Abstract
The migration of mercury vapor through various types of organomineral filters is considered, and the absorption capacity of the geochemical barriers formed is determined. The most promising types of geochemical barriers for subsurface disposal in the forest-steppe zone are revealed. It is proposed to reduce the vaporization of mercury by transforming it to a more conservative phase—the metacinnabarite modification of mercuric sulfide (HgS).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. A. Yagol’nitser, V.M. Sokolov, A. D. Ryabtsev, et al., “Evaluation of Industrial Mercury Emissions in Siberia,” Khimiya v Interesakh Ustoichivogo Razvitiya 3(1–2), 23 (1995).
A. A. Saukov, N. H. Aidin’yan, and N. A. Ozerova, Essays on Mercury Geochemistry (Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].
V. Z. Fursov, Gas-Mercury Method of Searching for Mineral Deposits (Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].
A. I. Bych and A. I. Batyrev, “Manganese Deposits of Kemerovo Oblast,” Rudy i Metally, No. 2, 22 (1998).
V. P. Panfilov (Ed.), Agrophysical Characteristics of Soils in West Siberia (Novosibirsk, 1976) [in Russian].
B. V. Nekrasov, Fundamentals of General Chemistry (Moscow, 1973), Vol. 2 [in Russian].
V. Z. Fursov, Identification and Assessment of Overlaid Geochemical Anomalies of Mercury in Closed Areas During Multipurpose Geochemical Mapping-200, Methodical Guidelines (Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].
Yu. V. Alekhin, N. B. Koval’skaya, S. A. Lapitskii, and Z. I. Minubaeva, “New Results from Studies of Diffusion and Filtration Migration of Mobile Mercury Forms,” in Site “Everything about Geology” http://geo.web.ru/db/msg.html?mid=1169917.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.E. Boguslavskii, A.P. Krivenko, 2010, published in Sibirskii Ekologicheskii Zhurnal, 2010, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 843–850.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boguslavskii, A.E., Krivenko, A.P. On the use of geochemical barriers to prevent the migration of mercury vapor. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 3, 615–620 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425510060019
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425510060019