Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physicians’ reports of focused expertise in clinical practice

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about the prevalence of focused expertise (special areas of expertise within a clinical field) among physicians, yet such expertise may influence how care is delivered. We surveyed general internists, pediatricians, cardiologists, infectious disease specialists, and orthopedic surgeons to describe the prevalence of focused expertise and identify associated physician and practice characteristics. About one quarter of generalists and three quarters of specialists reported a focused expertise within their primary specialty. Hospital-based physicians more often reported such expertise, and physicians reimbursed by capitation less often reported expertise. Learning how focused expertise affects processes and outcomes of care will contribute to decisions about physician training and staffing of medical groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Beeson PB. The natural history of medical subspecialties. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:624–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Langsley DG, Darragh JH, ed. Trends in Specialization: Tomorrow’s Medicine. Evanston, Ill: American Board of Medical Specialties; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Physicians. The role of the future general internist defined. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:616–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fogelman AM. Strategies for training generalists and subspecialists. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:579–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Butzin DW, Guerin RO, Langdon LO, Irwin CE. The certification process in adolescent medicine. J Adolesc Health. 1998;23:328–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. The American Board of Medical Specialties. 1999 Annual Report and Reference Handbook. Evanston, Ill: American Board of Medical Specialties; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keating NL, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Physicians’ experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation. JAMA. 1998; 280:900–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kassirer JP, Gorry A. Clinical problem solving: a behavioral analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1978;89:245–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hannan EL, Kilburn H, Bernard H, O’Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP. Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors. Med Care. 1991;29:1094–1107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Donohoe MT. Comparing generalist and specialty care: discrepancies, deficiencies, and excesses. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1596–1608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrold LR, Field TS, Gurwitz JH. Knowledge, patterns of care, and outcomes of care for generalists and specialists. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:499–511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. Internal medicine: whole or in pieces? Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:978–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. What is the future of internal medicine? Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:1144–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Conti CR. President’s page: concerns about fragmentation of adult cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:532–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nolan JP. Internal medicine in the current health care environment: a need for reaffirmation. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:857–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Organ CH. Fragmentation and specialization. Arch Surg. 1987;122:639.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jordan GL Jr. The future of general surgery. Am J Surg. 1991;161:194–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American Medical Association. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S. 1997–98 ed. Chicago, Ill: Survey and Data Resources; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy L. Keating MD, MPH.

Additional information

Dr. Keating was the recipient of a National Research Service Award from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, Dr. Ayanian was a Generalist Physician Faculty Scholar of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ. This study was supported by the Primary Care Research and Education Fund of Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keating, N.L., Zaslavsky, A.M. & Ayanian, J.Z. Physicians’ reports of focused expertise in clinical practice. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 417–420 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08003.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08003.x

Key words

Navigation