Skip to main content
Log in

Two-stage network games

  • Mathematical Game Theory and Applications
  • Published:
Automation and Remote Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the paper, two-stage network games are studied. At the first stage of the game, the players form a network, while at the second stage they choose strategies according to the network realized at the first stage. Both noncooperative and cooperative settings are considered. In the noncooperative case, the Nash equilibrium is used as a solution concept, whereas the cooperative setting involves an allocation (the Shapley value) as a solution concept. It is demonstrated that the Shapley value does not satisfy the time consistency property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pozitsionnye igry (Positional Games), Vorob’ev, V.V. and Vrublevskaya, I.N., Eds., Moscow: Nauka, 1967.

  2. Petrosyan, L.A., Stable Solutions in Differential Games with Several Players, Vestn. Leningrad. Gos. Univ., 1977, no. 19, pp. 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Petrosyan, L.A. and Danilov, N.N., Stable Solutions in Nonantagonistic Differential Games with Transferable Payoffs, Vestn. Leningrad. Gos. Univ., 1979, no. 1, pp. 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petrosyan, L.A., Zenkevich, N.A., and Shevkoplyas, E.V., Teoriya igr (Game Theory), St. Petersburg: BKhV-Peterburg, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrosyan, L.A. and Sedakov, A.A., Multistage Network Games with Perfect Information, Mat. Teor. Igr Prilozh., 2009, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 66–81.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bala, V. and Goyal, S., A Non-CooperativeModel of Network Formation, Econometrica, 2000, vol. 68(5), pp. 1181–1231.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dutta, B., van den Nouweland, A., and Tijs, S., Link Formation in Cooperative Situations, Int. J. Game Theory, 1998, vol. 27, pp. 245–256.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Goyal, S. and Vega-Redondo, F., Network Formation and Social Coordination, Games Econom. Behav., 2005, vol. 50, pp. 178–207.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson, M. and Watts, A., On the Formation of Interaction Networks in Social Coordination Games, Games Econom. Behav., 2002, vol. 41(2), pp. 265–291.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, M.O. and Wolinsky, A., A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks, J. Econom. Theory, 1996, vol. 71, pp. 44–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapley, L.S., A Value for N-Person Games, in Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Kuhn, W. and Tucker, A.W., Eds., Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1953, pp. 307–317.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. A. Petrosyan.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © L.A. Petrosyan, A.A. Sedakov, A.O. Bochkarev, 2013, published in Matematicheskaya Teoriya Igr i Ee Prilozheniya, 2013, No. 4, pp. 84–104.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petrosyan, L.A., Sedakov, A.A. & Bochkarev, A.O. Two-stage network games. Autom Remote Control 77, 1855–1866 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000511791610012X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000511791610012X

Navigation