Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge transfer in alliances: the moderating role of the alliance type

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

We analyse how the impact of determinants of inter-firm knowledge transfers in alliances can be moderated by the proximity of the resources pooled by partners. Six factors are examined: relative absorptive capacity (RAC), inter-partner trust, cultural distance between allies, knowledge ambiguity, knowledge protection, and the partners’ learning intent. We distinguish alliances mobilizing similar resources by partners (called ‘endogamies’ as allies build on their similarities) from alliances pooling different resources (called ‘exogamies’ as allies build on their differences). We propose that: (a) the impact of RAC on knowledge transfers is reinforced in exogamies, but reduced in endogamies; (b) the knowledge ambiguity and cultural distance effect is less in endogamies than in exogamies; (c) the trust and knowledge protection impact is stronger in exogamies than in endogamies; (d) the learning intent impact on knowledge transfers is similar in endogamies and exogamies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Zeid ES (2005) A culturally aware model of inter-organizational knowledge transfer. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 3 (3), 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja G (2000) The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3), 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja G, Lampert CM and Tandon V (2008) Moving beyond Schumpeter: management research on the determinants of technological innovation. The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1), 1–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez SA and Busenitz LW (2001) The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management 27 (6), 755–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L and Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L, McEvily B and Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science 49 (4), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C (2004) The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management 34 (3), 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi T (1994) Trading in strategic resources: necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure. Strategic Management Journal 15 (4), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM and Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99 (397), 569–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM and Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currall SC and Judge TA (1995) Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Process 64 (2), 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darr ED, Argote L and Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: productivity in franchises. Management Science 41 (11), 1750–1762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das TK and Teng BS (1998) Between trust and control: developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review 23 (3), 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das TK and Teng BS (2000) A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management 26 (1), 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson M (1993) Learning, trust, and technological collaboration. Human Relations 46 (1), 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz Y and Hamel G (1998) Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value through Partnership. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussauge P, Garrette B and Mitchell W (2000) Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America, and Asia. Strategic Management Journal 21 (2), 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JS and Kidd JB (2001) Knowledge management when ‘the times they are a-changin’. In Proceedings of the ECKM 2001 Conference (Remenyi D, Ed), pp 171–183, Second European Conference on Knowledge Management; Bled, Slovenia, 5–6 November.

  • George G, Zahra SA, Wheatley KK and Khan R (2001) The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance. A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research 12 (2), 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geringer M (1988) Joint Venture Partner Selection: Strategies for Developing Countries. Quorum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes-Casseres B, Hagedoorn J and Jaffe AB (2006) Do alliances promote knowledge flows? Journal of Financial Economics 80 (1), 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM and Baden-Fuller C (2004) A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies 41 (1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (1991) Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 12 (Summer Special Issue), 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G, Doz Y and Prahalad CK (1989) Collaborate with your competitors, and win. Harvard Business Review 67 (2), 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hau LN and Evangelista F (2007) Acquiring tacit and explicit marketing knowledge from foreign partners in IJVs. Journal of Business Research 60 (11), 1152–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennart JF (1988) A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal 9 (4), 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RC and Hellriegel D (1994) Critical contingencies in joint venture management: some lessons from managers. Organization Science 5 (4), 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ and Minkov M 2010 Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JJ (2009) Knowledge creation in strategic alliances based on an evolutionary perspective: a mathematical representation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 7 (1), 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A (1996) Learning through joint ventures: a framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies 37 (7), 1019–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A (1998a) Learning, knowledge acquisition, and strategic alliances. European Management Journal 16 (2), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A (1998b) Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances. Academy of Management Executive 12 (4), 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A (2000) Learning through joint ventures: a framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies 37 (7), 1019–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A (2002) Learning, knowledge management, and strategic alliances: so many studies, so many unanswered questions. In Cooperative Strategies and Alliances (Contractor FJ and Lorange P, Eds), pp 267–289, Pergamon, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A and Tsang EWK (2007) Learning and strategic alliances. Academy of Management Annals 1 (1), 479–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly D (2002) Alliance strategy: linking motives with benefits. European Business Forum 9 (Spring), 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly D (2004) Bartering technology for local resources in exogamic Sino-foreign joint ventures. R&D Management 34 (4), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly D (2005) The exogamic nature of Sino-foreign joint ventures. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 22 (3), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna T, Gulati R and Nohria N (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal 19 (3), 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim L (1998) Crisis construction and organizational learning: capability building in catching-up at Hyundai motor. Organization Science 9 (4), 506–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B (1988) Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9 (4), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B and Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies 19 (3), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B and Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 (3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R and Nti KO (1998) Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: a process and outcome discrepancy model. Organization Science 9 (3), 356–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane HW and Beamish PW (1990) Cross-cultural cooperative behavior in joint ventures in LDC's. Management International Review 30 (Special Issue), 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane PJ and Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and inter-organizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 19 (5), 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane PJ, Salk J and Lyles MA (2001) Knowledge acquisition and performance in transitional economy international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal 22 (12), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson R, Bengtsson L, Hendriksson K and Sparks J (1998) The inter-organizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science 9 (3), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim K (2009) The many faces of absorptive capacity: spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Industrial and Corporate Change 18 (6), 1249–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin M, Florin J and Lane PJ (2001) Learning together and apart: a model of reciprocal interfirm learning. Human Relations 54 (10), 1353–1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyles M and Salk J (1996) Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies 27 (Special Issue), 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazloomi Khamseh H and Jolly D (2008) Knowledge transfer in alliances: determinant factors. The Journal of Knowledge Management 12 (1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier M (2011) Knowledge management in strategic alliances: a review of empirical evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews 13 (1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mothe C and Quélin B (2000) Creating competencies through collaboration: the case of EUREKA R&D-consortia. European Management Journal 18 (6), 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, Oxley JE and Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and inter-firm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson JA, Hamilton BH and Wada T (2001) Market position, resource profile, and governance: linking Porter and Williamson in the context of international courier and small package services in Japan. Strategic Management Journal 22 (3), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen BB (2005) The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances. Journal of Business Research 58 (9), 1194–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen BB and Nielsen S (2009) Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: an empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies 46 (6), 1031–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman PM (2002) Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances: Resource and relational characteristics. Journal of High Technology Management Research 13 (2), 177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman PM (2004) Knowledge acquisition, knowledge loss, and satisfaction in high technology alliances. Journal of Business Research 57 (6), 610–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olk P (1997) The effect of partner differences on the performance of R&D consortia. In Cooperative Strategies, American Perspectives (Beamish P and Killings J, Eds), pp 133–159, New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley JE and Sampson RC (2004) The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal 25 (8/9), 723–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe A (1991) Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies 22 (4), 579–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: a game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal 36 (4), 794–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Nordtvedt L, Kedia BL, Datta D and Rasheed AA (2008) Effectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer: an empirical examination. Journal of Management Studies 45 (4), 714–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, Koput KW and Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1), 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucik V (1988) Strategic alliances, organizational learning, and competitive advantage: the HRM agenda. Human Resource Management 27 (1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed R and DeFillippi RJ (1990) Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 15 (1), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera Santos M and Dussauge P (2006) Learning and Leakage in Alliances: Benefits and Tradeoffs from Firm-determined Factor. Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts EB and Mizouchi R (1989) Inter-firm technological collaboration: the case of Japanese biotechnology. International Journal of Technology Management 4 (1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara M (1997) Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: an empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal 18 (Summer Special Issue), 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2), 364–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si SX and Bruton GD (1999) Knowledge transfer in international joint ventures in transitional economies: the China experience. Academy of Management Executive 13 (1), 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin B (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 20 (7), 595–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin B (2004) An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (5), 407–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonin BL (1997) The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Journal 40 (5), 1150–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soekijad M and Andriessen M (2003) Conditions for knowledge sharing in competitive alliances. European Management Journal 21 (5), 578–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1993) Intra-firm transfer of best practice, appropriative capabilities, and organizational barriers to appropriation. In 53rd Academy of Management best papers proceedings (Moore DP, Ed), pp 47–51, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15 (6), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorova G and Durisin B (2007) Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Journal 32 (3), 774–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociology Review 61 (4), 674–67 698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volberda HW, Foss NJ and Lyles MA (2010) Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: how to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization science 21 (4), 931–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L and Zajac EJ (2007) Alliance or acquisition? A dyadic perspective on inter-firm resource combinations. Strategic Management Journal 28 (13), 1291–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA and George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, re-conceptualization, and extension. The Academy of Management Review 27 (2), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng M and Hennart J-F (2002) From learning races to cooperative specialization: towards a new framework for alliance management. In Cooperative Strategies and Alliances (Contractor FJ and Lorange P, Eds), pp 189–210, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J and Baden-Fuller C (2010) The influence of technological knowledge base and organizational structure on technology collaboration. Journal of Management Studies 47 (4), 679–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ESC Rennes School of Business, France

    Hamid Mazloomi Khamseh

  2. SKEMA Business School, France

    Dominique Jolly

  3. CEIBS, China

    Dominique Jolly

Authors
  1. Hamid Mazloomi Khamseh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominique Jolly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Jolly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khamseh, H., Jolly, D. Knowledge transfer in alliances: the moderating role of the alliance type. Knowl Manage Res Pract 12, 409–420 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.63

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2012.63

Keywords

Search

Navigation