Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of patient portal utilization: what can we learn about online patient behavior by examining portal click data?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Systems

Abstract

This paper presents a study of online patient portal utilization through the analysis of system logs. We analyze click data generated between August 2009 and July 2011 by 1886 users of an online patient portal. We investigate variations in utilization for Login and the top five system features (Appointment Review, Lab Tests, Medical Advice Request, Messaging and Result Component Graphing), and examine how age and gender influence these variations. Our findings indicate that the effects of age and gender on system use vary by feature, and that efficiency of use (how clicks are spread across sessions) varies across age, gender and feature. We provide a new approach for understanding system use through click data analysis utilizing system logs (an underutilized data source available to all health-care organizations), an example of how big data can help health-care organizations learn more about their patients’ utilization of patient portals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. MAR refers to the secure messaging feature of the system. Through this feature portal users can communicate with their provider team.

  2. The RCG feature provides portal users tools to graph their vital signs and other lab results over time.

References

  • Blumenthal D and Tavenner M (2010) The ‘meaningful use’ regulation for electronic health records. New England Journal of Medicine 363 (6), 501–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RG and Menachemi N (2006) Physicians’ use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices. Journal of Medical Internet Research 8 (1), e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce CL et al (2008) Value versus user fees: perspectives of patients before and after using a web-based portal for management of diabetes. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association 14 (10), 1035–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin RE and Sismeiro C (2009) Click here for internet insight: advances in clickstream data analysis in marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23 (1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrell D and Ralston JD (2006) Variation in adoption rates of a patient web portal with a shared medical record by age, gender, and morbidity level. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium, p. 871, American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Connecting for Health (2008) Americans overwhelmingly believe electronic personal health records could improve their health [WWW document] http://www.markle.org/sites/default/files/ResearchBrief-200806.pdf (accessed 25 August 2015): Markle Foundation.

  • Glass A (2007) Understanding generational differences for competitive success. Industrial and Commercial Training 39 (2), 98–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Cooper AJ, Hasnain-Wynia R and Baker DW (2011) Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portal. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18 (suppl 1), i8–i12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldzweig CL et al (2013) Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 159 (10), 677–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halamka JD, Mandl KD and Tang PC (2008) Early experiences with personal health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 15 (1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassol A et al (2004) Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 11 (6), 505–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang T and Van Mieghem JA (2014) Clickstream data and inventory management: model and empirical analysis. Production and Operations Management 23 (3), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kou G and Lou C (2012) Multiple factor hierarchical clustering algorithm for large scale web page and search engine clickstream data. Annals of Operations Research 197 (1), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuszler PC (2000) A question of duty: common law legal issues resulting from physician response to unsolicited patient email inquiries. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2 (3), e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafky DB and Horan TA (2011) Personal health records. Health Informatics Journal 17 (1), 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeRouge C, Van Slyke C, Seale D and Wright K (2014) Baby Boomers’ adoption of consumer health technologies: survey on readiness and barriers. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16 (9), e200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire J and Dhar V (2012) Comparative effectiveness for oral anti-diabetic treatments among newly diagnosed type 2 diabetics: data-driven predictive analytics in healthcare. Health Systems 2 (2), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menachemi N, Prickett CT and Brooks RG (2011) The use of physician-patient email: a follow-up examination of adoption and best-practice adherence 2005–2008. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13 (1), e23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olbrich R and Holsing C (2011) Modeling consumer purchasing behavior in social shopping communities with clickstream data. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 16 (2), 15–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Or CK and Karsh B-T (2009) A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 16 (4), 550–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn CY, Mayberry LS, Wallston KA, Johnson KB and Elasy TA (2013) Understanding patient portal use: implications for medication management. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15 (7), e133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn CY et al (2011) MyHealthAtVanderbilt: policies and procedures governing patient portal functionality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18 (suppl 1), i18–i23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston JD, Carrell D, Reid R, Anderson M, Moran M and Hereford J (2007) Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14 (6), 798–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders MR et al (2013) Internet access and patient portal readiness among patients in a group of inner-city safety-net practices. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 36 (3), 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (2014) Older adults and technology use: adoption is increasing but many seniors remain isolated from digital life [WWW document] http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/: Pew Research Center (accessed 25 August 2015).

  • Sprague L (2006) Personal health records: the people’s choice? NHPF Issue Brief/National Health Policy Forum, George Washington University, Washington DC, pp. 1–13.

  • Undem T (2010) Consumers and Health Information Technology: A National Survey. California HealthCare Foundation, Oakland, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield DS et al (2012) Consistency of patient preferences about a secure internet-based patient communications portal contemplating, enrolling, and using. American Journal of Medical Quality 27 (6), 494–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald JS (2010) Variations in patient portal adoption in four primary care practices. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2010, p. 837, American Medical Informatics Association, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Wei J, Shen Z, Sundaresan N and Ma K-L (2012) Visual cluster exploration of web clickstream data. 2012 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), IEEE, pp. 3–12.

  • Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z and Sands DZ (2006) Who uses the patient internet portal? The patientsite experience. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13 (1), 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen K-Y, Kreps G, Zhu F and Miller S (2010) Consumers’ perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 health information national trends survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12 (4), e73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye J, Rust G, Fry-Johnson Y and Strothers H (2010) E-mail in patient–provider communication: a systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 80 (2), 266–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YY, Garrido T, Chin HL, Wiesenthal AM and Liang LL (2007) Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. The American Journal of Managed Care 13 (7), 418–424.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Xin Sun for his very helpful assistance in cleaning and preparing the data for exploratory analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bengisu Tulu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tulu, B., Trapp, A., Strong, D. et al. An analysis of patient portal utilization: what can we learn about online patient behavior by examining portal click data?. Health Syst 5, 66–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/hs.2015.5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hs.2015.5

Keywords

Navigation