Skip to main content
Log in

The case for centralization of care in penile cancer — respecting geographical needs

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Urology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

Centralization of care for penile cancer has been underscored in the 2023 updated EAU–ASCO guidelines. Expertise consolidation enhances patient care, addressing penile cancer complexities from diagnosis to treatment. Centralization initiatives, like the European Reference Networks, and dedicated scientific societies have crucial roles in guiding centralized care pathways to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Brouwer, O. R. et al. European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Guideline on Penile Cancer: 2023 update. Eur. Urol. 83, 548–560 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandini, M. et al. A global approach to improving penile cancer care. Nat. Rev. Urol. 19, 231–239 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hegarty, P. K. & Zafirakis, H. Organ-sparing surgery in penile cancer: a call for centralization of surgery. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 191–192 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Canter, D. J. et al. The International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial (InPACT): rationale and current status. Eur. Urol. Focus 5, 706–709 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Crook, J., Black, P. C., Spiess, P. E. & Pettaway, C. The first International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial (InPACT) opens in Canada! Why additional centers are needed. Can. Urol. Assoc. J. 16, 70–71 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cornes, R. & Earle, W. Current unmet needs in penile cancer: the way forward? Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 38, 151282 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Vries, H. M. et al. Atezolizumab with or without radiotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (the PERICLES study): a phase II trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 4872–4880 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vanthoor, J., Thomas, A., Tsaur, I. & Albersen, M. Making surgery safer by centralization of care: impact of case load in penile cancer. World J. Urol. 38, 1385–1390 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oomen, L. et al. Rare and complex urology: clinical overview of ERN eUROGEN. Eur. Urol. 81, 204–212 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thiagarajan, S. et al. National cancer grid virtual tumor boards of head and neck cancers: an innovative approach to multidisciplinary care. JCO Glob. Oncol. 9, e2200348 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out on behalf of the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors (GSRGT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Basile.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Related links

Global Cancer Observatory: https://gco.iarc.who.int/en

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basile, G., Necchi, A., Prakash, G. et al. The case for centralization of care in penile cancer — respecting geographical needs. Nat Rev Urol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-024-00879-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-024-00879-7

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation