Abstract
This paper examines how China's heavily managed exchange rate contributes to its huge trade surplus with its major trading partners, most notably the United States. Based on the distinction between economies’ aggregate output and expenditure and on the premise that exchange rates are shared variables, it develops a straightforward framework that shows how exchange rate management by China's central bank affects China's fast growing output, expenditure, employment, and trade balance, while simultaneously influencing these aggregates in its slower growing industrialized trading partners. This framework reveals that under conditions of limited private capital mobility an inflexible yuan yields higher short-run output gains for China at trading partners’ expense through a form of “exchange rate protection.” At the same time exchange rate misalignment limits China's consumption and hence living standards. A misaligned currency is also shown to bias international saving and investment flows and is central to any explanation of global imbalances.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, Sidney . 1952. “Effects of a Devaluation on a Trade Balance.” IMF Staff Papers, 2: 263–278.
Aziz, Jahangir, and Li Cui . 2007. “Explaining China's Low Consumption: the Neglected Role of Household Income,” IMF Working Paper 07/181, Washington DC.
Aziz, Jahangir, and Steven Dunaway . 2007. “China's Rebalancing Act.” Finance and Development, 44 (3): 27–31.
Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen, and Yongqing Wang . 2007. “United States-China Trade at the Commodity Level and the Yuan-Dollar Exchange Rate.” Contemporary Economic Policy, 25 (3): 341–361.
Bank for International Settlements (BIS). 2006. BIS Annual Report, BIS Basle.
Branson, William . 1983. “Macroeconomic Determinants of Real Exchange Rates,” in Managing Foreign Exchange Risk, edited by Richard Herring Cambridge University Press.
Calvo, Guillermo, and Carmen Reinhart . 2002. “Fear of Floating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 379–408.
Chou, W., and Y. Shih . 1998. “The Equilibrium Exchange Rate of the Chinese Rinminbi.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 26: 165–174.
Frenkel, Jacob, and Michael Mussa . 1985. “Asset Markets, Exchange Rates and the Balance of Payments,” in Handbook of International Economics, edited by Ronald Jones and Peter Kenen, Vol. 2, Ch. 14, 679–747 North Holland, Amsterdam.
Hausmann, Ricardo, Ugo Panizza, and Ernesto Stein . 2001. “Why Do Countries Float the Way They Float?” Journal of Development Economics, 66 (4): 387–414.
Hu, Xiaolian . 2007. “China's Approach to Reform.” Finance and Development, 44 (3): 36–37.
International Monetary Fund, 2006. People's Republic of China: 2006 Article IV Consultation, October, IMF.
International Monetary Fund, 2007. Multilateral Consultation on Global Imbalances, www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2007/pr0772.htm.w.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2007/pr0772.htm.
Isard, Peter . 1995. Exchange Rate Economics. Cambridge University Press.
Ito, Hiro, and M. Menzie Chinn . 2007. “East Asia and Global Imbalances: Saving, Investment and Financial Development,” NBER Working Paper W13364, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jeong, Se-eun, and Jacques Mazier . 2003. “Exchange Rate Regimes and Equilibrium Exchange Rates in East Asia.” Revue Economique, 54 (5): 1161–1182.
Koo, Won, and Renan Zhuang . 2007. “The Role of Exchange Rate in Sino-U.S. Bilateral Trade.” Contemporary Economic Policy, 25 (3): 362–373.
Sarno, Lucio, and Mark Taylor . 2002. The Economics of Exchange Rates. Cambridge University Press.
World Bank. 2008. World Development Indicators 2008. World Bank.
Zhang, Zichao . 2001. “Real Exchange Rate Misalignment in China: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 29: 80–94.
Additional information
*Anthony J. Makin is Professor of Economics, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Australia. He has previously served in the Australian federal departments of Finance, Foreign Affairs and Trade, and Treasury, and as an International Consultant Economist with the IMF Institute.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makin, A. Is China's Exchange Rate Policy a Form of Trade Protection?. Bus Econ 44, 80–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/be.2008.8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/be.2008.8