Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of three solar activity indices based on sunspot observations

  • Published:
Solar System Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The following sunspot formation indices are analyzed: the relative sunspot number R z, the normalized sunspot group number R g, and the total sunspot area A. Six empirical formulas are derived to describe the relations among these indices after 1908. The earlier data exhibit systematic deviations from these formulas, which can be attributed to systematic errors of the indices. The Greenwich data on the sunspot total area A and the sunspot group number in 1874–1880 are found to be doubtful. Erroneous data at the beginning of the Greenwich series must spoil the values of the index R g in the XVII–XIX centuries. The Hoyt-Schatten series of R g may be less reliable than the well-known Wolf number series R z.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chibisov, K.V., Modern Photographic Materials and Prospects for Their Further Improvement, Usp. Nauchn. Fotografii, 1951, vol. 1, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, D.H., Wilson, R.M., and Reichmann E.J., Group Sunspot Numbers: Sunspot Cycle Characteristics, Solar Phys., 2002, vol. 211, p. 357.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, D.V. and Schatten, K.H., Group Sunspot Numbers: A New Solar Activity Reconstruction, Solar Phys., 1998, vol. 181, p. 491.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuklin, G.V., Results of Analyses of the 11- and 22-Year Wolf-Number Cycles, Issledovaniya po geomagnetizmu, aeronomii i fizike Solntsa (Studies on Geomagnetism, Aeronomy, and Solar Physics), 1984, no. 68, p. 45.

  • Nagovitsyn, Yu.L., Sunspot Area Index Sequence in the Greenwich System in 1821–1989, Solnechnye dannye. Stat’i I soobshcheniya 1995–1996 (Solar Data. Papers and Reports of 1995–1996), 1997, p. 38.

  • Nagovitsyn, Yu.L., To the Description of Long-Term Variations in the Solar Magnetic Flux: The Sunspot Area Index, Pis’ma Astron. Zhurn. 2005, vol. 31, no. 8, p. 622 [Astron. Lett. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 31, no. 8, p. 557].

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagovitsyn, Yu.L., Solar Activity and Solar-Terrestrial Relations in View of Long-Term Space-Weather Trends: the Problem of “Space Climate,” Trudy XI Pulkovskoi mezhdunarodn. conf. po fizike Solntsa, July 2–7, 2007 (Proc. XI Pulkovo Intern. Conf. on Solar Phys., July 2–7, 2007), St.-Petersburg: Pulkovo, 2007, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogurtsov, M.G., Was the Solar Activity in the Last 100 Years Abnormally High? On the Quality of Modern Solar Paleoreconstructions, Pis’ma Astron. Zhurn. 2007, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 472 [Astron. Lett. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 33, no. 6, p. 419].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarychev, A.P. and Roshchina, E.M., Total Sunspot Area Before 1875 (Reconstruction), Astron. Vestn., 2007, vol. 41, no. 3, p. 278 [Solar System Res. (Engl. Transl.), vol. 41, no. 3, p. 256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usoskin, I.G. and Kovaltsov, G.A., Long-Term Solar Activity: Direct and Indirect Study, Solar Phys., 2004, vol. 224, p. 37.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Usoskin, I.G., Mursula, K., and Kovaltsov G.A., Reconstruction of Monthly and Yearly Group Sunspot Numbers from Sparse Daily Observations, Solar Phys., 2003, vol. 218, p. 295.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaquero, J.M., On the Solar Activity During the Year 1784, Solar Phys., 2004, vol. 219, p. 379.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaquero, J.M., Gallego, M.C., and Sänchez-Bajo, F., Reconstruction of a Monthly Homogeneous Sunspot Area Series Since 1832, Solar Phys., 2004, vol. 221, p. 179.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaquero, J.M., Gallego, M.C., and Trigo, R.M., Sunspot Numbers During 1736–1739 Revisited, Adv. Space Res., 2007, vol. 40, p. 1895.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaquero, J.M., Trigo, R.M., and Gallego, M.C., A “Lost” Sunspot Observation in 1785, Astron. Nachr., 2005, vol. 326, p. 112.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vitinskii, Yu.I., Kopeshchii, M., and Kuklin, G.V., Statistika pyatnoobrazovatel’noi deyatel’nosti Solntsa (Statistic of the Sunspot Activity), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Universitetskii pr. 13, Moscow, 119899, Russia

    A. P. Sarychev & E. M. Roshchina

Authors
  1. A. P. Sarychev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. M. Roshchina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.P. Sarychev, E.M. Roshchina, 2009, published in Astronomicheskii Vestnik, 2009, vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 160–166.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarychev, A.P., Roshchina, E.M. Comparison of three solar activity indices based on sunspot observations. Sol Syst Res 43, 151–157 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094609020087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0038094609020087

PACS

Search

Navigation