Skip to main content
Log in

The risk of oversight

  • Protocol Review
  • Published:
Lab Animal

A clear organizational reporting structure within the Animal Care and Use Program and a collegial working relationship between the Institutional Official, Attending Veterinarian and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee are essential to maintain the highest standards of animal wellbeing and research quality. We invited experts from The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research (Michelle Aparicio) and Rice University (Sarah Viranda and Elysse Ann Orchard), along with USDA and OLAW representatives (Louis DiVincenti and Axel Wolff), to respond to a challenging situation at Great Eastern University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Van Sluyters, R. C. ILAR J. 49, 372–378 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidebook 2nd edn. 32 (US Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, 2002).

  3. Public Health Service. PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 2015).

  4. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edn. (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2011).

  5. Animal Welfare Regulations. 9 CFR § 2.31.

  6. Animal Welfare Regulations. 9 CFR § 2.33.

  7. Animal Welfare Regulations. 9 CFR § 1.1.

Download references

Acknowledgements

OLAW would like to acknowledge Neera Gopee (Associate Director for Animal Welfare Policy), Jane Na (Director, Division of Assurances), Brent Morse (Director, Division of Compliance Oversight) and Nicolette Petervary (Director, Division of Compliance Oversight) for their contribution to the preparation of the response.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Danridge.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Disclaimer The views expressed in “A word from OLAW and USDA” represent the positions of OLAW/NIH and USDA, respectively, but the remainder of the contributions in this article do not represent official support or an endorsement by NIH, USDA, or any government agency.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danridge, L., Greer, B., Aparicio, M. et al. The risk of oversight. Lab Anim 53, 81–84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-024-01348-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-024-01348-9

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation