Eighteen years after its inception, the international Genetically Engineered Machine competition has catalyzed the infusion of synthetic biology with interdisciplinary fundamental and translational research, as well as with inspired young scientists.
References
Haseloff, J. & Ajioka, J. J. R. Soc. Interface. 6, S389–S391 (2009).
Benner, S. A. & Sismour, A. M. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 533 (2005).
Buddingh, B. C. & van Hest, J. C. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 769–777 (2017).
Meng, F. & Ellis, T. Nat. Commun. 11, 5174 (2020).
Vilanova, C. & Porcar, M. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 420–424 (2014).
Balmer, A. S. & Bulpin, K. J. BioSocieties 8, 311–335 (2013).
Stemerding, D. J. Responsible Innov. 2, 140–142 (2015).
Kelwick, R. et al. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 362, fnv129 (2015).
Smolke, C. D. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 1099–1102 (2009).
Goodman, C. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 13 (2008).
Mitchell, R., Dori, Y. J. & Kuldell, N. H. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 20, 156–160 (2011).
Weiyue, J. et al. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 929–931 (2014).
PLOS iGEM 2016 Project. PLOS Collections (8 December 2016); https://collectionsblog.plos.org/welcome-plos-igem-2016-project/
PLOS iGEM 2017 Project. PLOS Collections (2 January 2018); https://collectionsblog.plos.org/welcome-to-the-plos-igem-2017-project/
iGEM Vector: The Unofficial iGEM Proceedings Journal 2020 (MSP Maastricht, 2020);
Beal, J. et al. PLoS ONE 13, e0199432 (2018).
Beal, J. et al. Commun. Biol. 3, 512 (2020).
Beal, J. et al. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 869–871 (2018).
Wright, W. iGEM Biofounders on the rise. iGEM Blog (9 July 2020).
Wright, W., Kuiken, T. & Finan, J. iGEM & the Sustainable Development Goals. iGEM Blog (26 August 2020).
Discovery & Insights Q1 & 2 Report 2020 (iGEM EPIC, 2020).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank G. Uttmark for feedback on the manuscript and the rest of the Academia & Research Committee, along with the After iGEM team and iGEM Foundation, for useful conversations, insights and support that helped in shaping this work and manuscript. A.K.J. is supported by the Clarendon Fund, a SKP scholarship, Exeter College and the Interdisciplinary Bioscience DTP at the University of Oxford (UKRI–BBSRC grant no. BB/M011224/1). R.R.S. acknowledges the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT, grant no. 472427), Cambridge Trust and the EPSRC CDT in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (NanoDTC, grant no. EP/L015978/1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.K.J. and R.R.S. designed this study and its implementation. A.K.J. mined the data supported by A.S. and S.S. A.K.J. and R.R.S. performed data cross-validation aided by A.G., A.M.N. and G.E.K. All authors discussed, analyzed and interpreted the data. R.R.S. prepared the manuscript with help of the other authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
G.E.K. works as an independent consultant for the iGEM Foundation.
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs 1–5 and Supplementary Table 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jainarayanan, A.K., Galanis, A., Sreejith, A. et al. iGEM comes of age: trends in its research output. Nat Biotechnol 39, 1599–1601 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01152-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01152-7
- Springer Nature America, Inc.