Abstract
The radical breaking of Russia’s socioeconomic basis has generated keen public interest in forecasts and recommendations of economic science. Quite often, and generally unjustifiably, responsibility for unreasoned decisions in the economic sphere is attributed to economists. Meanwhile, present-day economic science is going through a difficult time, which many economists characterize as a methodological crisis. This subject was discussed by V.S. Avtonomov at a session of the RAS Presidium last autumn.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. M. Polterovich, “A Crisis of Economic Theory,” Ekon. Nauka Sovrem. Rossii, No. 1 (1998).
O. Anan’in, “Economics: How Is It Done and What Are the Outcomes? (On the Book by M. Blaug The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain), Vopr. Ekon., No. 3 (2004).
J. M. Keynes, The Collected Works of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 14: The General Theory and After (Macmillan, London, 1973).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Original Russian Text © V.S. Avtonomov, 2006, published in Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk, 2006, Vol. 76, No. 3, pp. 203–208.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avtonomov, V.S. Methodological problems of modern economic science. Her. Russ. Acad. Sci. 76, 134–138 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331606020043
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331606020043