Skip to main content
Log in

Response to “The perpetual motion machine of AI-generated data and the distraction of ChatGPT as a ‘scientist’”

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Listgarten, J. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 371–373 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarellos, M. et al. Front. Genet. 13, 1045450 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Global Alliance for Genomics and Health. Science 352, 1278–1280 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gubar, S. A cancer researcher takes cancer personally. The New York Times (15 February 2018).

  5. Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency 77–91 (PMLR, 2018).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Stafford Noble.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noble, W.S. Response to “The perpetual motion machine of AI-generated data and the distraction of ChatGPT as a ‘scientist’”. Nat Biotechnol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02230-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02230-2

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation