Skip to main content
Log in

teaching political science with a mooc: analysing the supply side and the demand side

  • Teaching and Training
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Massive open online courses (MOOC) have been considered by some observers as a powerful opportunity to improve distant learning. The Université catholique de Louvain was the first Belgian university to deliver a political science MOOC (Louv3x) in French, entitled ‘Discovering political science’ (Découvrir la science politique). This paper seeks to explore the challenges a pedagogical team faces when transforming a ‘traditional’ political science introductory course into a MOOC. The paper also explores how the use of a MOOC might impact the learning outcome within on-campus and worldwide students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Source edX and authors 2014 and 2015, from a sample of 7568 (edition 1), 5661 (edition 2) and 4490 (edition 3) individuals.

Figure 2
Figure 3

Source edX and authors 2014 and 2015, from a sample of 7568 (edition 1), 5661 (edition 2) and 4490 (edition 3) individuals.

Figure 4

Source edX and authors 2014 and 2015, from a sample of 7568 (edition 1), 5661 (edition 2) and 4490 (edition 3) individuals.

Figure 5

Source Authors, 2014 and 2015 – Data expressed as a percentage, from a sample of 1428 individuals (pre-questionnaire) for the 1st edition; from a sample of 1583 individuals (pre-questionnaire) for the 2nd edition and from a sample of 946 individuals (pre-questionnaire) for the third edition; the total is not always equal to 100 because of rounded percentages.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamopoulos, P. (2013) What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses, Paper presented at the Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems, Milan, available at http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~padamopo/What%20makes%20a%20great%20MOOC.pdf, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • Anderson, T. (2013) Promise and/or peril: MOOCs and open and distance education, Athabasca University, available at http://www.ethicalforum.be/sites/default/files/MOOCsPromisePeril.pdf, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • Arbaugh, J.B. and Benbunan-Fich, R. (2006) ‘An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments’, The Academy of Management Learning and Education 5(4): 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanden, J., Buscha, F., Sturgis, P. and Urwin, P. (2012) ‘Measuring the earnings returns to lifelong learning in the UK’ Economics of Education Review 31(4): 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, Y. and Thornton, J. (2013) ‘Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC,’ http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/6216, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • Bonk, C.J. and Khoo, E. (2014) ‘Adding Some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ Activities for Motivating and Retaining Learners Online’, Bloomington, Indiana: Open World Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, D., Breakwell, N. and Bailey, J. (2014) ‘Keeping them clicking: Promoting student engagement in MOOC design’, The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 6(2): 1–15, available at http://icep.ie/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CassidyBreakwellBailey.pdf, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • Cheung, E. (2014) Analyzing Student Engagement and Retention in Georgetown’s First MOOC: Globalization’s Winners and Losers: Challenges for Developed and Developing Countries (Master thesis, Georgetown University, Washington, DC) available at: http://repository.library.georgetown.edu, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • Cormier, D. and Gillis, N. (2010) ‘What is a MOOC?’ [video], available at http://www.youtube.com, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • Dillenbourg, P., Fox, A., Kirchner, C., Mitchell, J. and Wirsing, M. (2014) ‘Massive open online courses: Current state and perspectives’, Dagstuhl Manifestos 4(1): 1–27, available at: http://ethicalforum2013.fuus.be/, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • edX. (2015) Media kit, available at http://www.edx.org, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • El-Hmoudova, D. (2014) ‘MOOCs motivation and communication in the cyber learning environment’, ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences 131: 29–34. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.074.

  • Fairhurst, A.M. and Fairhurst, L.L. (1995) Effective Teaching, Effective Learning: Making the Personality Connexion in the Classroom, Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fini, A. (2009) ‘The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools’, The International Review Of Research In Open And Distance Learning 10(5).

  • Gaebel, M. (2013) ‘MOOCs – Massive open online courses’, EUA Occasional Papers, available at: http://www.eua.be, accessed December 6, 2016.

  • Hew, K.F. and Cheung, W.S. (2014) ‘Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges’, Educational Research Review 12:45–58. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K.F. (2014) ‘Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS’, British Journal of Educational Technology 47(2): 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsenti, T. (2013) ‘MOOC: révolution ou simple effet de mode?’, Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire 10(2): 6–22, available at: http://www.ritpu.org, accessed 6 December 2016.

  • Karsenti, T., Lepage, M. and Gervais, C. (2002) ‘@ccompagnement des stagiaires à l’ère des TIC: Forum électronique ou groupe de discussion?’, Formation et profession 8(2): 7–12. available at: http://www.karsenti.ca/pdf/scholar/ARP-karsenti-19-2002.pdf, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • Khalil, H, and Martin E. ‘MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention—A literature review.’ World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications. No. 1. 2014.

  • Koller, D., Ng., Andrew, Ng., do., C. and Chen, Z. (2013) ‘Retention and Intention in Massive Open Online Courses’, Educause Review (available at: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/, accessed 6 December 2016.

  • Nawrot, I. and Doucet, A. (2014) ‘Building engagement for MOOC students’, Proceedings International World Wide Web Conference, New York: ACM Press, pp. 1077–1082.

  • Onah, D.F.O., Sinclair, J. and Boyatt, R. (2014) ‘Dropout rates of massive open online courses: Behavioural patterns’, EDULEARN14 Proceedings, Barcelona: Spain, pp. 5825–5834, available at: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk, accessed 6 December, 2016.

  • Prince, M. (2004) ‘Does active learning work? A review of the research’, Journal of Engineering Education 93(3), 223–231.

  • Powner, L.C. and Allendoerfer, M.G. (2008), ‘Evaluating hypotheses about active learning’, International Studies Perspectives 9(1): 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffino, N., Cogels, M., Baudewyns, P., Hamonic, E., Legrand, V. and Reuchamps, M.  (2015) ‘Entre taux de rétention passif et taux de rétention actif : une analyse de la motivation à partir du MOOC « Découvrir la science politique » (Louv3x) sur la plateforme edX',  Revue Internationale des Technologies en Pédagogie Universitaire 12(1–2): 23.

  • Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R.A. and Berdan Lozano, J. (2015) ‘Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses’, Internet and Higher Education 24: 1–12, doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallières, C. (2013) ‘L’évaluation des apprentissages: un défi à l’échelle des MOOC’. Perspectives SSF, available at: http://www.usherbrooke.ca, accessed December 6, 2016.

  • Xu, D. and Jaggars, S.S. (2011) ‘The effectiveness of distance education across Virginia’s community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and English courses’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33(3): 360–377, doi:10.3102/0162373711413814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Rosson, M.B., Shih, P.C. and Carroll, J.M. (2015) ‘Understanding student motivation, behaviors, and perceptions in MOOCs’, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 1882–1895. doi:10.1145/2675133.2675217.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Baudewyns.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baudewyns, P., Cogels, M., Dandache, S. et al. teaching political science with a mooc: analysing the supply side and the demand side. Eur Polit Sci 17, 276–295 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0110-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0110-2

Keywords

Navigation