Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

All scales must be considered to understand rifts

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Earth & Environment

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Feedbacks between chemical, physical, and biological processes at rift zones evolve through various time (seconds to 107 yrs) and spatial (microns to 106 m) scales. Consideration of these scales is needed to tap rift energy, water, and mineral resources safely and equitably while preserving biodiversity in these changing settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Structure and timescales of rifting.

References

  1. Ebinger, C. J. et al. The time scales of continental rifting: Implications for global processes. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 500, 371–396 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grandin, R. et al. Sequence of rifting in Afar, Manda‐Hararo rift, Ethiopia, 2005–2009: Time‐space evolution and interactions between dikes from interferometric synthetic aperture radar and static stress change modeling. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB000815 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zheng, W. et al. Aseismic deformation during the 2014 Mw 5.2 Karonga earthquake, Malawi, from satellite interferometry and earthquake source mechanisms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL090930 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xue, L. et al. Seasonal seismicity in the western branch of the East African rift system. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2019GL085882 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olaka, L. A. et al. The sensitivity of East African rift lakes to climate fluctuations. J. Paleolimnol. 44, 629–644 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vidal, C. M. et al. Geochronology and glass geochemistry of major Pleistocene eruptions in the Main Ethiopian Rift: Towards a regional tephrostratigraphy. Quat. Sci. Rev. 290, 107601 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Knight, E. E. et al. HOSS: an implementation of the combined finite-discrete element method. Comp. Part. Mech. 7, 765–787 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhasme, P. et al. Enhancing predictive skills in physically-consistent way: Physics Informed Machine Learning for hydrological processes. J. Hydrol. 615, 128618 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. North, M. A. et al. Out of Africa: The underrepresentation of African authors in high-impact geoscience literature. Earth Sci. Rev. 208, 103262 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muirhead, J. D. et al. Displaced cratonic mantle concentrates deep carbon during continental rifting. Nature 582, 67–72 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Einat Aharanov for stimulating discussions of fluid and gas processes. CJE and JVW acknowledge NSF grant OCE 2025577. This is Los Alamos National Laboratory contribution LA-UR-23-21602.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors researched data for the article and contributed to the content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cynthia Ebinger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebinger, C., van Wijk, J., Olaka, L. et al. All scales must be considered to understand rifts. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4, 209–210 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00408-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00408-x

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation