Skip to main content
Log in

Radical Democratic Ethos, or, What is an Authentic Political Act?

  • Feature Article: Theory and Practice
  • Published:
Contemporary Political Theory Aims and scope

Abstract

In this paper I explore some connections between two anti-essentialist approaches to democratic theory — Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe's hegemonic approach and Slavoj Zizek's psychoanalytic approach. I argue that a central virtue of Laclau and Mouffe's hegemonic approach to democracy is that it clearly emphasizes the ethos of democracy, not simply the institutions of democracy. This shift transforms democracy, now conceived as radical democratic ethos, into a site of further research about how to make our understanding of its conditions more theoretically nuanced. In the main bulk of the paper, I explore how Slavoj Zizek's notion of an authentic political act seeks to develop this understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

2For comments on earlier versions of this paper, I thank David Howarth, Aletta Norval, Yannis Stavrakakis, and the two anonymous reviewers of Contemporary Political Theory. For essays exploring similar themes, see Glynos (2000),(2001a),(2001b),(2001c).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glynos, J. Radical Democratic Ethos, or, What is an Authentic Political Act?. Contemp Polit Theory 2, 187–208 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300064

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300064

Keywords

Navigation