Abstract
This article presents the case for arbitrating the territorial dispute over the West Bank between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. After nearly two decades of intense intermediary activity but with still no signs of progress, and against the inability of the parties themselves to move towards reconciliation, the article argues that as a method of conflict resolution, mediation has exhausted its primary objective – namely the establishing of direct channels of communication between the disputants – and it is now time to examine alternative methods to conflict resolution. The article debunks the myths surrounding the success of American mediation in the conflict, and uses the historical case of the Taba arbitration between Israel and Egypt to demonstrate under what terms the arbitration of the West Bank dispute might be presented, while taking into consideration its advantages and drawbacks compared with the more established method of mediation in this conflict.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bercovitch, J. and Simpson, L. (2010) International mediation and the question of failed peace agreements: Improving conflict management and implementation. Peace & Change 35 (1): 68–103.
Bowett, D.W. (1989) The Taba award of 29 September 1988. Israel Law Review 23 (1): 429–442.
CIA. (2011) West Bank. World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/we.html#, accessed 11 September.
Copeland, C.S. (1999) The use of arbitration to settle territorial disputes. Fordham Law Review 67 (6): 3073–3076.
Guttman, N. (2011) Latest chapter in mideast tension is Dennis Ross vs. George Mitchell. The Jewish Daily Forward, http://www.forward.com/articles/134642/#ixzz1Aw3VsUte, accessed 12 January.
Hartzell, C. (1999) Explaining the stability of negotiated settlements to intrastate wars. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (1): 3–22.
Hartzell, C., Hoddie, M. and Rothchild, D. (2001) Stabilizing the peace after civil war: An investigation of some key variables. International Organization 55 (1): 183–208.
Makovsky, D. (2010) The Obama administration at midpoint: Taking stock of Israeli-Palestinian mediation. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC07.php?CID=548, accessed 11 September.
Makovsky, D., Chabon, S. and Logan, J. (2011) Imagining the border: Options for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian territorial issue. Washington Institute Strategic Report, http://washingtoninstitute.org/pubPDFs/StrategicReport06.pdf, accessed 11 September.
Malintoppi, L. (2006) Methods of dispute resolution in inter-state litigation: When states go to arbitration rather than adjudication. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 5 (1): 133–162.
Milne, S. (2011) Palestinians weak – and increasingly desperate. The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/23/palestine-papers-power-weakness-negotiationsv, accessed 24 January.
Weil, P. (1989) Some observations on the arbitral award in the Taba case. Israel Law Review 23 (1): 1–25.
Acknowledgements
I would like to acknowledge the support of the Leverhulme Trust under Research Fellowship #RF2011-222
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siniver, A. Arbitrating the Israeli–Palestinian territorial dispute. Int Polit 49, 117–129 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.30
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.30