Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid in the Preterm Population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Perinatology Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have assessed the significance of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) at term. However, to date, there has been very little documentation on the incidence and significance of meconium in the preterm population. Our objective was to define the incidence of MSAF in patients delivering prematurely (<37 weeks) and examine its association with underlying fetal acidosis, Apgars and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHOD: All patients delivering at a single tertiary care center between June 1994 and September 1997 were reviewed for the presence of meconium and gestational age <37 weeks at delivery. Maternal demographics and birth outcomes including cord gases, Apgar scores and admission to the NICU were collected. Exclusion criteria included multiple gestations, breech presentations, fetal anomalies and patients not in labor.

RESULTS: Out of a total of 9570 patients there were 506 (5.3%) preterm births meeting the inclusion criteria, of whom 24 (4.8%) had MSAF noted either during labor or at delivery. Comparing the preterm group with and without meconium, there were no differences in maternal age, gravidity, rate of Cesarean section, or gestational age at delivery. Cord pH (7.27 meconium vs. 7.29 no meconium) and base excess (−5.1 meconium vs. −4.0 no meconium) were similar in both groups. There were no clinically significant differences in mean Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes. However, an increased number of NICU admissions were noted in the group with meconium (75% vs. 53%, p=0.04).

CONCLUSION: The incidence of meconium staining of the amniotic fluid in labor in the preterm population is less than 5% and by itself is not a significant marker of fetal acidosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berkus MD, Langer O, Samueloff A, Xenakis EMJ, Field NT, Ridgway LE Meconium-stained amniotic fluid: increased risk for adverse neonatal outcome Obstet Gynecol 1994 84 115–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morel MG, Anyaegbunam AM, Mikhail MS, Legorreta A, Whitty J Oxytocin augmentation in arrest disorders in the presence of thick meconium: influence on neonatal outcome Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994 37 21–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nathan L, Leveno K, Carmody TJ, Kelly MA, Sherman ML Meconium: a 1990's perspective on an old obstetric hazard Obstet Gynecol 1994 83 329–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Steer PJ, Eigbe F, Lissauer TJ, Beard RW Interrelationships among abnormal cardiotocograms in labor, meconium staining of the amniotic fluid, arterial cord blood pH, and apgar scores Obstet Gynecol 1989 74 715–720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meis PJ, Hobel CJ, Ureda JR Late meconium passage in labor — a sign of fetal distress? Obstet Gynecol 1982 59 332–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krebs HB, Petres RE, Dunn LJ, Jordaan HVF, Segreti A Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: association of meconium with abnormal fetal heart rate patterns Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980 137 936–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Starks GC Correlation of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, early intrapartum fetal pH and apgar scores as predictors of perinatal outcome Obstet Gynecol 1980 56 604–609

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazor M, Furman B, Wiznitzer A, Shoham-Vardi I, Cohen J, Ghezzi F Maternal and perinatal outcome of patients with preterm labour and meconium stained amniotic fluid Obstet Gynecol 1995 86 830–833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen R The significance of meconium in midtrimester amniocentesis Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985 152 413–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Creasy RK, Resnik R Maternal–Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1994 p. 416

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sienko A, Altshuler G Meconium induced umbilical vascular necrosis in abortuses and fetuses: a histopathologic study fro cytokines Obstet Gynecol 1999 94 415–420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spinillo A, Fazzi E, Capuzzo E, Stronati M, Piazzi G, Ferrari A Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and risk for cerebral palsy in preterm infants Obstet Gynecol 1997 90 (4) 519–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller FC, Sacks DA, Yeh Sze-Ya, et al Significance of meconium during labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975 122 573–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yeomans ER, Gilstrap LC, Leveno KJ, Burris JS Meconium in the amniotic fluid and fetal acid–base status Obstet Gynecol 1989 73 175–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dijxhoorn MJ, Visser GHA, Fidler VJ, Touwen BCL, Huisjes HJ Apgar score, meconium and acidaemia at birth in relation to neonatal neurological morbidity in term infants Br J Obstet Gynecol 1986 93 217–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Altshuler G, Arizawa M, Molnar-Nadasdy G Meconium induced umbilical cord vascular necrosis and ulceration: a potential link between the placenta and poor pregnancy outcome Obstet Gynecol 1992 79 760–766

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Richey SD, Ramin SM, Bawdon RE, et al Markers of acute and chronic asphyxia in infants with meconium-stained amniotic fluid Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 172 1212–1215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, H., Walker, M. & Gruslin, A. Significance of Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid in the Preterm Population. J Perinatol 21, 174–177 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200521

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200521

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

This article is cited by

Navigation