Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anarchy in the East: Eurocentrism, China-centred geopolitics and uneven and combined development

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mainstream international theories have not been successful in explaining patterns of non-Western international systems due to their deep-seated problem of Eurocentrism. Yet for many attempts at alternative theorization, antidotes to Eurocentrism are only conceivable from a position which denies the theoretical core of mainstream IR, namely the ‘logic of anarchy’. Take the China-centred international system for example: a cultural-reductionist argument currently suggests that premodern East Asia was more peaceful because it comprised a hierarchical, rather than an anarchical order, underpinned by the predominant Confucian culture. This article will first show that such alternative cultural-reductionist explanations are no more advanced than Eurocentric theories because they both tend towards uni-linear understanding of an historical evolution which in fact is multi-linear in nature. What is really problematic is not anarchy, but the lack of an interactive perspective in both mainstream and cultural-reductionist IR that enables a progressive understanding of the evolution of human political agency. The article will then propose that Leon Trotsky’s theory of uneven and combined development can resolve this problem, providing a theoretical re-appraisal of premodern East Asia. Central to the geopolitics of premodern East Asia, I will suggest, is not Confucianism, but the ‘internationally generated combination’ in China’s political agency: a transformation from a prototypical nation-state to a cosmopolitan empire against an enduring backdrop of agrarian society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.A. (2008) Treacherous factions: Shifting frontier alliances in the breakdown of Sino-Vietnamese relations on the eve of the 1075 Border War. In: D. Wyatt (ed.) Battlefronts Real and Imagined: War, Border, Identity in the Chinese Middle Period. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1974) Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1979) Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. (2009) Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, J. (2010) Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, R.K. (1993) Wealth, power and instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War. International Security 18(3): 34–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1978) Feudal Society: The Growth of Ties of Dependence, Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kagan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bodde, D. (1986) The State and Empire of Chin. In: The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 1. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

  • Buzan, B. (1995) The level of analysis problem in international relations reconsidered. In: K. Booth and S. Smith (ed.) International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 198–216.

  • Buzan, B. (2010) Culture and International Society. International Affairs 86(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. and Waever, O. (2003) Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe, Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, N. (1993) The Lifanyuan and the inner Asian rituals in the early Qing (1644–1795). Late Imperial China 14(1): 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2009) How hierarchical can international society be?. International Relations 23(3): 464–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. (2001) Posing problems without catching up: China’s rise and challenge for US security policy. International Security 25(4): 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bary, W.T. (1991) The Problems with Confucianism. Cambridge: University of Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Cosmo, N. (2004) Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Donnelly, J. (2006) Sovereign inequalities and hierarchy in anarchy: American power and international society. European Journal of International Relations 12(2): 139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenhard, W. (1965) Conquerors and Rulers: Social Forces in Medieval China. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, M.C. (2001) The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvin, M. (1973) The Pattern of the Chinese Past. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Fairbank, J.K. (ed.) (1968) The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbank, J.K, Reischauer, E.O. and Craig, A.M. (1973) East Asia: Tradition and Transformation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Gellner, E. (1983) Nations and Nationalism. New York: Wiley.

  • Goldstein, A. (1997) Great Expectations: Interpreting China’s Arrival. International Security 22(3): 36–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell, R. (1962) A revolution in the iron and coal industries in the Northern Sung. Journal of Asian Studies 21(2): 153–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, V.T.B. (2005) War and State in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P.T. (1967) The Significance of the Ch’ing Period in Chinese History. The Journal of Asian Studies 26(2): 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1959) International Relations: The Long Road to Theory. World Politics 11(3): 346–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1985) From balance to concert: A study of international security cooperation. World Politics 38(1): 58–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, D. (2003) Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical framework. International Security 27(4): 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, D. (2010) East Asia Before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knei-Paz, B. (1978) The Social and Political Thought of Leon Trotsky. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. (2012) A ‘Confucian Long Peace’ in Pre-Western East Asia?. European Journal of International Relations 18(3): 407–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazanov, A. (1994) Nomads and the Outside World. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Kuhn, P.A. (1978) The Taiping Rebellion. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 10, Late Ching, 1800–1911, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kuhn, P.A. (1980) Rebellion and Its Enemies in Late Imperial China: Militarization and Social Structure 1796–1864. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D.A. (2009) Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapid, Y. and Kratochwil, F. (ed.) (1996) The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory. London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, O. (1951) Inner Asian Frontiers of China. New York: American Geographical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattimore, O. (1962) Nomads and Commissars: Mongolia Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, N.Y. and Huang, K.C. (2009) Founding and consolidation of the Sung Dynasty under Tai-tsu. In: The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layne, C. (1993) The unipolar illusion: Why new great powers will rise. International Security 17(4): 5–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layne, C. (2006) The unipolar illusion revisited: The coming end of the United States, unipolar moment. International Security 31(2): 7–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R.N. (2009) A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J.W and Moravcsik, A. (1999) Is anybody still a realist?. International Security 24(2): 5–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M.E. (2007) The Early Chinese Empires: Qin and Han. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J.W. (ed.) (1992) Riben Xuezhe Yanjiuzhongguo Shilunzhu Xuanyi (Selected Translation of Japanese Scholars’ Research on China), Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (1986) The Sources of Social Power Vol. 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Manning, R. and Przystup, J. (1999) Asia’s transition diplomacy: Hedging against futureshock. Survival 41(3): 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1973) Grundrisse. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matin, K. (2007) Uneven and combined development in world history: the international relations of state-formation in premodern Iran. European Journal of International Relations 13(3): 419–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matin, K. (2013) Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 353–377.

  • McCord, E.A. (1993) The Power of the Gun: The Emergence of Modern Chinese Warlordism. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (1995) Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War. International Security 15(1): 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, F. (1949) Military organization and power structure of China during the Taiping Rebellion. Pacific Historical Review 18(4): 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, F. (1965) The Origin of Manchu Rule in China: Frontier and Bureaucracy as Interacting Forces in the Chinese Empire. New York: Octagon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H. (1991) The assumption of anarchy in international relations theory: A critique. Review of International Studies 17(1): 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natsagdorj, S. (1967) The economic basis of feudalism in Mongolia. Modern Asian Studies 1(3): 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, P. (2005) China Marches The West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdue, P. (2009) Nature and nurture on imperial China’s frontiers. Modern Asian Studies 43(1): 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, K. (2000) The Great Divergence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reischauer, E.O. (1974) The Sinic world in perspective. Foreign Affairs 52(2): 341–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2006) Why is there no international historical sociology?. European Journal of International Relations 12(3): 307–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2007) International relations: The `Higher Bullshit’: A reply to the globalization theory debate. International Politics 44(4): 450–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2009) Basic problems in the theory of uneven and combined development: A reply to the CRIA Forum. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22(1): 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2010) Basic Problems in the theory of uneven and combined development II: Unevenness and political multiplicity. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23(1): 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2013a) The ‘Philosophical Premises’ of uneven and combined development. Review of International Studies 39(03): 569–597. First view article: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. (2013b) Kenneth Waltz and Leon Trotsky: Anarchy in the mirror of uneven and combined development. International Politics 50(2): 183–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. (2006) Balance of power politics and the rise of China: accommodation and balancing in East Asia. Security Studies 15(3): 355–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossabi, M. (1994) The Reign of Khubilai Khan. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 6, Alien Regimes and Border States, 907–1368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rowe, W.T. (2001) Saving the World: Chen Hongmou and Elite Consciousness in Eighteenth-Century China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W.T. (2009) China’s Last Empire: The Great Qing. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G. (1986) Continuity and transformation in the world polity: toward a neorealist synthesis. In: Keohane, R (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G. (1993) Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization 47(1): 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrecker, J.E. (2004) The Chinese Revolution in Historical Perspective. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.

  • Schroeder, P. (1994) Historical reality vs. neo-realist theory. International Security 19(1): 108–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P.J. (2009) Shen-Tsung’s Reign and the new policies of Wang An-shih. In: Cambridge History of China, Vol. 5, Part One: The Sung Dynasty and Its Precursors, 907–1279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Tenbruck, F. (1994) Internal history of society or universal history?. Theory, Culture & Society 11: 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B. (1998) Geopolitical relations in the European middle ages: History and theory. International Organization 52(2): 325–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B. (2002) Theorizing the Westphalian system of states: The international relations from absolutism to capitalism. European Journal of International Relations 8(1): 5–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B. (2003) The myth of 1648. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B. and Lacher, H. (2007) The Changing ‘Logics’ of capitalist competition. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20(4): 565–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotsky, L. (1964) The Age of Permanent Revolution: A Trotsky Anthology, edited by I. Deutscher. New York: Dell Publishing.

  • Trotsky, L. (1971) 1905. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotsky, L. (1972) The Revolution Betrayed. New York: Pathfinder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotsky, L. (1980) The History of Russian Revolution. New York: Pathfinder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W.M. (1996) Confucian Tradition in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-dragons. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitchett, D. (1962) Land Tenure and the Social Order in T’ang and Sung China. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, J.A. (1997) The realist paradigm and degenerative versus progressive research programs: An appraisal of neotraditional research on Waltz’s balancing proposition. The American Political Science Review 91(4): 899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeman, F. (1978) The Canton trade and the Opium War. The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 10, Late Ching, 1800–1911, Part 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Waltz, K. (1959) Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1993) The emerging structure of international politics. International Security 18 (2): 44–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (2000) Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security 25 (1): 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G.W. (1963) The Structure of Power in North China During the Five Dynasties. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1951) The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1987) The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization 41(3): 335–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy is what state make of it. International Organization 46(2): 391–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1997) Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review 88(2): 384–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. and Friedheim, D. (1995) Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State. International Organization 49(4): 689–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittfogel, K. (1957) Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, W. (2009) Unipolarity, status competition and great power war. World Politics 61(1): 28–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R.B. (1997) China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. (1998) Territorial order and collective identity tensions in Confucian Asia: China, Vietnam, Korea. Daedalus 127(3): 191–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F. (2014) How hierarchical was the historical East Asian system?. International Politics 51(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Justin Rosenberg, Kamran Matin, Darius A’zami and Jasper Green for their valuable input and continuous encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Relations, University of Sharjah, University City, 27272, UAE

    Xin Liu

Authors
  1. Xin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X. Anarchy in the East: Eurocentrism, China-centred geopolitics and uneven and combined development. Int Polit 53, 574–595 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-016-0007-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-016-0007-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation