Skip to main content
Log in

Enterprise information asset management: the roles and responsibilities of executive boards

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

In the modern organisation the effective management of data, information, content and knowledge is crucial for enhancing competitiveness and growth. There is a profound need for all levels of business management to understand the risks, challenges and business benefit of managing these ‘Information Assets’. This paper describes the results of qualitative empirical research to investigate the roles and responsibilities of Executive Boards to ensure effective management and governance of Information Assets. Personal interviews were conducted with Board members in Australia and the United States. The results indicated that Boards often fail to fully appreciate the strategic value of Information Assets and do not understand the organisational risk and untapped business benefit resulting from ineffective Information Asset Management practices. This paper suggests that Executive Boards should be engaged in discussions about Information Management and fulfil strategic-, control- and institutional roles to guide the way Information Assets are managed and deployed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedford D and Morelli J (2006) Introducing information management into the workplace: a case study in the implementation of business classification file plans from the sector skills development agency. Records Management Journal 16(3), 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley Y and Clarke S (2011) Evaluation of information strategy implementation: a critical approach. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 23(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1990) Acts of Meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge ,MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceeney N (2009) Information management - Headache or Opportunity? The challenges that recent focus on information management is presenting to senior leaders in the public sector. Public Policy and Administration 24, 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo CW (2013) Information culture and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management 33(5), 775–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citroen CL (2011) The role of information in strategic decision-making. International Journal of Information Management 31(6), 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting B and Kouzmin A (2002) Evaluating corporate board cultures and decision making. Corporate Governance 2(2), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges B (1995) Narration of science? Collapsing the division in organization studies. Organization 2(1), 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton JJ and Bawden D (1991) What kind of resource is information? International Journal of Information Management 11(2), 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans N and Price J (2012) Barriers to the effective deployment of information assets: an executive management perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information and Knowledge Management 7, 177–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick U (2006) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(S2), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higson C and Waltho D (2009) Valuing Information as an Asset. White paper, SAS, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne NW (1998) Putting information assets on the board agenda. Long Range Planning 31(1), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter G, Evans A and Price J (2011) Internal intellectual assets: a management interpretation. Journal of Information, Information Technology and Organizations 6, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladley J (2010) Making Enterprise Information Management (EIM) Work for Business: a guide to understanding information as an asset. Morgan Kaufmann, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laney D (2012) Gartner Symposium/ITxpo, Walt Disney World Dolphin, Orlando, FL, 21–25 October.

  • Lerro A, Iacobone LA and Schiuma G (2012) Knowledge assets assessment strategies: organizational value, processes, approaches and evaluation architectures. Journal of Knowledge Management 16(4), 563–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadzean E, Ezingeard J and Birchall D (2007) Perception of risk and the strategic impact of existing IT on information security strategy at board level. Online Information Review 31(5), 622–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB and Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (2005) IT Governance: developing a successful governance strategy. A best practice guide for decision makers in IT. The National Computing Centre, Manchester Available at http://www.ncc.co.uk.

  • Nguyen TN (2013) A different approach to information management by exceptions (toward the prevention of another Enron). Information & Management 51(1), 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim C, Stenson J and Wilson RMS (2001) The attributes of information as an asset. New Library World 102(1170/1171), 458–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price J and Evans N (2013) Information Asset Management: Who is Responsible and Accountable? ECIME, Poland, 12–13 September.

  • Ragab MAF and Arisha A (2013) Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review. Journal of Knowledge Management 17(6), 873–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiuma G (2012) Managing knowledge for business performance improvement. Journal of Knowledge Management 16(4), 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes R (1981) Language, narrative, and anti-narrative. In On Narrativity (Mitchell W Eds) 200–208, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman A (2002) Managing email and e-commerce records. Records Management Journal 12(23), 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiles P and Taylor B (2001) Boards at Work: How Directors View their Roles and Responsibilities. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassmann PA (1985) Information Payoff: The Transformation of Work in the Electronic Age. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A and Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swap W, Leonard D, Schields M and Abrams L (2001) Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge on the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1), 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1972) Episodic and semantic memory. In Organization of Memory (Tulving E and Donaldson W Eds) 381–404, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young S and Thyil V (2008) A holistic model of corporate governance: a new research framework. Corporate Governance 8(1), 94–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfeld B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis A and Fox P (2005) Corporate governance and management of information and records. Records Management Journal 15(2), 86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Evans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evans, N., Price, J. Enterprise information asset management: the roles and responsibilities of executive boards. Knowl Manage Res Pract 14, 353–361 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2014.39

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2014.39

Keywords

Navigation