Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to ‘Defining distance restraints in HADDOCK’

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature Protocols

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Crystal structure of the HOP2–MND1 heterodimer and selected best protein complex models obtained after the final HADDOCK docking step.

References

  1. Orbán-Németh, Z. et al. Nat. Protoc. 13, 478–494 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van Zundert, G. C. P. et al. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 720–725 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonvin, A. M. J. J., Karaca, E., Kastritis, P. L. & Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M. Nat. Protoc. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0017-6 (2018).

  4. Karaca, E., Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M., Graziadei, A., Bonvin, A. M. J. J. & Carlomagno, T. Nat. Methods 14, 897–902 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Vries, S. J., van Dijk, M. & Bonvin, A. M. Nat. Protoc. 5, 883–897 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rampler, E. et al. J. Proteome Res. 14, 5048–5062 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang, H.-A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 3841–3856 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pettersen, E. F. et al. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herzog, F. et al. Science 337, 1348–1352 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yılmaz, Ş. et al. Anal. Chem. 88, 9949–9957 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song, J.-G. et al. Structure 23, 558–570 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (SFB F34: Z.O.-N., E.R., T.S.). We thank IMP and IMBA for general funding. Molecular graphics and analyses were performed with the UCSF Chimera package. Chimera is developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco (supported by NIGMS P41-GM103311). Images in Chimera were created using Persistence of Vision Raytracer (version 3.6), Persistence of Vision, Pty. Ltd. (2004), retrieved from http://www.povray.org/download/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Mechtler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Crystal structure of the PPP2R1A–PPP2CA complex and selected best protein complex models obtained after the final HADDOCK docking step.

(a) Selected model after re-calculation using the correct distance restraints between residues. This model displayed the best HADDOCK score among the models satisfying all three cross-links and a high XL score. (b) Selected model after re-calculation using the correct distance restraints between specific atoms. This model displayed the best HADDOCK score and XL score. (c) Selected model as presented in our protocol, calculated using the erroneously short distance restraints. (d) Crystal structure of the PPP2R1A–PPP2CA complex: PDB entry 2IAE. (a-d) Cross-links are shown in green. PPP2R1A and PPP2CA are colored light and dark, respectively

Supplementary Figure 2 Crystal structure of the plectin-calmodulin complex and selected best protein complex models obtained after the final HADDOCK docking step.

(a) Selected model after re-calculation using the correct distance restraints between residues. This model displayed the best HADDOCK score and XL score. (b) Selected model after re-calculation using the correct distance restraints between specific atoms. This model displayed the best combination of HADDOCK score and XL score. (c) Selected model as presented in our protocol, calculated using the erroneously short distance restraints. (d) Crystal structure of the plectin-calmodulin complex: PDB ID 4Q57. (a-d) The calmodulin chain is colored red

Supplementary Figure 3 Inter-protein cross-links mapped onto the predicted best model of the plectin-calmodulin complex derived from re-calculation using the corrected distance restraints between residues for HADDOCK.

(a) Compatible and (b) incompatible cross-links are mapped onto the selected model and are colored green and orange, respectively. (a and b) The calmodulin chain is colored red, the plectin chain blue, calcium is shown as green spheres. E14 of calmodulin and R40 of plectin, the residues involved in formation of a salt bridge, are shown as sticks and are colored green and yellow, respectively

Supplementary Text and Figures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orbán-Németh, Z., Beveridge, R., Hollenstein, D.M. et al. Reply to ‘Defining distance restraints in HADDOCK’. Nat Protoc 13, 1503–1505 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0018-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0018-5

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation