Abstract
Background, Aims and Scope
The actual land use consequences of crop consumption are not very well reflected in existing life cycle inventories. The state of the art is that such inventories typically include data from crop production in the country in which the crop is produced, and consequently the inventories do not necessarily consider the land ultimately affected in the systems being studied. The aims of this study are to analyse the mechanisms influencing the long-term land use consequences of changes in crop demand and to propose a methodological framework for identifying these consequences within a global scope.
Materials and Methods
The study refers to the principles of consequential LCA, which means that the consequences of changes in consumption are studied from a market-based perspective. In this context, the study addresses the feasibility of using economic modelling to identify ultimate land use consequences of crop consumption.
Results
Based on the current market trend for crops and an analysis of basic mechanisms in crop production, concepts for modelling how crop consumption affects the global agricultural area and the intensity of crop production are suggested. It is demonstrated how the assumptions concerning drivers for technological development have a profound influence on identification of the marginal response to crop consumption, and how the geographical location of crop consumption also influences the composition of the marginal production response in terms of cropland expansion and intensification.
Discussion
Crop prices have been falling at a global scale and are projected to decline further. At the same time, crop yields per hectare are continuously increasing. This indicates that drivers other than crop demand have a strong influence on technological development in crop production.
Conclusions
Economic modelling in combination with geographical information and agricultural statistics can be used to estimate long-term land use consequences of changes in crop consumption. The GTAP Model is a suitable tool although it requires implementation of land supply curves, adjustment of elasticities to reflect long-term changes, and possibly establishment of a link between crop demand and technological development. Through this approach, life cycle inventories for crops reflecting the actual land use consequences of consumption can be established.
Recommendations and Perspectives
Further work (based on the methodological framework in this study) will address the practical modelling of land use changes induced by crop consumption in different regions with the purpose of including this in LCI.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abler D (2003): Adjustment at the Sectoral Level. In: An IAPRAP Workshop on Policy Reform and Adjustment, The Wye Campus of Imperial College, October 23–25, http://agadjust.aers.psu.edu/Workshop_files/Abler_presentation.pdf
Andersen SB (2006): Written dialogue with Sven Bode Andersen, Professor of plant breeding. Faculty of Life Sciences, Denmark
Bruinsma J (ed) (2002): World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030: an FAO Perspective. Earthscan, London
Cochrane WW (1958): Farm Prices — Myth and Reality. University of Minnesota Press
Ekvall T, Weidema B (2004): System Boundaries and Input Data in Consequential Life Cycle Inventory Analysis. Int J LCA 9, 161–171
European Commission (2002): Implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
European Council (2001): Applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004. Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 346/1
FAOSTAT (2007): http://faostat.fao.org, United Nations Food and Agricultural Organisation
FAPRI (2006): U.S. and World Agricultural Outlook. Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Iowa, USA
Gabre-Madhin E, Barret CB, Dorosh P (2002): Technological Change and Price Effects in Agriculture: Conceptual and Comparative Perspectives. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, USA
Hertel TW (1997): Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge University Press
Jensen JD, Andersen M (2003): Marginale producenter af udvalgte landbrugsprodukter. Institute of Food Economics, Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, working paper no. 08/2003 (in Danish)
Klijn JA, Vullings LAE (2005): The EURURALIS Study: Technical Document, EURURALIS 1.0 — A Scenario Study on Europe’s Rural Areas to Support Policy Discussion. RIVM, Alterra-rapport 1196
Kløverpris J (2006): Inventory Analysis of Crop Production in LCA — A Pre-requisite for Impact Assessment of Crop Use. In: Milà i Canals L, Basson L, Clift R, Müller-Wenk R, Bauer C, Hansen Y, Brandão M (eds), Proceedings from Expert Workshop on Definition of Best Indicators for Biodiversity and Soil Quality for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Guildford, June 12–13. CES Working Paper 02/06, 50–53, available from www.surrey.ac.uk/CES
Kløverpris J, Baltzer K, Nielsen PH (in preparation): Life Cycle Inventory Modelling of Land Use Induced by Crop Consumption. Part II: Example of wheat consumption in Brazil, China, Denmark, and the USA (to be submitted to Int J LCA)
Lambin EF, Geist HJ (2003): Regional Differences in Tropical Deforestation. Environment 45, 22–36
Lindeijer E (2000): Review of land use impact methodologies. J Clean Prod 8, 273–281
Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Steen B (2002): Impact Assessment of Resources and Land Use. Chapter 2 in: Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving Towards Best Practice. Edited by Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich EG, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Olsen SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, and Steen B. SETAC, Pensacola
IFPRI (2002): Green Revolution — Curse or Blessing? International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC 20006-1002, USA
Mila i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Knuchel RF, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Müller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2007): Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment within LCA. Int J LCA 12, 5–15
Mila i Canals L, Clift R, Basson L, Hansen Y, Brandão M (2006): Expert Workshop on Land Use Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Int J LCA 11, 363–368
OECD/FAO (2005): OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2005–2014, OECD Publishing
OECD/FAO (2006): OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2006–2015, OECD Publishing
Ramankutty N, Graumlich L, Achard F, Alves D, Chhabra A, DeFries R, Foley J, Geist H, Houghton R, Goldewijk KK, Lambin E, Millington A, Rasmussen K, Reid R, Turner BL (2006): Chapter 2, Global Land Cover Change: Recent Progress, Remaining Challenges, in Land Use and Land Cover Change: Local Processes, Global Impacts, edited by E. Lambin and H. Geist, Springer Verlag, New York
van Meijl H, van Rheenen T, Tabeau A, Eickhout B (2006): The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 114, 21–38
Weidema BP (2003): Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Danish Ministry of Environment, Environmental Project No. 863
Weidema BP, Frees N, Nielsen AM (1999): Marginal Production Technologies for Life Cycle Inventories. Int J LCA 4, 48–56
Wenzel H (1998): Application Dependency of LCA Methodology: Key Variables and Their Mode of Influencing the Method. Int J LCA 3, 281–288
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ESS-Submission Editor: Dr. Llorenç Milà i Canals (L.MiC@surrey.ac.uk)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kløverpris, J., Wenzel, H. & Nielsen, P.H. Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13, 13–21 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.10.364
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2007.10.364