Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of the Stated Probability of Purchase for Longevity Insurance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the determinants of the stated probability of purchase for a deferred annuity that pays out at age 80 or 85, which we reframe as “longevity insurance”, using the Survey of Household Financial and Risk Management. Our results indicate that younger cohorts and women are more likely to express a desire to purchase longevity insurance in the future. The stated probability of purchase for longevity insurance was lower for respondents with greater home equity and higher coefficients of relative risk aversion. Our results may be of particular interest to policymakers, annuity companies and retirement plan providers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Ruffing (2012).

  2. Arias et al. (2010).

  3. Arias (2007).

  4. Yaari (1965); Davidoff et al. (2005).

  5. The annuity quotes are from CANNEX. The assumed purchase date was 19 November 2014.

  6. James and Song (2001); Beatrice et al. (2004); Johnson et al. (2004); Benartzi et al. (2011).

  7. Arizona Governing Comm. for Tax Deferred Annuity and Deferred Compensation Plans v. Norris (1983).

  8. Turner and McCarthy (2013).

  9. Brown et al. (2008).

  10. See Milevsky and Young (2007); Horneff et al. (2009, 2010).

  11. Cappelletti et al. (2013).

  12. Brown (2001).

  13. Brown et al. (2015); Andersson and Svensson (2008); Frederick (2005).

  14. Scott and Garen (1994).

  15. Ando and Modigliani (1963).

  16. Meara et al. (2008).

  17. Inkmann et al. (2011).

  18. Chandler and Kapelner (2013).

  19. Berinsky et al. (2011).

  20. Paolacci et al. (2010).

  21. Barsky et al. (1997).

  22. Cappelletti et al. (2013); Bütler and Teppa (2007).

  23. As a result of our sample being highly educated and women, we ran separate regressions by groups (highly educated and women) and found no differences in the results. This suggests that our skewed sample is not biasing the results.

  24. Beshears et al. (2014).

  25. Jousten (2001).

  26. Guillemette et al. (2015).

  27. www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl2448.aspx.

References

  • Andersson, H. and Svensson, M. (2008) ‘Cognitive ability and scale bias in the contingent valuation method: An analysis of willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk’, Environmental and Resource Economics 39 (4): 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ando, A. and Modigliani, F. (1963) ‘The“life cycle” hypothesis of saving: Aggregate implications and tests’, The American Economic Review 53 (1): 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, E. (2007) United States Life Tables, 2004, National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 56, No. 9, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, from www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr56/nvsr56_09.pdf, accessed 16 September 2015.

  • Arias, E., Rostron, B.L. and Tejada-Vera, B. (2010) United States Life Tables, 2005, National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 58, No. 10, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

  • Arizona Governing Comm. for Tax Deferred Annuity and Deferred Compensation Plans v. Norris (1983) 463 U.S. 1073, 103 S. Ct. 3492, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1236.

  • Barsky, R.B., Juster, F.T., Kimball, M.S. and Shapiro, M.D. (1997) ‘Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement survey’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 537–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatrice, D.Q., Drinkwater, M. and Sondergeld, E.T. (2004) The 2003 Individual Annuity Market: Sales and Assets, Windsor, CT: LIMRA International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S., Previtero, A. and Thaler, R.H. (2011) ‘Annuitization puzzles’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (4): 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berinsky, A.J., Huber, G.A. and Lenz, G.S. (2011) Using Mechanical Turk as a subject recruitment tool for experimental research, from http://goo.gl/M1nb2m, accessed 16 September 2015.

  • Beshears, J., Choi, J.J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B.C. and Zeldes, S.P. (2014) ‘What makes annuitization more appealing?’ Journal of Public Economics 116: 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R. (2001) ‘Private pensions, mortality risk, and the decision to annuitize’, Journal of Public Economics 82 (1): 29–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., Kapteyn, A., Luttmer, E.F.P. and Mitchell, O. (2015) Cognitive constraints on valuing annuities, from users.nber.org/~luttmer/ssannuity_paper.pdf, accessed 16 September 2015.

  • Brown, J.R., Kling, J.R., Mullainathan, S. and Wrobel, M.V. (2008) ‘Why don’t people insure late life consumption: A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle’, The American Economic Review 98 (2): 304–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bütler, M. and Teppa, F. (2007) ‘The choice between an annuity and a lump sum: Results from Swiss pension funds’, Journal of Public Economics 91 (10): 1944–1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelletti, G., Guazzarotti, G. and Tommasino, P. (2013) ‘What determines annuity demand at retirement’, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice 38 (4): 777–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. and Kapelner, A. (2013) ‘Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 90: 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, T., Brown, J.R. and Diamond, P.A. (2005) ‘Annuities and individual welfare’, American Economic Review 95 (5): 1573–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S. (2005) ‘Cognitive reflection and decision making’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (4): 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillemette, M.A., Browning, C.M. and Payne, P. (2015) ‘Don’t like the picture, change the Frame: The effects of framing and cognitive ability on risky choice’, Applied Economics Letters 22 (18): 1515–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horneff, W.J., Maurer, R.H., Mitchell, O.S. and Stamos, M.Z. (2009) ‘Asset allocation and location over the life cycle with investment-linked survival-contingent payouts’, Journal of Banking & Finance 33 (9): 1688–1699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horneff, W.J., Maurer, R.H., Mitchell, O.S. and Stamos, M.Z. (2010) ‘Variable payout annuities and dynamic portfolio choice in retirement’, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 9 (2): 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkmann, J., Lopes, P. and Michaelides, A. (2011) ‘How deep is the annuity market participation puzzle?’, The Review of Financial Studies 24 (1): 279–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, E. and Song, X. (2001) Annuities markets around the world: Money’s worth and risk intermediation, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies (CeRP) Working Paper No. 16/1.

  • Johnson, R.W., Burman, L.E. and Kobes, D. (2004) Annuitized Wealth at Older Ages: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study, Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jousten, A. (2001) ‘Life-cycle modeling of bequests and their impact on annuity valuation’, Journal of Public Economics 79 (1): 149–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meara, E.R., Richards-Shubik, S. and Cutler, D.M. (2008) ‘The gap gets bigger: Changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981–2000’, Health Affairs 27 (2): 350–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky, M.A. and Young, V.R. (2007) ‘Annuitization and asset allocation’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31 (9): 3138–3177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J. and Ipeirotis, P.G. (2010) ‘Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk’, Judgment and Decision Making 5 (5): 411–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffing, K.A. (2012) What the 2012 Trustees’ Report Shows About Social Security, Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, F. and Garen, J. (1994) ‘Probability of purchase, amount of purchase, and the demographic incidence of the lottery tax’, Journal of Public Economics 54 (1): 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.A. and McCarthy, D.D. (2013) ‘Longevity insurance annuities in 401(k) plans and IRAs’, Benefits Quarterly 29 (1): 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M.E. (1965) ‘Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer’, The Review of Economic Studies 32 (2): 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 Operationalisation of independent variables used in the analysis

Table A2

Table A2 Linear probability regression estimates

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guillemette, M., Martin, T., Cummings, B. et al. Determinants of the Stated Probability of Purchase for Longevity Insurance. Geneva Pap Risk Insur Issues Pract 41, 4–23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2015.26

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2015.26

Keywords

Navigation