The splendid computational success of AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold in solving the 60-year-old problem of protein folding raises an obvious question: what new avenues should structural biology explore? We propose a strong pivot toward the goal of reading mechanism and function directly from the amino acid sequence. This ambitious goal will require new data analytical tools and an extensive database of the atomic-level structural trajectories traced out on energy landscapes as proteins perform their function.
References
Jumper, J. et al. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Baek, M. et al. Science 373, 871–876 (2021).
Bernstein, F. C. et al. J. Mol. Biol. 112, 535–542 (1977).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Dashti, A. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17492–17497 (2014).
Hosseinizadeh, A. et al. Nat. Methods 14, 877–881 (2017).
Dashti, A. et al. Nat. Commun. 11, 4734 (2020).
Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Berger, B. & Davis, J. H. Nat. Methods 18, 176–185 (2021).
Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107702 (2021).
Giraldo-Barreto, J. et al. Sci. Rep. 11, 13657 (2021).
Frauenfelder, H., Sligar, S. G. & Wolynes, P. G. Science 254, 1598–1603 (1991).
Ourmazd, A. Nat. Methods 16, 941–944 (2019).
Schwander, P., Fung, R., Phillips, G. N. & Ourmazd, A. New J. Phys. 12, 035007 (2010).
Schwander, P., Fung, R. & Ourmazd, A. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 369, 20130567 (2014).
Nakane, T., Kimanius, D., Lindahl, E. & Scheres, S. H. eLife 7, e36861 (2018).
Giraldo-Barreto, J. Sci. Rep. 11, 13657 (2021).
Hosseinizadeh, A. et al. Nature 599, 697–701 (2021).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge valuable discussions with past and present members of the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee data science group. The development of underlying techniques was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under award DE-SC0002164 (underlying dynamical techniques) and by the US National Science Foundation under awards STC-1231306 (underlying data analytical techniques) and DBI-2029533 (underlying analytical models).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ourmazd, A., Moffat, K. & Lattman, E.E. Structural biology is solved — now what?. Nat Methods 19, 24–26 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01357-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01357-3
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Antimicrobial resistance crisis: could artificial intelligence be the solution?
Military Medical Research (2024)
-
AlphaFold predictions are valuable hypotheses and accelerate but do not replace experimental structure determination
Nature Methods (2024)
-
Structural biology in the age of AI
Nature Methods (2024)
-
Protein structure prediction has reached the single-structure frontier
Nature Methods (2023)
-
Evidence, computation and AI: why evidence is not just in the head
Asian Journal of Philosophy (2023)