In the case that led the Supreme Court to overturn Roe vs Wade, the State of Mississippi made the strong claim that fetuses can feel pain. We argue that critical biological evidence used to support this claim was misinterpreted and that the State’s argument conflated pain and nociception. Abortion policy has profound moral and ethical consequences and therefore needs to be grounded in the most accurate scientific arguments, as well as a clear understanding of what we mean when we use the term pain.
References
de Waal, F. B. M. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 279–300 (2008).
Davis, K. D. et al. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 13, 624–638 (2017).
Jackson Women’s Health Organization vs Currier. Declaration of Maureen L. Condic, Ph.D., District Court, Sother District of Mississippi. (2018).
Dobbs vs Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Brief of Maureen L. Condic, Ph.D. and the Charlotte Lozier Institute as Amici Curiae supporting petitioners. (2021).
Raja, S. N. et al. Pain 161, 1976–1982 (2020).
International Association for the Study of Pain. Terminology https://www.iasp-pain.org/resources/terminology/ (2011).
Im, S. H. & Galko, M. J. Dev. Dyn. 241, 16–26 (2012).
Silbereis, J. C., Pochareddy, S., Zhu, Y., Li, M. & Sestan, N. Neuron 89, 248–268 (2016).
Derbyshire, S. W. & Bockmann, J. C. J. Med. Ethics 46, 3–6 (2020).
Reardon, S. Nature 518, 474–476 (2015).
Mouraux, A. & Iannetti, G. D. Brain 141, 3290–3307 (2018).
Mouraux, A., Diukova, A., Lee, M. C., Wise, R. G. & Iannetti, G. D. Neuroimage 54, 2237–2249 (2011).
Salomons, T. V., Iannetti, G. D., Liang, M. & Wood, J. N. JAMA Neurol. 73, 755–756 (2016).
Feinstein, J. S. et al. Brain Struct. Funct. 221, 1499–1511 (2016).
Dobbs vs Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Brief of Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, U.S. Association for the Study of Pain and 27 scientific and medical experts as Amici Curiae in support of respondents. (2021).
Lloyd-Thomas, A. R. & Fitzgerald, M. BMJ 313, 797–798 (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Neuroscience thanks Rohini Kuner, Udo Schüklenk and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salomons, T.V., Iannetti, G.D. Fetal pain and its relevance to abortion policy. Nat Neurosci 25, 1396–1398 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01188-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01188-1
- Springer Nature America, Inc.