynamical Analysis of Microtextural Orientations of Minerals (Nauka, Leningrad, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. B. Makeev, B. V. Perevozchikov, and A. K. Afanas’ev, Chromite Potential of the Polar Urals (Komi Fil. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Syktyvkar, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Nicholas, Principles of Rock Deformation (Springer, Berlin, 1987).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. N. V. Pavlov, Chemical Composition of Chromespinelides with Respect to Petrographic Composition of Rocks in Ultrabasic Intrusive Massifs, Vol. 13 of Tr. Inst. Geol. Nauk Akad. Nauk SSSR. Ser. Rudn. Mestorozhdeniya (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1949) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petrology and Metamorphism of ancient Ophiolites: Case Study of the Polar Urals and West Sayan, Ed. by N. L. Dobretsov, Yu. E. Moldavantsev, A. P. Kazak, et al. (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1977) [in Russian].

  9. D. E. Savel’ev and V. B. Fedoseev, “Segregational mechanism of chromite bodies formation in ultrabasites of fold belts,” Rudy Met., No. 5, 35–42 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. E. Savel’ev, V. I. Snachev, E. N. Savel’eva, and E. A. Bazhin, Geology, Petrogeochemistry, and Chromite-Bearing Potential of Gabbro-Hyperbasite Massifs of the South Urals (DizainPoligrafServis, Ufa, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. N. Savelieva, Gabbro–Ultrabasite Complexes of the Urals and Their Analogs in the Modern Oceanic Crust (Nauka, Moscow, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. N. Savelieva, A. V. Sobolev, V. G. Batanova, P. V. Suslov, G. E. Brügmann, “Structure of melt flow channels in the mantle,” Geotectonics 42, 430–447 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. N. Savelyeva and P. V. Suslov, “Structure and composition of mantle peridotites at the boundary with crustal complexes of ophiolites in the Syumkeu massif, Polar Urals,” Geotectonics 48, 347–358 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G. M. Saranchina and V. N. Kozhevnikov, Fedorov’s Method of Mineral Identification and Microtextural Analysis (Nedra, Leningrad, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. I. Chernyshov, Ultramafites: Plastic Flow, Structural and Petrostructural Inhomogeneity (Charodei, Tomsk, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. I. Chernyshov, “Petrostructural signature of olivines in ultramafic rocks of the Paramsky and Shamansky massifs (Baikal–Muya ophiolite belt),” Russ. Geol. Geophys. 46, 1103–1114 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. I. Chernyshov and A. N. Yurichev, “Petrostructural evolution of ultramafic rocks of the Kalninsky chromite-bearing massif, Western Sayan,” Geotectonics 47, 266–278 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. V. R. Shmelev, Hyperbasites from the Syum-Keu Massif, Polar Urals: Structure, Petrology, and Dynamic Metamorphism (Ural. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Yekaterinburg, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. R. Shmelev, “Mantle ultrabasites of ophiolite complexes in the Polar Urals: Petrogenesis and geodynamic environments,” Petrology 19, 618–640 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S.-I. Karato, The Dynamic Structure of the Deep Earth (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. R. Kunze and N. G. Avé Lallemant, “Non-coaxial experimental deformation of olivine,” Tectonophysics 74 (3–4), T1–T13 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. C. Mercier, “Olivine and pyroxenes,” in Preferred Orientation in Deformed Metals and Rocks: An Introduction to Modern Texture Analysis, Ed. by H. R. Wenk (Academic Press, New York, 1985), pp. 407–430.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Nicolas and J. P. Poirier, Crystalline Plasticity and Solid State Flow in Metamorphic Rocks (Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Chernyshov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.I. Chernyshov, A.N. Yurichev, 2016, published in Geotektonika, 2016, No. 2, pp. 62–77.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chernyshov, A.I., Yurichev, A.N. The structural evolution of dunite and chromite ore from the Kharcheruz Massif, the Polar Urals. Geotecton. 50, 196–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852116020035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852116020035

Keywords

Navigation