Skip to main content
Log in

Patents

Discovering value: women’s participation in university and commercial AI invention

  • Patents
  • Published:

From Nature Biotechnology

View current issue Submit your manuscript

More can be done to diversify the AI innovation ecosystem, especially in the emerging field of biotechnology AI, where women’s participation is associated with substantial value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: The WIR for AI and non-AI patents across all technologies and within biotechnology.
Fig. 2: The WIR and average proportion of women on patenting teams for AI and non-AI patents across all technologies.
Fig. 3: The association between patent value and the proportion of women on patenting teams.

References

  1. Schmidt, E. et al. Final Report: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI, 2021).

  2. Toole, A. A. et al. Inventing AI: Tracing the Diffusion of Artificial Intelligence with US Patents (United States Patent and Trademark Office, 2020).

  3. Bell, A. et al. Q. J. Econ. 134, 647–713 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, L. & Yang, Y. The Commercialization Gap in Pink and Black (Michigan State University, working paper) (2017).

  5. Cook, L. Policies to Broaden Participation in the Innovation Process (Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution (2020).

  6. Exec. Order No. 14801. Fed. Regist. 87, 56849–56860 (2022).

  7. Jumper, J. et al. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thornton, J. M., Laskowski, R. A. & Borkakoti, N. Nat. Med. 27, 1666–1669 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Callaway, E. Nature 604, 234–238 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giczy, A. V., Pairolero, N. A. & Toole, A. A. J. Technol. Transf. 47, 476–505 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmoch, U. Concept of a Technology Classification for Country Comparisons: Final Report to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) (World Intellectual Property Organization, 2008).

  12. Frietsch, R. et al. Res. Policy 38, 590–599 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hunt, J. et al. Res. Policy 42, 831–843 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Toole, A. A. et al. Progress and Potential: A Profile of Women Inventors on U.S. Patents (United State Patent and Trademark Office, 2019).

  15. Sugimoto, C. R., Ni, C., West, J. D. & Larivière, V. PLoS One 10, e0128000 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Corley, E. & Gaughan, M. J. Technol. Transf. 30, 371–381 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giuri, P. et al. J. Technol. Transf. 45, 122–150 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Whittington, K. B. & Smith-Doerr, L. Gend. Soc. 22, 194–218 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding, W. W., Murray, F. & Stuart, T. E. Science 313, 665–667 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perrault, R. et al. The AI Index 2019 Annual Report (AI Index Steering Committee, Human-Centered AI Institute, Stanford University, 2019).

  21. Gaule, P. & Piacentini, M. Res. Policy 47, 805–813 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dennehy, T. C. & Dasgupta, N. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5964–5969 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmadpoor, M. & Jones, B. F. Science 357, 583–587 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B. & Kristinsson, K. Res. Policy 40, 500–509 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoogendoorn, S., Oosterbeek, H. & Van Praag, M. Manage. Sci. 59, 1514–1528 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kogan, L. et al. Q. J. Econ. 132, 665–712 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aneja, A., Reshef, O. & Subramani, G. Try, Try, Try Again? Differential Responses to Rejection and the Gender Innovation Gap (University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, working paper) (2021).

  28. Pairolero, N. et al. Closing the gender gap in patenting: evidence from a randomized control trial at the USPTO. In Proc. 82nd Ann. Meeting of the Acad. Management, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.197 (2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Office of the Chief Economist or the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas A. Pairolero.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1–19, Supplementary Figs. 1–13 and Appendix A

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giczy, A.V., Pairolero, N.A. & Toole, A.A. Discovering value: women’s participation in university and commercial AI invention. Nat Biotechnol 42, 26–29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02075-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02075-1

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation