Skip to main content
Log in

Medical artificial intelligence is as much social as it is technological

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Machine Intelligence

View current issue Submit your manuscript

Despite the promise of medical artificial intelligence applications, their acceptance in real-world clinical settings is low, with lack of transparency and trust being barriers that need to be overcome. We discuss the importance of the collaborative process in medical artificial intelligence, whereby experts from various fields work together and tackle transparency issues and build trust over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Tonekaboni, S., Joshi, S., McCradden, M. D. & Goldenberg, A. Proc. 4th Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference 106, 359–380 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grote, T. & Berens, P. J. Med. Eth. 46, 205–211 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Montani, S. & Striani, M. Yearb. Med. Inform. 28, 120–127 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Markus, A. F., Kors, J. A. & Rijnbeek, P. R. J. Biomed. Inform. 113, 103655 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shortliffe, E. H. & Sepùlveda, M. J. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 320, 2199–2200 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. London, A. J. Hastings Cent. Rep. 49, 15–21 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Baalen, S. & Carusi, A. Synthese 196, 4469–4492 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Winter, P. & Carusi, A. Sci. Technol. Stud. 35, 58–77 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Winter, P. & Carusi, A. Med. Humanit. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2021-012318 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Winter, P. & Carusi, A. J. Responsib. Technol. 12, 100052 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oakden-Rayner, L. https://lukeoakdenrayner.wordpress.com/2018/01/24/chexnet-an-in-depth-review/ (24 January 2018).

  12. Scheek, D., Rezazade Mehrizi, M. H. & Ranschaert, E. Eur. Radiol. 31, 7960–7968 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elish, M. C. & Watkins, E. A. Data & Society https://datasociety.net/pubs/repairing-innovation.pdf (2020).

  14. Oakden-Rayner, L. & Palmer, L. J. in Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (eds Ranschaert, E. R., Morozov, S. & Algra, P. R.) 83–104 (Springer, 2019).

  15. Nagendran, M. et al. Br. Med. J. 368, m689 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carusi, A. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 48, 28–37 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carusi, A. Humana-Mente J. Philos. Stud. 30, 67–86 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Anderson for helpful feedback. The research informing this Comment was supported by a Wellcome Grant for the project ‘AI in the Clinic’ (grant number WT/213606).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter D. Winter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Machine Intelligence thanks James Anderson for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carusi, A., Winter, P.D., Armstrong, I. et al. Medical artificial intelligence is as much social as it is technological. Nat Mach Intell 5, 98–100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00603-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00603-3

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Navigation