Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the hip and accuDEXA of the finger for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men on androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) of the hip or spine has been shown to be an effective screening tool for osteoporosis in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for advanced carcinoma of the prostate. A less expensive alternative to DEXA is the use of peripheral scanners, such as accuDEXA, which measures bone mineral density (BMD) the finger. In this paper, we reviewed 59 patients on ADT who underwent both accuDEXA scan of the non-dominant hand and DEXA scan of the hip. The mean T-scores calculated by the two techniques were similar; however, the individual T-scores correlated poorly with each other. We conclude that men who require ADT for prostate cancer should undergo standard DEXA of the hip for osteoporosis screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ross RW, Small EJ . Osteoporosis in men treated with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 2002; 167: 1952–1956.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanis JA . Osteoporosis III: diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 2002; 359: 1929–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Michaeli DA, Mirshahi A, Singer J, Rapa F, Plass DB, Bouxsein M . A new X-ray based osteoporosis screening tool provides accurate and precise assessment of bone mineral content. J Clin Densitom 1998; 2: 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fiter J, Nolla JM, Gomez-Vaquero C, Martinez-Aguila D, Valverde J, Roig-Escofet D . A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women. Osteoporo Int 2001; 12: 565–569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniell HW . Osteoporosis after orchiectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1997; 157: 439–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McGrath SA, Diamond T . Osteoporosis as a complication of orchiectomy in 2 elderly men with prostatic cancer. J Urol 1995; 154: 535–536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oefelein MG, Resnick MI . The impact of osteoporosis in men treated for prostate cancer. Urol Clin N Am 2004; 31: 313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walsh PC, DeWeese TL, Eisenberger MA . A structured debate: immediate versus deferred androgen suppression in prostate cancer – evidence for deferred treatment. J Urol 2001; 166: 508–516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Diamond TH, Higano CS, Smith MR, Guise TA, Singer FR . Osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma receiving androgen-deprivation therapy. Cancer 2004; 100: 892–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein BS, Ashok S . Osteoporosis and the aging male. Med Health Rhode Island 2002; 85: 160–162.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kanis JA, Gluer CC . Position paper: an update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11: 192–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B S Stein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bae, D., Leocadio, D. & Stein, B. A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the hip and accuDEXA of the finger for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in men on androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10, 94–96 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500913

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.pcan.4500913

  • Springer Nature Limited

Keywords

Navigation