Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting the oral glucose tolerance test criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes retained the 2-hour glucose concentration on an oral glucose tolerance test of ≥11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) as a criterion to diagnose diabetes. Since glycated hemoglobin levels have emerged as the best measure of long-term glycemia and an important predictor of microvascular and neuropathic complications, we evaluated the distribution of hemoglobin A1C (Hb A1C) levels in individuals who had undergone an oral glucose tolerance test to determine how well 2-hour values could identify those with normal versus increased Hb A1C levels.

DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of 2 large data sets was performed. We cross-tabulated 2-hour glucose concentrations on an oral glucose tolerance test separated into 4 intervals (<7.8 mmol/L [140 mg/dL], 7.8–11.0 mmol/L [140–199 mg/dL], 11.1–13.3 mmol/L [200–239 mg/dL], and ≥13.3 mmol/L [240 mg/dL]) with Hb A1C levels separated into 3 intervals (normal; <1% above the upper limit of normal; and greater than or equal to the upper limit of normal +1%).

RESULTS: Approximately two thirds of patients in both data sets with 2-hour glucose concentrations of 11.1 to 13.3 mmol/L (200–239 mg/dL) had normal Hb A1C levels. In contrast, 60% to 80% of patients in both data sets with 2-hour glucose concentrations ≥13.3 mmol/L (240 mg/dL) had elevated Hb A1C levels.

CONCLUSION: Since Hb A1C levels are the best measures presently available that reflect long-term glycemia, we conclude that the 2-hour glucose concentration criterion on an oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of diabetes should be raised from ≥11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) to ≥13.3 mmol/L (240 mg/dL) to remain faithful to the concept that diagnostic concentrations of glucose should predict the subsequent development of specific diabetic complications (e.g., retinopathy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Valleron AJ, Eschwege E, Papoz, Rosselin GE. Agreement and discrepancy in the evaluation of normal and diabetic oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes. 1975;24:585–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes. 1979;28:1039–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus: Second Report, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1980. Technical Report 646.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jarrett RJ, Keen H. Hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1976;2:1009–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sayegh HA, Jarrett RJ. Oral glucose-tolerance tests and the diagnosis of diabetes: results of a prospective study based on the Whitchall survey. Lancet. 1979;2:431–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pettitt DJ, Knowler WC, Lisse JR, Bennett PH. Development of retinopathy and proteinuria in relation to plasma-glucose concentrations in Pima Indians. Lancet. 1980;2:1050–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson MB, Peters AL, Schriger DL. An alternative approach to the diagnosis of diabetes with a review of the literature. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:1065–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Expert Committee. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1183–97.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bucala R, Cerami A, Vlassara H. Advanced glycosylation end products in diabetic complications. Diabetes Rey. 1995;3:258–68.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen MP, Sharma K, Jin Y, et al. Prevention of diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice with glycated albumin antagonists. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2338–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clements RS Jr, Robsion WG Jr, Cohen MP. Antiglycated albumin therapy ameliorates early retinal microvascular pathology in db/db mice. J Diabetes Complications. 1998;12:28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura S, Makita Z, Ishikawa S, et al. Progression of nephropathy in spontaneous diabetic rats is prevented by OPB-9195, a novel inhibitor of advanced glycation. Diabetes. 1997;46:895–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The relationship of glycemic exposure (Hgb A1C) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes. 1995;44:968–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krolewski AS, Laffel LMB, Krolewski M, Quinn M, Warram JH. Glycosylated hemoglobin and the risk of microalbuminuria in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1251–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995;28:103–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanaka Y, Atsumi Y, Matsuoka K, Onuma T, Tohjima T, Kawamori R. Role of glycemic control and blood pressure in the development and progression of nephropathy in elderly Japanese NIDDM patients. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:116–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson MB, Schriger DL, Peters AL, Lorber B. Relationship between fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin: potential for false-positive diagnoses of type 2 diabetes using new diagnostic criteria. JAMA. 1999;281:1203–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters AL, Davidson MB, Schriger DL, Hasselblad V. A clinical approach for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 1996;276:1246–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harris MI, Eastman RC, Cowie CC, Flegal KM, Eberhardt MS. Comparison of diabetes diagnostic categories in the U.S. population according to 1997 American Diabetes Association and 1980–1985 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1859–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:518–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Davidson MB. Diabetes care in health maintenance organization and fee-for-service settings. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 1997;2:189–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(suppl 1):S32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tattersall RB, Jackson GL. Social and emotional complications of diabetes. In: Keen H, Jarret J, eds. Complications of Diabetes. Chicago, Ill: Yearbook Medical Publishers, Inc.; 1982:271.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Knowler WC. Screening for NIDDM: opportunities for detection, treatment and prevention. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:445–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris MI, Cowie CC, Eastman R. Health-insurance coverage for adults with diabetes in the U.S. population. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:585–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayer B. Davidson MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davidson, M.B., Schriger, D.L., Peters, A.L. et al. Revisiting the oral glucose tolerance test criterion for the diagnosis of diabetes. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 551–555 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08024.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08024.x

Key words

Navigation