Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lessons from withdrawn accelerated approvals in oncology

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Cancer

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Drug regulatory agencies in the USA and Europe have mechanisms to provide patients faster access to novel treatments, expecting that follow-up trials will confirm clinically meaningful results. However, some early approvals are subsequently withdrawn. Here we discuss the insights gained from withdrawn accelerated approvals for oncologic agents in the past decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Tap, W. D. et al. Lancet 388, 488–497 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tap, W. D. et al. JAMA 323, 1266–1276 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmid, P. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 2108–2121 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miles, D. et al. Ann. Oncol. 32, 994–1004 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherny, N. I. et al. Ann. Oncol. 26, 1547–1573 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galsky, M. D. et al. Lancet 395, 1547–1557 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Powles, T. et al. Lancet Oncol 21, 1574–1588 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bachy, E. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 242–251 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shustov, A. R. et al. Blood 122, 4385 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schiller, G. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 6527–6527 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deitcher, S. R. & Silverman, J. A. Blood 120, 4300 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gopal, A. K. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 1008–1018 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gribben, J. G. et al. Blood 136, 37–39 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Flinn, I. W. et al. Blood 132, 2446–2455 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Flinn, I. W. et al. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 912–922 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantial contribution to researching data and articles for this work, discussions of content, generating tables and figures, writing the manuscript and editing the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tito Fojo or Susan E. Bates.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Note

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mellgard, G.S., Fojo, T. & Bates, S.E. Lessons from withdrawn accelerated approvals in oncology. Nat Cancer 5, 211–215 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-023-00696-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-023-00696-8

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation