Skip to main content
Log in

Nebivolol vs enalapril in the treatment of essential hypertension: a double-blind randomised trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Human Hypertension Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy and acceptability of nebivolol 5 mg and enalapril 10 mg, each given once daily, were compared in essential hypertension in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial over 3 months. For the index pre-declared variable, sitting diastolic pressure at trough drug level, nebivolol achieved greater falls in pressure (−12.3 vs −9.9 mm Hg; P = 0.009) and a higher response rate (70% vs 55%; P = 0.002). The trough-to-peak sitting diastolic ratios also favoured nebivolol (84% vs 60%, P = 0.002). Nebivolol, but not enalapril, slightly but significantly lowered heart rate. Both drugs were well-tolerated, although enalapril was accompanied by a significantly higher incidence of coughing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Nueten, L., Schelling, A., Vertommen, C. et al. Nebivolol vs enalapril in the treatment of essential hypertension: a double-blind randomised trial. J Hum Hypertens 11, 813–819 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000550

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1000550

  • Springer Nature Limited

Keywords

This article is cited by

Navigation