Skip to main content
Log in

Frugal Innovation and Development: Aides or Adversaries?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frugal innovation aims to bring products, services and systems within the reach of billions of poor and emerging middle-class consumers. Through significantly cutting costs while safeguarding user value, frugal innovation opens opportunities for new business models and may well disrupt innovation processes in entire economies. The debate on the developmental implications of frugal innovation is ideologically polarized. Whereas advocates suggest a business view of ‘win-win’ in which companies can earn profits while simultaneously alleviating poverty, critics argue that frugal innovation will merely exacerbate capitalist exploitation and inequality. In this contribution we argue that an empirical approach is needed to assess where and when frugal innovation is more likely to enhance inclusive development.

Abstract

Les innovations frugales portent des produits, des services, et des systèmes à la portée de billions de consommateurs pauvres et de l’aspirante classe moyenne. Les innovations frugales baissent les couts et préservent la valeur pour les consommateurs, et créent des nouveaux modèles économiques qui ont le potentiel de perturber les processus d’innovation dans plusieurs économies. Le débat sur les implications développementales de l’innovation frugale est idéologiquement polarisé. Les défenseurs des innovations frugales suggèrent un scenario d’affaires bénéfique pour toutes les parties, ou les entreprises peuvent réaliser des profits simultanément soulageant la pauvreté. Les critiques des innovations frugales soutiennent qu’elles vont simplement augmenter l’exploitation capitale et l’inégalité. Dans cet article, on soutien qu’un approche empirique est nécessaire pour établir où et quand une innovation frugale est plus susceptible de soutenir le développement inclusif.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this article we do not deal with the environmental/ecological dimension.

References

  • Abdelnour, S. and Saeed, A.M. (2014) Technologizing humanitarian space: Darfur advocacy and the rape-stove Panacea. International Political Sociology 8 (2): 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, N. and Brem, A. (2012) Frugal and Reverse Innovation – Literature Overview and Case Study Insights from a German MNC in India and China. In: Proceedings of the 2012 18th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation. June 18–20 2012, Stuttgart: 1–11.

  • Aker, J.C. and Mbiti, I.M. (2010) Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (3): 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, S., Munir, K. and Gregg, T. (2012) Impact at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies 49 (4): 813–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, S. and Romijn, H. (2011) The empty rhetoric of poverty reduction at the base of the pyramid. Organization 19 (4): 481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badiane, K. and Berdish, D. (2011) Comments. Current Anthropology 52 (3): 580–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, N. and Hulme, D. (2014) New development alternatives or business as usual with a new face? The transformative potential of new actors and alliances in development. Third World Quarterly 35 (1): 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Beers, C., Knorringa, P. and Leliveld, A. (2013) Understanding frugal innovation in Africa: Schumpeter revisited. Discussion Paper for the International Workshop ‘The (Mis)Fortune of Frugal Innovation’; 28–29 March, Grenoble, France.

  • van Beers, C., Leliveld, A. and Knorringa, P. (2012) Frugal innovation in Africa: Tracking Unilever’s washing-powder sachets. In: J.-B. Gewald, A. Leliveld and I. Peša (eds.) Transforming Innovations in Africa: Explorative Studies on Appropriation in African Societies. Leiden, The Netherlands and Boston, MA: Brill, pp. 59–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berdegué, J.A. (2005) Pro-Poor Innovation Systems. Background Paper IFAD, Rome, Italy.

  • Bhatti, Y. (2012) What is Frugal, What is Innovation? Towards a Theory of Frugal Innovation. Said Business School, Working Paper, Oxford, UK.

  • Blowfield, M. and Dolan, C.S. (2014) Business as a development agent: Evidence of possibility and improbability. Third World Quarterly 35 (1): 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chataway, J., Hanlin, R. and Kaplinsky, R. (2014) Inclusive innovation: An architecture for policy development. Innovation and Development 4 (1): 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chironga, M., Leke, A., Lund, S. and van Wamelen, A. (2011) Cracking the next growth market: Africa. Harvard Business Review, 89 (5): 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N. et al. (2009) Below the Radar: What Does Innovation in the Asian Driver Economies Have to Offer other Low Income Economies? Innogen Working Paper, Milton Keynes, UK.

  • Cozzens, S. and Sutz, J. (2014) Innovation in informal settings: Reflections and proposals for a research agenda. Innovation and Development 4 (1): 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. and Street, A. (2009) Anthropology at the bottom of the pyramid. Anthropology Today 25 (4): 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C. (2012) The new face of development: The ‘bottom of the pyramid’ entrepreneurs. Anthropology Today 28 (4): 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, C. and Roll, K. (2013) Capital’s new frontier: From ‘unusable’ economies to bottom-of-the-pyramid markets in Africa. African Studies Review 56 (3): 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncombe, R.A. (2012) An evidence-based framework for assessing the potential of mobile finance in sub-saharan Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies 50 (3): 369–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., MacGahan, A.M. and Prabhu, J. (2012) Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies 49 (4): 661–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. (2014) Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus World. Review of International Political Economy 21 (1): 9–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. and Ramamurti, R. (2011) Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal 1 (3–4): 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (2012) Inclusive business, human rights and the dignity of the poor: A glance beyond economic impacts of adapted business models. Business Ethics: A European Review 21 (1): 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, A.L., Kramer, W.J., Tran, J., Katz, R. and Walker, C. (2007) The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. World Resources Institute & IFC report, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.W. and Schaumburg-Müller, H. (2010) Firms in developing countries: A theoretical probe into the borderland of business studies and development studies. European Journal of Development Research 22 (2): 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2014) ICTs and Poverty Eradication: Comparing Economic, Livelihoods and Capabilities Models. Development Informatics Working Paper Series, Manchester, UK.

  • Heeks, R., Foster, C. and Nugroho, Y. (2014) New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innovation and Development 4 (2): 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, N. and Lonie, S. (2007) M-PESA: Mobile money for the ‘unbanked’ turning cellphones into 24-hour tellers in Kenya. Innovations 2 (1–2): 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. (2011) Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy 40 (2): 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. and Farooki, M. (2010) What Are the Implications for Global Value Chains when the Market Shifts from the North to the South? World Bank Working Paper, Washington, DC.

  • Karnani, A. (2007) The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. California Management Review 49 (4): 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M. and Rufin, C. (2013) Reviewing a decade of research on the ‘base/bottom of the pyramid’ (BOP) concept. Business & Society 20 (10): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, N.E. (2007) Advancing the ‘base of the pyramid’ debate. Strategic Management Review 1 (1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, T., Anupindi, R. and Sheth, S. (2010) Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers. Journal of Business Research 63 (6): 582–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, K. and Lindell, I. (2013) ASR forum: Engaging with African informal economies: Social inclusion or adverse incorporation? African Studies Review 56 (3): 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, R.U. and Thelen, N. (2008) Innovations to make markets more inclusive for the poor. Development Policy Review 26 (4): 427–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morawczynski, O. (2009) Exploring the usage and impact of ‘transformational’ mobile financial services: The case of M-PESA in Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies 3 (3): 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J.T., Carmody, P. and Surborg, B. (2014) Industrial transformation or business as usual? Information and communication technologies and Africa’s place in the global information economy. Review of African Political Economy 41 (140): 264–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, T. (2014) How inclusive can innovation and development be in the twenty-first century? Innovation and Development 4 (2): 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peša, I. (2015) The ‘transformational’ potential of mobile money in Zambia: Frugal innovation, inclusive innovation and mobile money agents in Kitwe. Paper Presented at the Workshop ‘Can Frugal Innovation Become Inclusive Innovation; 26–27 November, ISS The Hague, The Netherlands.

  • Prahalad, C.K. (2006) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

  • Prahalad, C.K. (2012) Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29 (1): 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. and Hall, S.L. (2002) The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy+Business 26 (1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radjou, N. (2009) Polycentric innovation: The new global innovation agenda for MNCs. Harvard Business Review online publication, 5 November 2009.

  • Radjou, N. and Prabhu, J. (2014) Frugal Innovation: How to do More with Less. London: Profile Books.

  • Rao, B.C. (2013) How disruptive is frugal? Technology in Society 35 (1): 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, F. (2014) Innovation for inclusive development. Innovation and Development 4 (1): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulpen, L. and Gibbon, P. (2002) Private sector development: Policies, practices and problems. World Development 30 (1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E.F. (1973) Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Vintage.

  • Schumpeter, J. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwittay, A. (2011) The marketization of poverty. Current Anthropology 52 (3): 571–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szirmai, A. (2005) The Dynamics of Socio-Economic Development: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2010) First break all the rules. 15 April.

  • Tiwari, R. and Herstatt, C. (2012) Open Global Innovation Networks as Enablers of Frugal Innovation: Propositions Based on Evidence from India. Hamburg, Germany. Institute for Technology and Innovation Management Working Paper, Hamburg, Germany.

  • Tiwari, R., Kalogerakis, K. and Herstatt, C. (2014) Frugal innovation and analogies: Some propositions for product development in emerging economies. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, June 3–6, Stuttgart, Germany: 15–23.

  • World Bank (2010) Innovation Policy: A Guide for Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

  • Ya’u, Y. (2004) The new imperialism & Africa in the global electronic village. Review of African Political Economy 31 (99): 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeschky, M., Winterhalter, S. and Gassmann, O. (2014) From cost to frugal and reverse innovation: Mapping the field and implications for global competitiveness. Research Technology Management 57 (4): 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Knorringa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knorringa, P., Peša, I., Leliveld, A. et al. Frugal Innovation and Development: Aides or Adversaries?. Eur J Dev Res 28, 143–153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.3

Keywords

Navigation