Skip to main content
Log in

Fewer false positives in electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction by synergizing theory and experiment

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Computational Science

View current issue Submit your manuscript

The electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction is a promising alternative to the Haber–Bosch process. However, the reproducibility and reliability of this process suffer from the persistence of false positives. Computational tools have the potential to alleviate this issue but several challenges must be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: False positives in the electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction (eNRR) and computational approaches to eliminating them.

References

  1. Ornes, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2119584118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Soloveichik, G. Nat. Catal. 2, 377–380 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi, J. et al. Nat. Commun. 11, 5546 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenlee, L. F., Renner, J. N. & Foster, S. L. ACS Catal. 8, 7820–7827 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, G. F. et al. Small Methods 3, 1800337 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao, Y. et al. Adv. Sci. 6, 1802109 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersen, S. Z. et al. Nature 570, 504–508 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, G., Cai, C., Zhao, W., Liu, Y. & Wang, T. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 13, e1654 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, G., Cai, C. & Wang, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 23089–23095 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, M., Raucci, U. & Parrinello, M. Nat. Catal. 6, 829–836 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sundararaman, R., Goddard, W. A. & Arias, T. A. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 114104 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Melander, M., Wu, T. & Honkala, K. Preprint at ChemRxiv https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2021-r621x-v3 (2023).

  13. Yang, Y. et al. ACS Catal. 11, 1136–1178 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Editorial. Nat. Commun. 13, 4642 (2022).

  15. Li, K. et al. Science 374, 1593–1597 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22273076 to T.W.) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA0911900); T.W. acknowledges start-up packages from Westlake University and the Kunpeng research fund from Zhejiang Province. We thank the Research Center for Industries of the Future (RCIF) at Westlake University for supporting this work. We thank Westlake University HPC Center for computation support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T.W. conceived the research; G.M.X. wrote the first draft; all authors edited and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Computational Science thanks Yaqiong Su and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, G., Wang, T. Fewer false positives in electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction by synergizing theory and experiment. Nat Comput Sci 3, 994–997 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00556-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00556-6

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation